Register      Login
Emu Emu Society
Journal of BirdLife Australia
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Differences in rates of nest-visitation and removal of faecal sacs by male and female White-rumped Swallows

Florencia Bulit A , Andrés G. Palmerio A and Viviana Massoni A B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Departamento de Ecología, Genética y Evolución, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Intendente Güiraldes 2160, C1428EGA, Capital Federal, Argentina.

B Corresponding author. Email: massoni@ege.fcen.uba.ar

Emu 108(2) 181-185 https://doi.org/10.1071/MU07068
Submitted: 8 November 2007  Accepted: 13 May 2008   Published: 20 June 2008

Abstract

Despite being a common and widespread species, the White-rumped Swallow (Tachycineta leucorrhoa) is one of the least-studied members of its genus. We examined the rates of nest-visitation and nest-sanitation of male and female White-rumped Swallows during the nestling period, in 23 nests, and compared them with those of the extensively studied Tree Swallow (Tachycineta bicolor). White-rumped Swallow pairs increased the rate of nest-visitation as nestlings grew older, as was found in Tree Swallows. Females made significantly more visits to the nest than males, and the asymmetry was maintained irrespectively of the age of nestlings. These results are similar to those reported from Tree Swallows in the eastern United States, but differ from the equality of roles found in Ontario, Canada. Female and male White-rumped Swallows removed faecal sacs at the same rate when nestlings were young (Day 4) but by Day 12 females had quadrupled their effort whereas the rate of sanitation by males remained constant. Overall, female White-rumped Swallows made a significantly larger parental investment than males (as measured by number of visits to nests and, thus, presumably rates of feeding, and in contribution to nest-sanitation) and, in this respect, the asymmetry in parental investment is greater than that reported for Tree Swallows.

Additional keywords: feeding rate, nest-sanitation rate, parental care, parental investment, Tachycineta leucorrhoa


Acknowledgements

We thank J. C. Reboreda for providing video cameras to conduct this study and to G. Somoza and L. Miranda for logistical support at the InTeCh-CONICET. We are grateful for the suggestions made by two anonymous referees and the Managing Editor to previous versions of this manuscript. This study was supported by an Ubacyt grant X-158 to Juan Carlos Reboreda and an Ubacyt X-140 grant to V. Massoni. F. Bulit and A. G. Palmerio are doctoral candidates at CONICET, Argentina, and V. Massoni is a Research Fellow at the same institution.


References

Ardia, D. R. (2007). Site- and sex-level differences in adult feeding behaviour and its consequences to offspring quality in tree swallows (Tachycineta bicolor) following brood-size manipulation. Canadian Journal of Zoology 85, 847–854.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | NRCC (2004). ‘The Ithaca Climate Page.’ (Northeast Regional Climate Center: Ithaca, NY.) Available at http://www.nrcc.cornell.edu/climate/ithaca/index.html [Verified 10 April 2008]

Peer, K. , Robertson, R. J. , and Kempenaers, B. (2000). Reproductive anatomy and indices of quality in male Tree Swallows: the potential reproductive role of floaters. Auk 117, 74–81.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Quinn G. P., and Keough M. J. (2002). ‘Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologists.’ (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.)

Quinney, T. E. (1986). Male and female parental care in Tree Swallows. Wilson Bulletin 98, 147–150.
Ridgely R. S., and Tudor G. ((1989). ). ‘The Birds of South America. Vol. 1: The Oscine Passerines.’ (Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.)

Skutch, A. F. (1949). Do tropical birds rear as many young as they can nourish? Ibis 91, 430–455.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | SMN (2004). ‘Sitio Web del Servicio Meterológico Nacional.’ (Servicio Meteorológico Nacional, Fuerza Aérea Argentina: Buenos Aires.) Available at http://www.meteofa.mil.ar [Verified 10 April 2008]

Soriano O. (1991). Rio de la Plata Grasslands. In ‘Natural Grassland. Introduction and Western Hemisphere’. (Ed. R. T. Coupland.) pp. 367–407. (Elsevier: Amsterdam.)

Statsoft (1995). ‘STATISTICA for Windows, Version 5.0.’ (Statsoft Inc.: Tulsa, OK.)

Walsberg G. E. (1983). Avian ecological energetics. In ‘Avian Biology’. (Eds D. S. Farner and J. S. King.) pp. 161-220. (Academic Press: New York.)

Weatherhead, P. J. (1984). Fecal sac removal by Tree Swallows: the cost of cleanliness. Condor 86, 187–191.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Whittingham, L. A. , Dunn, P. O. , and Robertson, R. J. (1993). Confidence of paternity and male parental care: an experimental study in Tree Swallows. Animal Behaviour 46, 139–147.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Whittingham, L. A. , Dunn, P. O. , and Clotfelter, E. D. (2003). Parental allocation of food to nestling Tree Swallows: the influence of nestling behaviour, sex and paternity. Animal Behaviour 65, 1203–1210.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Williams, J. B. (1988). Field metabolism of Tree Swallows during the breeding season. Auk 105, 706–714.


Winkler, D. W. (1991). Parental investment decision rules in Tree Swallows: parental defence, abandonment and the so-called Concorde Fallacy. Behavioral Ecology 2, 133–142.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Winkler, D. W. (1992). Causes and consequences of variation in parental defense behaviour by Tree Swallows. Condor 94, 502–520.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |