Register      Login
Journal of Primary Health Care Journal of Primary Health Care Society
Journal of The Royal New Zealand College of General Practitioners
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Cardiovascular risk assessment: Audit findings from a nurse clinic – a quality improvement initiative

Sarah Waldron and Margaret Horsburgh

Journal of Primary Health Care 1(3) 226 - 231
Published: 2009

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT: Evidence has shown the effectiveness of risk factor management in reducing mortality and morbidity from cardiovascular disease (CVD). An audit of a nurse CVD risk assessment programme undertaken between November 2005 and December 2008 in a Northland general practice. METHOD : A retrospective audit of CVD risk assessment with data for the first entry of 621 patients collected exclusively from PREDICT-CVDTM, along with subsequent data collected from 320 of these patients who had a subsequent assessment recorded at an interval ranging from six months to three years (18 month average). RESULTS: Of the eligible population (71%) with an initial CVD risk assessment, 430 (69.2%) had a five year absolute risk less than 15%, with 84 (13.5%) having a risk greater than 15% and having not had a cardiovascular event. Of the patients with a follow-up CVD risk assessment, 34 showed improvement. Medication prescribing for patients with absolute CVD risk greater than 15% increased from 71% to 86% for anti-platelet medication and for lipid lowering medication from 65% to 72% in the audit period. STRATEGIES FOR IMPROVEMENT: The recently available ‘heart health’ trajectory tool will help patients become more aware of risks that are modifiable, together with community support to engage more patients in the nurse CVD prevention programme. Further medication audits to monitor prescribing trends. LESSONS: Patients who showed an improvement in CVD risk had an improvement in one or more modifiable risk factors and became actively involved in making changes to their health. KEYWORDS: Cardiovascular disease risk assessment; nurse clinics; audit

https://doi.org/10.1071/HC09226

© CSIRO 2009

Committee on Publication Ethics

PDF (172 KB) Export Citation Cited By (1)

Share

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn Share via Email

View Dimensions