Floret development and survival in wheat plants exposed to contrasting photoperiod and radiation environments during stem elongation
Fernanda G. González A D , Gustavo A. Slafer A B C and Daniel J. Miralles AA Departamento de Producción Vegetal, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Av. San Martín 4453 (C1417DSE), Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
B Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Av. San Martín 4453 (C1417DSE), Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
C Catalonian Institution for Research and Advanced Studies, Department of Crop Production and Forestry, University of Lleida, Centre UdL-IRTA, Av. Rovira Roure 191, 25198 Lleida, Spain.
D Current address: Nidera Semillas S.A, Planta La Ballenera, Ruta 88 Km 41, 7607 CC 9, Miramar, Buenos Aires, Argentina. Corresponding author. Email: fgonzale@agro.uba.ar
Functional Plant Biology 32(3) 189-197 https://doi.org/10.1071/FP04104
Submitted: 17 June 2004 Accepted: 7 January 2005 Published: 5 April 2005
Abstract
Wheat breeding has improved yield potential increasing floret survival through higher dry matter partitioning to the spikes during the stem elongation phase (from terminal spikelet initiation to anthesis). We studied survival of floret primodia in different spikelet positions along the spike in relation to dynamics of spike growth, when dynamics of dry matter partitioning to the spike was altered by photoperiod and shading treatments applied during the stem elongation phase. The cultivar Buck Manantial was exposed to (1) NP+0 un-shaded (natural photoperiod and incoming radiation of the growing season), (2) NP+0 shaded (natural photoperiod but only 33% of the incoming radiation), and (3) NP+6 un-shaded (natural photoperiod extended 6 h and natural incoming radiation). Floret survival increased, depending on spikelet position, 1.1–2.5 fold under un-shaded v. shaded treatments (both under NP+0), and 1.3–1.8 fold under NP+0 v. NP+6 treatments (both un-shaded), without any impact of treatments on the total number of initiated floret primordia. The fate of the floret primordia and its final stage at anthesis were associated with duration of floret development within the stem elongation phase (R2 = 82%, P<0.0001). Florets may be classified into three groups: (i) those that were fertile at anthesis under all treatments (mostly the two florets F1 and F2, proximal to the rachis within the spikelet), (ii) those that reached different stages at anthesis, depending on treatment, and that contributed differentially to the number of fertile florets at anthesis (mostly the florets F3, F4 and F5, positioned in the middle of the spikelet), and (iii) those that did not contribute to the number of fertile florets under any treatment (mostly the florets ≥ F6). Degeneration of florets in group (ii) was associated with spike growth at maximum rate, explaining the strong relationship observed between spike dry weight at anthesis and number of fertile florets. However, degeneration of florets in group (iii) seemed to occur before spike growth at maximum rate. Survival of florets positioned in the middle of the spikelets could be improved by increasing spike growth through manipulation of photoperiod sensitivity during stem elongation.
Keywords: floret development, floret survival, photoperiod, radiation, stem elongation, wheat.
Acknowledgments
This study was partially funded by Fundación Antorchas, FONCyT and UBACyT competitive grants. FGG held a post-graduate scholarship from, while GAS and DJM were members of, CONICET (Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Argentina). GAS was working at the Universidad de Buenos Aires and CONICET during the experimental growing seasons and at ICREA / Universitat de Lleida during final analysis of results and writing of this paper.
Abbate PE,
Andrade FH,
Culot JP, Bindraban PS
(1997) Grain yield in wheat: effects of radiation during spike growth period. Field Crops Research 54, 245–257.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Craufurd PQ, Cartwright PM
(1989) Effect of photoperiod and chlormequat on apical development and growth in a spring wheat (Triticum aestivum) cultivar. Annals of Botany 63, 515–525.
Fischer RA
(1985) Number of kernels in wheat crops and the influence of solar radiation and temperature. The Journal of Agricultural Science 100, 447–461.
Fischer RA, Stockman YM
(1980) Kernel number per spike in wheat: responses to preanthesis shading. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 7, 169–180.
Gardner JS,
Hess WM, Trione EJ
(1985) Development of the young wheat spike: a SEM study of Chinese Spring wheat. American Journal of Botany 72, 548–559.
González FG,
Slafer GA, Miralles DJ
(2003a) Grain and floret number in response to photoperiod during stem elongation in fully and slightly vernalized wheats. Field Crops Research 81, 17–27.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
González FG,
Slafer GA, Miralles DJ
(2003b) Floret development and spike growth as affected by photoperiod during stem elongation in wheat. Field Crops Research 81, 29–38.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
González FG,
Slafer GA, Miralles DJ
(2005) Photoperiod during stem elongation in wheat: is its impact on fertile floret and grain number determination similar to that of radiation? Functional Plant Biology 32, 181–188.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kirby EJM
(1974) Ear development in spring wheat. Journal of Agricultural Science Cambridge 82, 437–447.
Kirby EJM
(1988) Analysis of leaf, stem and ear growth in wheat from terminal spikelet stage to anthesis. Field Crops Research 18, 127–140.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Langer RHM, Hanif M
(1973) A study of floret development in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Annals of Botany 37, 743–751.
Miralles DJ,
Katz SD,
Colloca A, Slafer GA
(1998) Floret development in near isogenic wheat lines differing in plant height. Field Crops Research 59, 21–30.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Miralles DJ,
Richards RA, Slafer GA
(2000) Duration of stem elongation period influences the number of fertile florets in wheat and barley. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 27, 931–940.
Sibony M, Pinthus MJ
(1988) Floret initiation and development in spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Annals of Botany 61, 473–479.
Siddique KHM,
Kirby EJM, Perry MW
(1989) Ear : stem ratio in old and modern wheat varieties, relationship with improvement in number of grains per ear and yield. Field Crops Research 21, 59–78.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Slafer, GA ,
Calderini, DF ,
and
Miralles, DJ (1996). Yield components and compensation in wheat: opportunities for further increasing yield potential. ‘Increasing yield potential in wheat: breaking the barriers’. pp. 101–133. (CIMMYT: Mexico DF)
Slafer GA,
Abeledo LG,
Miralles DJ,
González FG, Whitechurch EM
(2001) Photoperiod sensitivity during stem elongation phase as an avenue to rise potential yield in wheat. Euphytica 119, 191–197.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Stockman YM,
Fischer RA, Brittain EG
(1983) Assimilate supply and floret development within the spike of wheat. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 10, 585–594.
Waddington SR,
Cartwright PM, Wall PC
(1983) A quantitative scale of spike initial and pistil development in barley and wheat. Annals of Botany 51, 119–130.
Youssefian S,
Kirby EJM, Gale MD
(1992) Pleiotropic effects of the GA-insensitive Rht dwarfing genes in wheat. 2. Effects on leaf, stem ear and floret growth. Field Crops Research 28, 191–210.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
