Register      Login
Reproduction, Fertility and Development Reproduction, Fertility and Development Society
Vertebrate reproductive science and technology
RESEARCH ARTICLE

75 ADDITION OF HYALURONAN TO A VITRIFICATION SOLUTION FOR IMMATURE BOVINE OOCYTES SELECTED BY BRILLIANT CRESYL BLUE

P. Rodriguez Villamil A , F. Ongaratto A , M. Fernandez Taranco B and G. A. Bó A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Instituto de Reproduccion Animal Cordoba (IRAC), Cordoba, Argentina;

B Instituto de Ciencias Basicas, Carrera de Medicina Veterinaria, Universidad Nacional de Villa Maria, Argentina

Reproduction, Fertility and Development 25(1) 185-185 https://doi.org/10.1071/RDv25n1Ab75
Published: 4 December 2012

Abstract

An experiment was designed to evaluate the effect of brilliant cresyl blue (BCB) selection of immature oocytes and the addition of sodium hyaluronate (HA) to the vitrification solution on survival rates of bovine oocytes vitrified using solid-phase vitrification. Bovine cumulus–oocyte complexes (COC; n = 716) obtained from slaughterhouse ovaries were used in 6 replicates. Cumulus–oocyte complexes were washed in tissue culture medium 199 (TCM-199) and randomly allocated to 2 groups to be exposed to BCB stain (Sigma Chemical Company, St. Louis, MO, USA) for 90 min as described by Alm et al. (2005 Theriogenology 63, 2194–2205) or (control) maintained in Vigro holding medium (Bioniche Animal Health, Belleville, Canada) for 90 min (n = 220). Cumulus–oocyte complexes in the BCB group were selected based on their response to BCB as BCB+ (colored, n = 248) or BCB– (colorless, n = 248), whereas those in the control group were selected morphologically as described by Rodríguez-González et al. (2002 Theriogenology 57, 1397–1409). Oocytes from both BCB groups and 100 oocytes in the control group were vitrified by solid-phase vitrification as previously described by Rodriguez et al. (2012 Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 24, 132). The remaining 120 oocytes in the control group were not vitrified and were matured, fertilized, and cultured in vitro (in SOFaa in a controlled atmosphere) for 7 days. Vitrified oocytes were exposed to 10% ethylene glycol for 10 min, and 20% ethylene glycol + 0.2-M trehalose for 30 s, and then were subdivided to be exposed to 30% ethylene glycol + 0.5-M trehalose with or without 0.1 mg mL–1 HA (MAP 5, Bioniche Animal Health). Vitrified oocytes were stored in liquid nitrogen for at least one week and then placed directly into a 0.5-M sucrose solution (in TCM 199) at 37°C for 5 min, 0.25 M of sucrose for another 5 min, and finally TCM-199 and matured, fertilized, and cultured. Development rates (i.e. proportion of blastocysts) were examined on Day 7 after fertilization. Proportional data were first transformed by square root and then analyzed by ANOVA to detect the effect of replicate, type of oocyte (BCB+, BCB–, controls), and vitrified with or without HA or not vitrified as main effects, using the software Infostat (UNC, Argentina, 2010). There was a significant effect of oocyte type on blastocyst rate (P < 0.01) following vitrification (BCB+, 6.4 ± 0.4%. v. BCB–, 1.6 ± 0.6%). Control oocytes (not exposed to BCB) resulted in 3.0 ± 2.0% blastocysts following vitrification, which was lower to that obtained with the BCB+ oocytes. Vitrification also influenced development rates (3.0 ± 2.0 v. 32.0 ± 1.3%) for blastocysts produced from vitrified v. nonvitrified oocytes, respectively (P < 0.01). Furthermore, the use of HA in the vitrification solutions did not have a significant effect on development rates (4.7 ± 0.9 v. 3.3 ± 0.9%, for blastocysts obtained from vitrified oocytes with or without HA, respectively). In conclusion, the selection of oocytes by BCB increased the in vitro development rates of vitrified immature oocytes, whereas the use of HA in the vitrification solution did not improve the survival rates of vitrified oocytes.