Register      Login
Reproduction, Fertility and Development Reproduction, Fertility and Development Society
Vertebrate reproductive science and technology
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Comparison of the effects of in vitro and in situ storage on the viability of mouse ovarian tissue collected after death

M. Snow, M. Cleary, S-L. Cox, J. Shaw, M. Paris and G. Jenkin

Reproduction, Fertility and Development 13(6) 389 - 394
Published: 03 December 2001

Abstract

Ovarian tissues, collected or salvaged from endangered species at the time of gonadectomy or following their death, are being transported to genebanks for storage with the assumption that they will (subsequently) yield sufficient numbers of germ cells to help preserve the species. The present study aimed to quantify the impact of delays in collecting and/or processing ovarian tissue on the number of follicles in this tissue that remained normal after grafting. The study compared the viability of ovarian tissue stored in vitro (in phosphate-buffered saline) versus in situ (in the body) either on ice or at room temperature for 0 (non-stored fresh grafts), 3, 6, 12, 24 or 48 h. The conditions of storage had significant effects on the total number of morphologically normal follicles, with significantly more follicles in grafts developing from in vitro-stored tissue than in situ-stored tissue. Storage temperature and duration of storage, but not the storage temperature alone, influenced follicle survival. Tissue that was grafted immediately after collection (0 h) was best, but normal follicles were recovered in grafts stored in vitro (on ice or at room temperature) or in situ (on ice only) for up to 48 h before grafting. The rate of follicle loss over time was very rapid, with approximately 50% fewer follicles in grafts derived from tissue stored for only 3 h compared with non-stored fresh grafts (0 h). The results show that viable ovarian tissue can be salvaged from animals up to 48 h after death; however, in order to best protect the follicle population, the ovaries should be removed from the animal’s body as soon as possible.

https://doi.org/10.1071/RD00130

© CSIRO 2001

Committee on Publication Ethics


Rent Article (via Deepdyve) Export Citation Cited By (18) Get Permission

View Dimensions