Register      Login
Marine and Freshwater Research Marine and Freshwater Research Society
Advances in the aquatic sciences
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Feeding dynamics, consumption rates and daily ration of longtail tuna (Thunnus tonggol) in Australian waters, with emphasis on the consumption of commercially important prawns

Shane P. Griffiths A B , Gary C. Fry A , Fiona J. Manson A and Richard D. Pillans A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A CSIRO Division of Marine and Atmospheric Research, PO Box 120, Cleveland, Qld 4163, Australia.

B Corresponding author. Email: shane.griffiths@csiro.au

Marine and Freshwater Research 58(4) 376-397 https://doi.org/10.1071/MF06197
Submitted: 20 October 2006  Accepted: 11 January 2007   Published: 13 April 2007

Abstract

The feeding ecology of longtail tuna was studied in northern and eastern Australia. Diet biomass data were used to estimate daily ration and consumption of individual prey taxa, particularly penaeids targeted by Australia’s valuable Northern Prawn Fishery (NPF). Overall, the 497 stomachs contained 101 prey taxa. In both regions, small pelagic and demersal fishes comprised the majority of the diet biomass. Fish in both regions showed a marked increase in prey diversity, variation in prey composition and stomach fullness index in autumn and winter (March–August). This increase in apparently opportunistic feeding behaviour and feeding intensity showed an inverse relationship with reproductive activity, indicating a possible energy investment for gonad development. Daily ration decreased with increasing fish size, while annual consumption by fish increased with size. Total prey consumption in the Gulf of Carpentaria was estimated at 148 178 t year–1. This includes 599 t year-1 of penaeids, equivalent to 11% of the annual NPF catch. This study demonstrated that longtail tuna play an important ecological role in neritic ecosystems. Their interaction with commercial fisheries highlights the need for targeted dietary studies of high order predators to better understand trophic pathways to facilitate ecosystem-based fisheries management.

Additional keywords: diet, ecosystem, fisheries management, pelagic, Penaeus, predation, trophodynamics.


Acknowledgements

We thank A. Vickers and crew from the FV ‘Kundu’, who provided samples from the Gulf of Carpentaria, and the numerous sport fishers who helped collect specimens. K. Davidson and Q. Dell are acknowledged for assistance with processing stomach samples. We are especially appreciative of constructive comments made on drafts of this manuscript by R. J. Olson (IATTC), S. J. M. Blaber and M. D. E. Haywood (CSIRO). This study was funded by CSIRO Division of Marine and Atmospheric Research.


References

Aguado-Gimenez, F. , and Garcia-Garcia, B. (2005). Growth, food intake and feed conversion rates in captive Atlantic bluefin tuna (Thunnus thynnus Linnaeus, 1758) under fattening conditions. Aquaculture Research 36, 610–614.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Barry M. (1978). ‘Behavioral Response of Yellowfin Tuna, Thunnus albacares, and Kawakawa, Euthynnus affinis, to Turbidity.’ (NOAA/ERL/PMEL: Seattle, WA.)

Begg, G. A. , and Hopper, G. A. (1997). Feeding patterns of school mackerel (Scomberomorus queenslandicus) and spotted mackerel (S. munroi) Queensland east-coast waters. Marine and Freshwater Research 48, 565–571.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Bienke B.C. (2004). NPF late start a disaster. Professional Fisherman August, 6.

Blaber, S. J. M. (2002). Fish in hot water: the challenges facing fish and fisheries research in tropical estuaries. Journal of Fish Biology 61, 1–20.
Chipps S. R., and Garvey J. E. (2007). Quantitative assessment of food habits and feeding patterns. In ‘Analysis and Interpretation of Freshwater Fisheries Data’. (Eds C. Guy and M. Brown.) Chapter 11. (American Fisheries Society: Bethesda, MD.)

Clarke, K. R. (1993). Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Australian Journal of Ecology 18, 117–143.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Korsmeyer K. E., and Dewar H. (2001). Tuna metabolism and energetics. In ‘Tuna Physiology, Ecology and Evolution’. (Eds B. A. Block and E. D. Stevens.) pp. 35–78. (Academic Press: San Diego, CA.)

Lemos, R. T. , and Gomes, J. F. (2004). Do local environmental factors induce daily and yearly variability in bluefin tuna (Thunnus thynnus) trap catches? Ecological Modelling 177, 143–156.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Okey T. A. (2006). ‘An Ecopath Model of Albatross Bay, Gulf of Carpentaria, Australia, for the Period 1986–1992: a Contribution to the FRDC 2004/024 Project Variation in Banana Prawn Catches at Weipa: a Comprehensive Regional Study.’ (CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research: Cleveland, QLD.)

Olson, R. J. , and Boggs, C. H. (1986). Apex predation by yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares): Independent estimates from gastric evacuation and stomach contents, bioenergetics, and cesium concentrations. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 43, 1760–1775.
Silas E. G. (1967). Tuna fishery of the Tinnevelly coast, Gulf of Mannar. Symposium Series of the Marine Biological Association of India 1, 1083–118.

Sturm, M.G. de L. (1978). Aspects of the biology of Scomberomorus maculatus (Mitchill) in Trinidad. Journal of Fish Biology 13, 155–172.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Wilson M. A. (1981). The biology, ecology and exploitation of longtail tuna, Thunnus tonggol (Bleeker) in Oceania. MSc Thesis, Macquarie University, Sydney.

Yesaki M. (1993). ‘A Review of the Biology and Fisheries for Longtail Tuna (Thunnus tonggol) in the Indo-Pacific Region.’ FAO Fisheries Technical Paper No. 336, Vol. 2. (FAO: Rome.)

Young, J. W. , Lamb, T. D. , Le, D. , Bradford, R. , and Whitelaw, A. W. (1997). Feeding ecology and interannual variations in diet of southern bluefin tuna, Thunnus maccoyii, in relation to coastal and oceanic waters off eastern Tasmania, Australia. Environmental Biology of Fishes 50, 275–291.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Zhou S., and Griffiths S. P. (2006). Sustainability Assessment for Fishing Effects (SAFE): an application to diverse elasmobranch bycatch in a tropical Australian prawn trawl fishery. In'Design, Trial and Implementation of an Integrated, Long-term Bycatch Monitoring Program, Road Tested in the NPF. Final Report on FRDC Project 2004/024'. (Eds D. Brewer, S. Griffiths, D. Heales, S. Zhou, M. Tonks, Q. Dell, P. Kuhnert, S. Keys, W. Whitelaw, A. Burke, E. Raudzens.) pp. 179–207. (CSIRO: Cleveland, Qld.)