Register      Login
Reproduction, Fertility and Development Reproduction, Fertility and Development Society
Vertebrate reproductive science and technology
RESEARCH ARTICLE

70 ONE-STEP CRYOPROTECTANT DILUTION FOLLOWING VITRIFICATION OF IN VITRO-PRODUCED BOVINE EMBRYOS

R. Morató A and T. Mogas A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain

Reproduction, Fertility and Development 25(1) 182-182 https://doi.org/10.1071/RDv25n1Ab70
Published: 4 December 2012

Abstract

Although slow freezing continues to be the most widely used technique of cryopreservation for bovine in vivo- and in vitro-produced embryos, vitrification has been tested in different species with good results, especially when dealing with in vitro-produced embryos. Vitrification represents a minor expense in time and equipment associated with cryopreservation compared with conventional slow freezing. However, vitrification, which is the most common method for human embryo cryopreservation, has not been widely adopted by embryo-transfer practitioners for commercial use in cattle. In general, vitrification requires gradual cryoprotectant dilution in a laboratory setting, and it is difficult to perform in the field. The objective of this study was to develop a one-step dilution method suitable for one-step bovine embryo transfer using the cryotop vitrification method. Embryos produced in vitro by standard procedures were vitrified at the blastocyst stage at Day 7 post-insemination in a mixture of 15% ethylene glycol + 15% dimethyl sulfoxide + 0.5 M sucrose using cryotop devices. Embryos were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 warming methods: (1) W3: warming was carried out following the cryotop method (1 M sucrose for 1 min, 0.5 M sucrose for 3 min, and 0 M sucrose for 6 min); (2) W1/0.5: embryos were warmed directly in 0.5 M sucrose for 3 min; and (3) W1/0: embryos were warmed directly in 0 M sucrose for 5 min. Survival rates were assessed in terms of blastocyst re-expansion, hatching, and hatched status at 3 and 24 h after warming. Data were analyzed using the statistical analysis systems package (SAS, v9.1). Data from at least 3 replicates were collected. Comparisons of vitrified–warmed blastocyst survival rates between groups were performed using the chi-squared test. The level of statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. When embryo survival was evaluated at 3 h postwarming, embryos warmed using the 3-step dilution protocol and those warmed directly in 0.5 M sucrose showed higher percentages of survival (W3: 89.8%, n = 98; W1/0.5: 87.5%, n = 64; P < 0.05) than those blastocysts that were warmed directly in 0 M sucrose (W1/0: 66.4%, n = 146). However, similar rates irrespective of the warming procedure were observed at 24 h postwarming (W3: 85.7%, W1/0.5: 88.2%, W1/0: 70.5%). Warmed in vitro-produced embryos exposed to W3 (47.6%) and W1/0.5 (35.6%) achieved higher percentages of embryos developing to the hatched blastocyst stage after 24 h of culture than those embryos warmed in W1/0 (20.4%; P < 0.05). Our results indicate that direct warming and dilution of cyotop-vitrified embryos in 0.5 M sucrose for 3 min may enable one-step bovine embryo transfer without requirement of a microscope or other laboratory equipment, simplifying the embryo-transfer procedure of vitrified embryos on farm at the same level of complexity as carrying out AI.

Support came from Spanish MEC (RZ2010-00015-0-00; AGL2010-19069) and Generalitat de Catalunya (2009 SGR 621).