Register      Login
Functional Plant Biology Functional Plant Biology Society
Plant function and evolutionary biology
RESEARCH ARTICLE

EcoMeristem, a model of morphogenesis and competition among sinks in rice. 1. Concept, validation and sensitivity analysis

Delphine Luquet A B , Michael Dingkuhn A , HaeKoo Kim A , Ludovic Tambour A and Anne Clement-Vidal A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A CIRAD, Amis Department, TA40 / 01 Av. Agropolis, 34398 Montpellier Cedex 5, France.

B Corresponding author. Email: delphine.luquet@cirad.fr

Functional Plant Biology 33(4) 309-323 https://doi.org/10.1071/FP05266
Submitted: 31 October 2005  Accepted: 18 January 2006   Published: 3 April 2006

Abstract

Because of rapid advances in functional genomics there is an increasing demand for models simulating complex traits, such as the physiological and environmental controls of plant morphology. This paper describes, validates and explores the behaviour of the structural–functional model EcoMeristem, developed for cereals in the context of the Generation Challenge Program (GCP; CGIAR). EcoMeristem constructs the plant on the basis of an organogenetic body plan, driven by intrinsic (genetic) behavioural norms of meristems. These norms consist of phenological–topological rules for organ initiation and pre-dimensioning (sink creation) and rules enabling feedbacks of the plant’s resource status on the organogenetic processes. Plant resource status is expressed by a state variable called Internal Competition Index (Ic) calculated daily as the ratio of assimilate source (supply) over the sum of active sinks (demand). Ic constitutes an internal signal analogous to sugar signalling. Ic affects potential phytomer size, tiller initiation, leaf senescence, and carbohydrate storage and mobilisation. The model was calibrated and tested on IR64 rice grown in controlled environments, and validated with field observations for the same cultivar (Philippines). Observed distributions and dynamics of soluble sugars and starch in plant organs supported the model concepts of internal competition and the role of reserves as a buffer for Ic fluctuations. Model sensitivity analyses suggested that plant growth and development depend not only on assimilate supply, but also on organogenesis-based demand. If true, this conclusion has important consequences for crop improvement strategies.

Keywords: architecture, complex traits, meristem, modelling, organogenesis, Oryza sativa L., phenotypic plasticity.


Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Global Challenge Program (GCP) ‘Generation’ and Cirad’s ORYZON project for funding this research.


References


Andrade FH, Vega C, Uhart S, Cirilo A, Cantarero M, Valentinuz O (1999) Kernel number determination in maize. Crop Science 39, 453–459. [Verified 19 January 2006]

GCP (2005) Generation challenge programme — cultivating plant diversity for the resource poor. Available at www.generationcp.org [Verified 19 January 2006]

Hammer GL, Kropff MJ, Sinclair TR, Porter JR (2002) Future contributions of crop modelling — from heuristics and supporting decision making to understanding genetic regulation and aiding crop improvement. European Journal of Agronomy 18, 15–31.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | [Verified 19 January 2006]

Reynolds MP, Pellegrineschi A, Skovmand B (2005) Sink-limitation to yield and biomass: a summary of some investigations in spring wheat. Annals of Applied Biology 146, 39–49. open url image1

Samonte SOPB, Wilson LT, McClung AM, Tarpley L (2001) Seasonal dynamics of nonstructural carbohydrate partitioning in 15 diverse rice genotypes. Crop Science 41, 902–909. open url image1

Schnier HF, Dingkuhn M, De Datta SK, Mengel K, Faronilo JE (1990) Response of direct seeded and transplanted flooded rice to nitrogen fertilization: I. Plant nitrogen uptake, canopy photosynthesis, growth and yield. Crop Science 30, 1276–1284. open url image1

Sherson SM, Alford HL, Forbes SM, Wallace G, Smith SM (2003) Roles of cell-wall invertases and monosaccharide transporters in the growth and development of Arabidopsis. Journal of Experimental Botany 54, 525–531.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Skinner RH, Nelson CJ (1995) Elongation of the grass leaf and its relationship to the phyllochron. Crop Science 35, 4–10. open url image1

Sultan B, Baron C, Dingkuhn M, Sarr B, Janicot S (2005) Agricultural impacts of large-scale variability of the West African monsoon. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 128, 93–110.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Sylvester AW, Parker-Clark V, Murray GA (2001) Leaf shape and anatomy as indicators of phase change in the grasses: comparison of maize, rice, and bluegrass. American Journal of Botany 88, 2157–2167. open url image1

Tardieu F, Reymond M, Hamard P, Granier C, Muller B (2000) Spatial distributions of expansion rate, cell division rate and cell size in maize leaves: a synthesis of the effects of soil water status, evaporative demand and temperature. Journal of Experimental Botany 51, 1505–1514.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Tivet F, da Silveira Pinheiro B, de Raïssac M, Dingkuhn M (2001) Leaf blade dimensions of rice (Oryza sativa L. and Oryza glaberrima Steud.). Relationships between tillers and main stem. Annals of Botany 88, 507–511.
Crossref |
open url image1

Verhoerf W (1985) Light scattering by leaf layers with application to canopy reflectance modelling: the SAIL model. Remote Sensing of Environment 17, 1666–1678. open url image1

Verma AK, Pandey N, Tripathi RS (2004) Leaf growth, chlorophyll, nitrogen content and grain yield of hybrid rice as influenced by planting times and N levels. Annals of Agricultural Research 25, 456–458. open url image1

Walter A, Schurr U (2005) Dynamics of leaf and root growth: endogenous control versus environmental impact. Annals of Botany 95, 891–900.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Wang E, Robertson MJ, Hammer GL, Carberry PS, Holzworth D, Meinke H, Chapman SC, Hargreaves JNG, Huth NI, McLean G (2002) Development of a generic crop model template in the cropping system model APSIM. European Journal of Agronomy 18, 121–140.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Williams, RF (1975). ‘The shoot apex and leaf growth. A study in quantitative biology.’ (Cambridge University Press: London)

Wright SD, McConnaughay KDM (2002) Interpreting phenotypic plasticity: the importance of ontogeny. Plant Species Biology 17, 119–131.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Yan HP, Kang MZ, Reffye PD, Dingkuhn M (2004) A dynamic, architectural plant model simulating resource-dependent growth. Annals of Botany 93, 591–602.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Yoshida H, Horie T, Shiraiwa T (2006) A model explaining genotypic and environmental variation of spikelet number per unit area measured by cross-locational experiments in Asia. Field Crops Research In press , open url image1