Register      Login
Emu Emu Society
Journal of BirdLife Australia
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Foraging behaviour of birds in an arid sand-dune scrubland in Argentina

Pedro G. Blendinger
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

CONICET – Unidad Zoología y Ecología Animal, IADIZA, CC 507, 5500 Mendoza, Argentina. Present address: CONICET – Laboratorio de Investigaciones Ecológicas de las Yungas, Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. CC 34, 4107 Yerba Buena, Tucumán, Argentina. Email: blendinger@birdecology.com.ar

Emu 105(1) 67-79 https://doi.org/10.1071/MU03050
Submitted: 13 October 2003  Accepted: 4 October 2004   Published: 31 March 2005

Abstract

Studies of the foraging behaviour of birds allow exploration of the mechanisms that structure species assemblages. The major objective of this study was to describe relationships among various components of foraging behaviour and whether changes in those relationships reflected seasonal changes in assemblage structure of birds from an arid scrubland of the Monte Desert, Argentina. Foraging behaviour was described in terms of attack manoeuvres, food substrate (i.e. substrate from which food was taken), foraging site (i.e. the substrate and height from where birds launched the attack), and plant species used. Between-species differences in attack manoeuvres, food substrate and foraging site were interrelated, the association being strongest between foraging sites and food substrates. During the non-breeding season, foraging sites and food substrates differentiated species. The most important changes between seasons were related to the arrival in summer of aerial-foraging tyrant flycatchers, a functional group absent during the non-breeding season. Foraging sites explained most of the differences among species groups, suggesting that habitat heterogeneity and structural complexity of vegetation are important environmental variables that determine the avian assemblage structure. Moreover, temporal changes in food availability, mediated by strong seasonality in climate, were important factors that were correlated with compositional and structural variability in functional groups of birds (i.e. granivores-insectivores, surface insectivores and aerial insectivores).


Acknowledgments

This study was supported by a doctoral grant of the National Council for Science and Technology (CONICET) of Argentina, and was partially supported by a CONICET grant (PIP No. 4684). Harry Recher and Van Remsen provided helpful advice on the manuscript. Thanks to Ricardo Ojeda, Manuel Nores, Jorge Gonnet, Stella Giannoni and John Blake for comments on a first draft; to Adriana Rubinstein, Susana Peluc and Dolores Juri for their assistance in the field; and to the Department of Natural Resources of Mendoza for logistical support at Telteca.


References

Blendinger, P. G. (1999). Facilitation of sap-feeding birds by the White-fronted Woodpecker in the Monte Desert, Argentina. Condor 101, 402–407.
Blendinger P. G. (2000). Ecología trófica de aves de zonas áridas del Monte. Tesis Doctoral, Universidad Nacional de Tucumán, Tucumán, Argentina.

Blendinger, P. G. (in press). Abundance and diversity of small-bird assemblages in the Monte desert, Argentina. Journal of Arid Environments ,in press
Debandi G. (1999). Dinámica Comunitaria de los Artrópodos Asociados a Larrea (Zygophyllaceae). Tesis Doctoral, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, La Plata, Argentina.

Fitzpatrick, J. W. (1985). Form, foraging behavior, and adaptive radiation in the Tyrannidae. Ornithological Monographs 36, 447–470.
Jongman R. H. G., ter Braak C. J. F., and van Tongeren O. F. R. (1995). ‘Data Analysis in Community and Landscape Ecology.’ (Cambridge University Press: New York.)

Keast, A. , and Recher, H. F. (1997). The adaptive zone of the genus Gerygone (Acanthizidae) as shown by morphology and feeding habits. Emu 97, 1–17.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | McCune B., and Grace J. B. (2002). ‘Analysis of Ecological Communities.’ (MjM Software Design: Gleneden Beach, OR, USA.)

Miles, D. B. (1990a). The importance and consequences of temporal variation in avian foraging behavior. Studies in Avian Biology 13, 210–217.
Morello J. (1984). ‘Perfil ecológico de Sudamérica. Vol. 1.’ (Ediciones Cultura Hispánica, Instituto de Cooperación Iberoamericana: Barcelona.)

Morrison, M. L. (1984). Influence of sample size and sampling design on analysis of avian foraging behavior. Condor 86, 146–150.
Remsen J. V.Jr, Jaramillo A., Nores M. A., Robbins M. B., Schulenberg T. S., Stiles F. G., da Silva J. M. C., Stotz D. F., and Zimmer K. J. (2004). ‘A Classification of the Bird Species of South America.’ (American Ornithologists' Union: Louisiana.) Online at http://www.museum.lsu.edu/~Remsen/SACCBaseline.html [Accessed May 2004].

Rossi, B. E. , and Villagra, P. E. (2003). Prosopis flexuosa effects on the spatial pattern of understorey species in arid Argentina. Journal of Vegetation Science 14, 543–550.
ter Braak K. J. F. (1991). ‘CANOCO Version 3.12.’ (Agricultural Mathematics Group: Wageningen, The Netherlands.)

Tomoff, C. S. (1974). Avian species diversity in desert scrub. Ecology 55, 396–403.


Wilson, K. , and Recher, H. F. (2001). Foraging ecology and habitat selection of the Yellow-plumed Honeyeater, Lichenostomus ornatus, in a Western Australian woodland: implications for conservation. Emu 101, 89–94.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |