Register      Login
Reproduction, Fertility and Development Reproduction, Fertility and Development Society
Vertebrate reproductive science and technology
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Biosecurity strategies for conserving valuable livestock genetic resources

Anthony E. Wrathall A C , Hugh A. Simmons A , Dianna J. Bowles B and Sam Jones B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Veterinary Laboratories Agency-Weybridge, Addlestone, Surrey KT15 3NB, UK.

B The Sheep Trust, Biology-Area 8, University of York, PO Box 373, York, YO10 5YW, UK.

C To whom correspondence should be addressed. email: awrathall.vla@gtnet.gov.uk

Reproduction, Fertility and Development 16(2) 103-112 https://doi.org/10.1071/RD03083
Submitted: 1 August 2003  Accepted: 1 October 2003   Published: 2 January 2004

Abstract

The foot and mouth disease (FMD) epidemic in the UK in 2001 highlighted the threat of infectious diseases to rare and valuable livestock and stimulated a renewed interest in biosecurity and conservation. However, not all diseases resemble FMD: their transmission routes and pathological effects vary greatly, so biosecurity strategies must take this into account. Realism is also needed as to which diseases to exclude and which will have to be tolerated. The aim should be to minimise disease generally and to exclude those diseases that threaten the existence of livestock or preclude their national or international movement. Achieving this requires a team effort, bearing in mind the livestock species involved, the farming system (‘open’ or ‘closed’) and the premises. Effective biosecurity demands that practically every aspect of farm life is controlled, including movements of people, vehicles, equipment, food, manure, animal carcasses and wildlife. Above all, biosecurity strategies must cover the disease risks associated with moving the livestock themselves and this will require quarantine if adult or juvenile animals are imported into the herd or flock. The present paper emphasises the important role that reproductive technologies, such as artificial insemination and embryo transfer, can have in biosecurity strategies because they offer much safer ways for getting new genetic materials into herds/flocks than bringing in live animals. Embryo transfer is especially safe when the sanitary protocols promoted by the International Embryo Transfer Society and advocated by the Office International des Epizooties (the ‘World Organisation for Animal Health’) are used. Embryo transfer can also allow the full genetic complement to be salvaged from infected animals. Cryobanking of genetic materials, especially embryos, is another valuable biosecurity strategy because it enables their storage for conservation in the face of contingencies, such as epidemic disease and other catastrophes.


Acknowledgements

We are grateful to colleagues in the IETS Health and Safety Advisory Committee and at Veterinary Laboratories Agency-Weybridge, ADAS Arthur Rickwood, The Sheep Trust and Britbreed Ltd for their helpful discussions on a variety of aspects of biosecurity and reproductive technologies.


References

Anonymous, (2001). Editorial. Nat. Immunol. 2, 565.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Canon, R. M., and  Roe, R. T. (1982). Livestock Disease Surveys: A Field Manual for Veterinarians. (Australian Government Publishing Service: Canberra)

Dawson, M. (2003). The National Scrapie Plan: progress to date and future developments. State Vet. J. 13, 40–46.


Donaldson, A. I. , Alexandersen, S. , Sorensen, J. H. , and Mikkelsen, T. (2001). Relative risks of the uncontrollable (airborne) spread of foot and mouth disease by different species. Vet. Rec. 148, 602–604.


Gillespie, R. R. , Hill, M. A. , and Kanitz, C. L. (1996). Infection of pigs by aerosols of Aujeszky’s disease virus and their shedding of the virus. Res. Vet. Sci. 60, 228–233.


Hennecken, M. , Stegeman, J. A. , Elbers, A. R. W. , van Nes, A. , Smak, J. A. , and Verheijden, J. H. M. (2000). Transmission of classical swine fever virus by artificial insemination during the 1997–1998 epidemic in the Netherlands: a descriptive epidemiological study. Vet. Q. 22, 228–233.


International Embryo Transfer Society (1998). ‘Manual of the International Embryo Transfer Society: A Procedural Guide and General Information for the Use of Embryo Transfer Technology, Emphasising Sanitary Procedures’, 3rd edn. (IETS: Savoy, IL.)

Mackay, D. (2002). Differentiation of infection from vaccination in foot and mouth disease. State Vet. J. 12, 22–26.


Mellor, P. S. (1994).  Bluetongue. State Vet. J. 4, 7–10.


Mawhinney, I. (2002). Markers for the future of IBR control in the UK. Cattle Practice 10, 213–217.


OIE (2000). ‘Manual of Standards for Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines’, 4th edn. (Office International des Epizooties: Paris.)

OIE (2002). ‘International Animal Health Code (Mammals, Birds and Bees)’, 1st edn. (Office International des Epizooties: Paris.)

Otake, S. , Dee, S. A. , Rossow, K. D. , Moon, R. D. , and Pijoan, C. (2002). Mechanical transmission of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus by mosquitoes, Aedes vexans (Meigen). Can. J. Vet. Res. 66, 191–195.


Parker, B. N. J. , Wrathall, A. E. , and Cartwright, S. F. (1981). Accidental introduction of porcine parvovirus and Talfan virus into a group of minimal disease gilts and their effects on reproduction. Br. Vet. J. 137, 262–267.


Parker, B. N. J. , Wrathall, A. E. , Saunders, R. W. , Dawson, M. , Done, S. H. , Francis, P. G. , Dexter, I. , and Bradley, R. (1998). Prevention of transmission of sheep pulmonary adenomatosis by embryo transfer. Vet. Rec. 142, 687–689.


Pearsall, W. H., and  Pennington, W. (1973). ‘The Lake District, New Naturalist Series No. 53.’ (W. M. Collins and Sons: London.)

Philpott, M. (1993). The dangers of disease transmission by artificial insemination and embryo transfer. Br. Vet. J. 149, 339–369.


Pointon, A. M., Morrison, R. B., Hill, G., Dargatz, D., and  Dial, G. (1990). ‘Monitoring Pathology in Slaughtered Stock: Guidelines for Selecting Sample Size and Interpreting Results.’ (National Animal Health Monitoring System, United States Department of Agriculture: Washington DC.)

Stringfellow, D. A. , Givens, M. D. , and Waldrop, J. G. (2004). Biosecurity issues associated with current and emerging reproductive technologies. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 16, 93–102.


Sutmoller, P. , and Wrathall, A. E. (1997). A quantitative assessment of the risk of transmission of foot-and-mouth disease, bluetongue and vesicular stomatitis by embryo transfer in cattle. Prev. Vet. Med. 32, 111–132.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Thibier, M. , and Stringfellow, D. A. (2003). Health and Safety Advisory Committee (HASAC) of the International Embryo Transfer Society (IETS) has managed critical challenges for two decades. Theriogenology 59, 1067–1078.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wrathall, A. E. (1997). Risks of transmitting scrapie and bovine spongiform encephalopathy by semen and embryos. Rev. Sci. Tech. 16, 240–264.


Wrathall, A. E. (2000). Risks of transmission of spongiform encephalopathies by reproductive technologies in domesticated ruminants. Livest. Prod. Sci. 62, 287–316.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wrathall, A. E. , Brown, K. F. D. , Sayers, A. R. , Wells, G. A. H. , and Simmons, M. M. , et al. (2002). Studies on embryo transfer from cattle clinically affected with bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE). Vet. Rec. 150, 365–378.