Register      Login
Reproduction, Fertility and Development Reproduction, Fertility and Development Society
Vertebrate reproductive science and technology
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Effect of culture conditions on artificial activation of porcine oocytes matured in vitro

N Yamauchi, H Sasada, S Sugawara and T Nagai

Reproduction, Fertility and Development 8(8) 1153 - 1156
Published: 1996

Abstract

The effects of culture media used and culture period for in vitro maturation of porcine oocytes on their subsequent response to chemical and electrical activation, were investigated. Activated oocytes were identified by the presence of a pronucleus(ei) or cleavage. Porcine oocytes were cultured for 24, 30, 36, 42 and 48 h in TCM199 with Earle's salts (199) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (199-FCS) before electrical stimulation. Although few oocytes were activated after 24 h and 30 h of culture (5.4% and 6.1% respectively), the percentage of activated oocytes increased significantly to 93.2% after 42 h in culture (P < 0.05); however, when the culture period was extended to 48 h, there was a significant decrease to 56.7% (P < 0.05). Oocytes were also cultured in four types of media: (1) 199-FCS; (2) 199 supplemented with 5 mg mL-1 bovine serum albumin (199-BSA); (3) Kreb's-Ringer bicarbonate solution supplemented with 10% FCS (KRB-FCS); and (4) KRB supplemented with BSA (KRB-BSA). After 42 h of culture in each medium, the oocytes were electrically activated. Although rates of maturation of oocytes cultured in the four media were similar (74.0-80.8%), all oocytes except those cultured in 199-FCS failed to be activated. In addition, oocytes were cultured for 36, 42 and 48 h in 199-FCS and then stimulated by treatment with ethanol. Significantly fewer oocytes were activated in the chemically-treated group than in the electrically-treated group. These results indicate that culture conditions used for the culture of porcine oocytes in vitro are important with respect to their subsequent response to artificial activation.

https://doi.org/10.1071/RD9961153

© CSIRO 1996

Committee on Publication Ethics


Rent Article (via Deepdyve) Export Citation Cited By (10) Get Permission

View Dimensions