Reproduction, Fertility and Development Reproduction, Fertility and Development Society
Vertebrate reproductive science and technology
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Paternal care in the mound-building mouse reduces inter-litter intervals

Christophe Féron A B and Patrick Gouat A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A LEEC CNRS UMR 7153, Université Paris 13, F-93430 Villetaneuse, France.

B Corresponding author. Email: christophe.feron@leec.univ-paris13.fr

Reproduction, Fertility and Development 19(3) 425-429 https://doi.org/10.1071/RD06150
Submitted: 31 October 2006  Accepted: 15 December 2006   Published: 14 March 2007

Abstract

In many rodent species males display paternal behaviour. The primary reported effect of this paternal care is to increase pup survival. In mammal females, pregnancy and lactation are energetically demanding, especially when they are concurrent in post-partum reproduction. To face this energy requirement, females generally lengthen the duration of their post-partum pregnancy. In the present study we tested whether paternal care could affect this duration in the monogamous mound building mouse Mus spicilegus. In this species, females have a short reproductive life that does not exceed 4 months. Reduction of inter-delivery latencies would then be an efficient way to increase reproductive success. In a male removal experiment, we showed that inter-delivery latency was shortened by male presence. Moreover, behavioural estimations of paternal involvement were correlated with inter-delivery latency. The longer the male spent inside the nest the shorter the inter-delivery latency. In the mound-building mouse, the female might be able to monopolise the parental care of a single male, which could be important for the evolution of monogamy. The characteristics of first reproduction as compared to post-partum reproduction suggest that it may contribute to the formation of a strong and exclusive social bond between the reproductive partners.

Additional keywords: frequency of reproduction, monogamy, Mus spicilegus.


References

Asdell S. (1964). ‘Patterns of Mammalian Reproduction.’ (Cornell University Press: New York.)

Bateman, N. (1957). Some physiological aspects of lactation in mice. J. Agric. Sci. 49, 60–77.


Baudoin, C. , Busquet, N. , Dobson, F. S. , Gheusi, G. , Féron, C. , Durand, J. L. , Heth, G. , Patris, B. , and Todrank, J. (2005). Male–female associations and female olfactory neurogenesis with pair bonding in Mus spicilegus. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 84, 323–334.
CrossRef |

Bindon, B. M. (1969). Mechanism of the inhibition of implantation in suckling mice. J. Endocrinol. 44, 357–362.
PubMed |

Brown R. E. (1985). The rodent I: effects of odours on reproductive physiology (primer effects). In ‘Social Odours in Mammals. Vol. 1’. (Eds R. E. Brown and D. W. MacDonald.) pp. 245–344. (Oxford University Press: New York.)

Carter, C. S. , DeVries, A. C. , and Getz, L. L. (1995). Physiological substrates of mammalian monogamy: the prairie vole model. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 19, 303–314.
CrossRef | PubMed |

Clutton-Brock, T. H. (1989). Mammalian mating systems. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 236, 339–372.
PubMed |

Dewsbury, D. A. (1985). Paternal behavior in rodents. Am. Zool. 25, 841–852.


Eisenberg J. F. (1981). ‘The Mammalian Radiation. An Analysis of Trends in Evolution, Adaptation, and Behaviour.’ (University of Chicago Press: Chicago.)

Elwood R. W. (1983). Paternal care in rodents. In ‘Parental Behaviour in Rodents’. (Ed. R. W. Elwood.) pp. 235–257. (John Wiley and Sons: New York.)

Féron, C. , and Gheusi, G. (2003). Social regulation of reproduction in the female mound-builder mouse (Mus spicilegus). Physiol. Behav. 78, 717–722.
CrossRef | PubMed |

Garza, J. C. , Dallas, J. , Duryadi, D. , Gerasimov, S. , Croset, H. , and Boursot, P. (1997). Social structure of the mound-building mouse Mus spicilegus revealed by genetic analysis with microsatellites. Mol. Ecol. 6, 1009–1017.
CrossRef | PubMed |

Gouat, P. , and Féron, C. (2005). Deficit in reproduction in polygynously mated females of the monogamous mound-building mouse Mus spicilegus. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 17, 617–623.
CrossRef | PubMed |

Gouat, P. , Féron, C. , and Demouron, S. (2003a). Seasonal reproduction and delayed sexual maturity in mound-building mice Mus spicilegus. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 15, 187–195.
CrossRef | PubMed |

Gouat, P. , Katona, K. , and Poteaux, C. (2003b). Is the socio-spatial distribution of mound-building mice, Mus spicilegus, compatible with a monogamous mating system? Mammalia 67, 15–24.


Gubernick, D. J. , and Teferi, T. (2000). Adaptive significance of male parental care in a monogamous mammal. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 267, 147–150.
CrossRef |

Insel, T. R. , Preston, S. , and Winslow, J. T. (1995). Mating in the monogamous male: behavioral consequences. Physiol. Behav. 57, 615–627.
CrossRef | PubMed |

Ivantcheva, A. , and Cassaing, J. (1996). Divergence comportementale et isolement sexuel des souris est-européennes Mus macedonicus et Mus musculus musculus. Mammalia 60, 335–349.


Johnson, M. S. , Thomson, S. C. , and Speakman, J. R. (2001). Limits to sustained energy intake. III. Effects of concurrent pregnancy and lactation in Mus musculus. J. Exp. Biol. 204, 1947–1956.
PubMed |

Kleiman D. G., and Malcolm J. R. (1981). The evolution of male parental investment in mammals. In ‘Parental Care in Mammals’. (Eds D. Gubernick and P. Klopfer.) pp. 347–387. (Plenum Press: New York.)

König, B. (1994). Components of lifetime reproductive success in communally and solitarily nursing house mice: a laboratory study. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 34, 275–283.
CrossRef |

Marchlewska-Koj, A. (1997). Sociogenic stress and rodent reproduction. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 21, 699–703.
CrossRef | PubMed |

Milishnikov, A. N. , Rafiev, A. N. , and Muntianu, A. I. (1998). Genotypic variability in populations of moundbuilder mice Mus spicilegus Pet., 1882, at different life-cycle stages. Russ. J. Genet. 34, 785–790.


Orsini, P. , Bonhomme, F. , Britton-Davidian, J. , Croset, H. , Gerasimov, S. , and Thaler, L. (1983). Le complexe d’espèces du genre Mus en Europe Centrale et Orientale. II. Critères d’identification, répartition et caractéristiques écologiques. Z. Saugetierkd. 48, 86–95.


Patris, B. , and Baudoin, C. (1998). Female sexual preferences differ in Mus spicilegus and Mus musculus domesticus: the role of familiarization and sexual experience. Anim. Behav. 56, 1465–1470.
CrossRef | PubMed |

Patris, B. , and Baudoin, C. (2000). A comparative study of parental care between two rodent species: implications for the mating system of the mound-building mouse Mus spicilegus. Behav. Processes 51, 35–43.
CrossRef | PubMed |

Patris, B. , Gouat, P. , Jacquot, C. , Christophe, N. , and Baudoin, C. (2002). Agonistic and sociable behaviors in the mound-building mice, Mus spicilegus: a comparative study with Mus musculus domesticus. Aggress. Behav. 28, 75–84.
CrossRef |

Schradin, C. , and Pillay, N. (2003). Paternal care in the social and diurnal striped mouse (Rhabdomys pumilio): laboratory and field evidence. J. Comp. Psychol. 117, 317–324.
CrossRef | PubMed |

Schradin, C. , and Pillay, N. (2004). The striped mouse (Rhabdomys pumilio) from the succulent karoo, South Africa: a territorial group-living solitary forager with communal breeding and helpers at the nest. J. Comp. Psychol. 118, 37–47.
CrossRef | PubMed |

Schradin, C. , and Pillay, N. (2005). The influence of the father on offspring development in the striped mouse. Behav. Ecol. 16, 450–455.
CrossRef |

Sokolov, V. E. , Kotenkova, E. V. , and Michailenko, A. G. (1998). Mus spicilegus. Mamm. Species 592, 1–6.
CrossRef |

Trivers R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In ‘Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man’. (Ed. B. Campbell.) pp. 136–179. (Aldine: Chicago, IL.)

Wang, Z. , and Aragona, B. J. (2004). Neurochemical regulation of pair bonding in male prairie voles. Physiol. Behav. 83, 319–328.
CrossRef | PubMed |

Whittingham D. G., and Wood M. J. (1983). Reproductive physiology. In ‘The Mouse in Biomedical Research. Vol. 3’. (Eds H. L. Foster, J. D. Small and J. G. Fox.) pp. 137–164. (Academic Press: London.)

Williams, J. R. , Catania, K. C. , and Carter, C. S. (1992). Development of partner preferences in female prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster): the role of social and sexual experience. Horm. Behav. 26, 339–349.
CrossRef | PubMed |

Winslow, J. T. , Hastings, N. , Carter, C. S. , Harbaugh, C. R. , and Insel, T. R. (1993). A role for central vasopressin in pair bonding in monogamous prairie voles. Nature 365, 545–548.
CrossRef | PubMed |

Wittenberger, J. F. , and Tilson, R. L. (1980). The evolution of monogamy: hypothesis and evidence. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 11, 197–232.
CrossRef |

Wynne-Edwards, K. E. (1987). Evidence for obligate monogamy in the Djungarian hamster, Phodopus campbelli: pup survival under different parenting conditions. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 20, 427–437.
CrossRef |



Rent Article (via Deepdyve) Export Citation Cited By (15)

View Altmetrics