Register      Login
Reproduction, Fertility and Development Reproduction, Fertility and Development Society
Vertebrate reproductive science and technology
RESEARCH ARTICLE

29 PRODUCTION OF BOVINE CLONED EMBRYOS BY NUCLEAR TRANSFER USING VITRIFIED IMMATURE OOCYTES AS RECIPIENT CYTOPLASTS

F. Forell A B , C. Feltrin A , L. C. Santos A , A. D. Vieira A B , U. M. Costa B , M. Hölker C and J. L. Rodrigues A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Laboratory of Embryology and Biotechnology of Reproduction, FAVET, UFRGS, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil;

B Department of Veterinary Medicine, CAV, UDESC, Lages, SC, Brazil;

C Institute of Animal Science, Animal Breeding and Husbandry Group, University of Bonn, Germany

Reproduction, Fertility and Development 21(1) 115-115 https://doi.org/10.1071/RDv21n1Ab29
Published: 9 December 2008

Abstract

The cryopreservation of immature oocytes is a logistic alternative to make cytoplasts available throughout the year for cloning by somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT). Oocyte cryopreservation will help to overcome hurdles related to oocyte availability, seasonality, or sanitary constraints. The objective of this experiment was to determine the efficiency of vitrification of bovine immature oocytes for use as cytoplasts to produce clone embryos. Cumulus–oocyte complexes (COCs) obtained from bovine ovaries by slicing from a local abattoir were selected and vitrified prior to maturation. Vitrification and warming solutions and exposure times were as previously described (Vieira AD et al. 2008 Rep. Dom. Anim. 43, 314–318) with minor modifications. Groups of 15 COCs were loaded in a 5-μL vitrification solution microdrop in beveled-cut straws (0.5 mL), which were plunged into N2L. Following warming, vitrified and control (non-vitrified) oocytes were in vitro-matured for 22 h and 17 h, respectively (Oliveira ATD et al. 2005 Theriogenology 64, 1559–1572). After maturation, cumulus cells were removed and oocytes were selected by the presence of a polar body. Embryo reconstruction by SCNT, carried out by standard micromanipulation procedures using fibroblast cells from adult origin, and in vitro culture to the blastocyst stage (Day 7) were based on our established procedures (Forell F et al. 2008 Acta Sci. Vet. 36, 141–148). Data regarding oocyte recovery following cumulus cell removal, oocyte survival after micromanipulation, and maturation, fusion, cleavage (Day 2), and blastocyst (Day 7) rates were analyzed by the chi-square test. Oocyte recovery (73.0%, n = 558/764 v. 91.4%, n = 529/579), maturation (46.8%, n = 261/558 v. 65.8%, n = 348/529) and cleavage (47.2%, n = 60/127 v. 60.2%, n = 77/128) rates were lower in the vitrified than in the non-vitrified group, respectively (P < 0.05). Conversely, oocyte survival after micromanipulation (77.8% and 78.4%) and fusion (82.1% and 82.3%) and blastocyst (16.7%, 10/60 v. 23.4%, n = 18/77) rates were similar between vitrified and non-vitrified groups. However, the overall efficiency (blastocysts produced from selected COCs) was 3.4-fold lower for vitrified oocytes than controls. In conclusion, the vitrification of immature bovine oocytes was proven as a valuable procedure for the production of blastocysts by SCNT, providing that a strict selection is made following warming, being an alternative resource either for the use of large numbers of oocytes obtained from slaughterhouse ovaries or to overcome seasonal variations in oocyte supply for use in animal cloning.

This work was supported by the Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq).