Register      Login
The Rangeland Journal The Rangeland Journal Society
Journal of the Australian Rangeland Society
RESEARCH ARTICLE

A life cycle assessment approach to quantifying greenhouse gas emissions from land-use change for beef production in eastern Australia

Beverley K. Henry A B E , D. Butler C and S. G. Wiedemann D
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Institute for Future Environments, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Qld 4000, Australia.

B The University of Sydney, Faculty of Agriculture and Environment, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.

C O2 Ecology Pty Ltd, 48 Wharf Street, Kangaroo Point, Qld 4169, Australia.

D FSA Consulting, 11 Clifford Street, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia.

E Corresponding author. Email: beverley.henry@qut.edu.au

The Rangeland Journal 37(3) 273-283 https://doi.org/10.1071/RJ14112
Submitted: 15 September 2014  Accepted: 30 March 2015   Published: 8 May 2015

Abstract

In life cycle assessment studies, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from direct land-use change have been estimated to make a significant contribution to the global warming potential of agricultural products. However, these estimates have a high uncertainty due to the complexity of data requirements and difficulty in attribution of land-use change. This paper presents estimates of GHG emissions from direct land-use change from native woodland to grazing land for two beef production regions in eastern Australia, which were the subject of a multi-impact life cycle assessment study for premium beef production. Spatially- and temporally consistent datasets were derived for areas of forest cover and biomass carbon stocks using published remotely sensed tree-cover data and regionally applicable allometric equations consistent with Australia’s national GHG inventory report. Standard life cycle assessment methodology was used to estimate GHG emissions and removals from direct land-use change attributed to beef production. For the northern-central New South Wales region of Australia estimates ranged from a net emission of 0.03 t CO2-e ha–1 year–1 to net removal of 0.12 t CO2-e ha–1 year–1 using low and high scenarios, respectively, for sequestration in regrowing forests. For the same period (1990–2010), the study region in southern-central Queensland was estimated to have net emissions from land-use change in the range of 0.45–0.25 t CO2-e ha–1 year–1. The difference between regions reflects continuation of higher rates of deforestation in Queensland until strict regulation in 2006 whereas native vegetation protection laws were introduced earlier in New South Wales. On the basis of liveweight produced at the farm-gate, emissions from direct land-use change for 1990–2010 were comparable in magnitude to those from other on-farm sources, which were dominated by enteric methane. However, calculation of land-use change impacts for the Queensland region for a period starting 2006, gave a range from net emissions of 0.11 t CO2-e ha–1 year–1 to net removals of 0.07 t CO2-e ha–1 year–1. This study demonstrated a method for deriving spatially- and temporally consistent datasets to improve estimates for direct land-use change impacts in life cycle assessment. It identified areas of uncertainty, including rates of sequestration in woody regrowth and impacts of land-use change on soil carbon stocks in grazed woodlands, but also showed the potential for direct land-use change to represent a net sink for GHG.

Additional keywords: carbon sequestration, grazed woodlands, soil carbon stocks, woody regrowth.


References

ABARES (2012). ‘Australian Farm Survey Results 2009–10 to 2011–12.’ (Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences: Canberra, ACT.)

ABARES (2013). ‘Agricultural Commodity Statistics 2013.’ (Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences: Canberra, ACT.)

ABS (2012). ‘Agricultural Commodities 2011–12.’ (Australian Bureau of Statistics: Canberra, ACT.)

ABS (2014). ‘Livestock Products, Australia.’ ABS Catalogue No. 7215.0. (Australian Bureau of Statistics: Canberra, ACT.)

Accad, A., Neldner, V. J., Wilson, B. A., and Niehus, R. E. (2013). ‘Remnant Vegetation in Queensland. Analysis of Remnant Vegetation 1997–2011, Including Regional Ecosystem Information.’ (Queensland Department of Science, Information Technology, Innovation and the Arts: Brisbane, Qld.)

Allen, D. E., Pringle, M. J., Bray, S., Hall, T. J., O’Reagain, P. O., Phelps, D., Cobon, D. H., Bloesch, P. M., and Dalal, R. C. (2013). What determines soil organic carbon stocks in the grazing lands of north-eastern Australia? Soil Research 51, 695–706.
What determines soil organic carbon stocks in the grazing lands of north-eastern Australia?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXhvF2ktbbM&md5=6e299f6112506383fdbe3a6ef2762ab4CAS |

Beddington, J., Asaduzzaman, M., Fernandez, A., Clark, M., Guillou, M., Jahn, M., Erda, L., Mamo, T., Van Bo, N., Nobre, C. A., Scholes, R., Sharma, R., and Wakhungu, J. (2011). ‘Achieving Food Security in the Face of Climate Change: Summary for Policy-makers From the Commission on Sustainable Agriculture and Climate Change.’ (CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS): Copenhagen, Denmark.)

Bray, S., Doran-Browne, N., and O’Reagain, P. (2014). Northern Australian pasture and beef systems. 1. Net carbon position. Animal Production Science 54, 1988–1994.
Northern Australian pasture and beef systems. 1. Net carbon position.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2cXhvVGgsLfI&md5=0d205ff5ca21f569bd439c3fda0b2709CAS |

BSI (2012). ‘Publicly Available Specification on Assessing the Life-cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Goods and Services (PAS2050).’ (British Standards Institute: London, UK.)

Burrows, W. H., Henry, B. K., Back, P. V., Hoffman, M. B., Tait, L. J., Anderson, E. R., Menke, N., Danaher, T., Carter, J. O., and McKeon, G. M. (2002). Growth and carbon stock change in eucalypt woodland stands in north-east Australia: ecological and greenhouse sink implications. Global Change Biology 8, 769–784.
Growth and carbon stock change in eucalypt woodland stands in north-east Australia: ecological and greenhouse sink implications.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cederberg, C., Persson, U. M., Neovius, K., Molander, S., and Clift, R. (2011). Including carbon emissions from deforestation in the carbon footprint of Brazilian beef. Environmental Science & Technology 45, 1773–1779.
Including carbon emissions from deforestation in the carbon footprint of Brazilian beef.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXhtlajtLo%3D&md5=49f8005d3c5ff016dbb3480e2ac8f2c1CAS |

Commonwealth of Australia (2014). ‘Australian National Greenhouse Accounts: National Inventory Report 2012, Vol. 2.’ (Department of Environment: Canberra, ACT.)

Dalal, R. C., and Mayer, R. J. (1986). Long-term trends in fertility of soils under continuous cultivation and cereal cropping in southern Queensland. II. Total organic carbon and its rate of loss from the soil profile. Australian Journal of Soil Research 24, 281–292.
Long-term trends in fertility of soils under continuous cultivation and cereal cropping in southern Queensland. II. Total organic carbon and its rate of loss from the soil profile.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaL28XkvFKmsLw%3D&md5=98f66a129802ac6c6e8bf5a98c9f3b2dCAS |

DIICCSRTE (2013). ‘Australian National Greenhouse Accounts: National Inventory Report 2011, Volume 2.’ (Department of Industry, Innovation, Climate Change, Science, Research and Tertiary Education: Canberra, ACT.)

Dillon, M., McNellie, M., and Olivier, I. (2011). ‘Assessing the extent of native vegetation in NSW, monitoring, evaluation and reporting program.’ Technical report series. (Office of Environment and Heritage: Sydney, NSW.) Available at: www.environment.nsw.gov.au/soc/stateofthecatchmentsreport.htm (accessed 9 March 2015).

DSITIA (2013). ‘Land cover change in Queensland 2010–11: a state-wide land cover and trees study (SLATS) report.’ (Queensland Department of Science, Information Technology, Innovation and the Arts: Brisbane, Qld.) Available at: www.qld.gov.au/environment/land/vegetation/mapping/slats-reports/ (accessed 9 March 2015).

FAO (2011). ‘The State of Food Insecurity in the World.’ (Food and Agriculture Organisation: Rome, Italy.)

FAO (2013). ‘Land resources – sustainable land management.’ Available at: www.fao.org/nr/land/sustainable-land-management/en/ (accessed 11 November 2013).

Foley, J. A., DeFries, R., Asner, G. P., Barford, C., Bonan, G., Carpenter, S. R., Chapin, F. S., Coe, M. T., Daily, G. C., Gibbs, H. K., Helkowski, J. H., Holloway, T., Howard, E. A., Kucharik, C. J., Monfreda, C., Patz, J. A., Prentice, C., Ramankutty, N., and Snyder, P. K. (2005). Global consequences of land use. Science 309, 570–574.
Global consequences of land use.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXmsFChtrs%3D&md5=83ab1df121ce32f4823055170ba3494eCAS | 16040698PubMed |

Gibbs, H. K., Ruesch, A. S., Achard, F., Clayton, M. K., Holmgren, P., Ramankutty, N., and Foley, J. A. (2010). Tropical forests were the primary sources of new agricultural land in the 1980s and 1990s. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107, 16732–16737.
Tropical forests were the primary sources of new agricultural land in the 1980s and 1990s.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXht1ais7vE&md5=f4ffc5e24135bfb43588a4c4ae9ec21dCAS | 20807750PubMed |

Guo, L. B., and Gifford, R. M. (2002). Soil carbon stocks and land use change: a meta-analysis. Global Change Biology 8, 345–360.
Soil carbon stocks and land use change: a meta-analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Harris-Adams, K., Townsend, P., and Lawson, K. (2012). ‘Native vegetation management on agricultural land.’ ABARES research report 12.10. (Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences: Canberra, ACT.)

Henry, B. K., Butler, D., Specht, A., and Phelps, C. (2014). Accounting for on-farm carbon sequestration in LCA studies for agricultural products. In: ‘Proceedings 3rd LCANZ and NZLCM Centre Conference. Life Cycle Assessment. Life Cycle Thinking and Policy: Towards a Sustainable Society’. 2–3 September 2014. Wellington, New Zealand. pp. 92–96. (Life Cycle Association of New Zealand) http://lcaconference.org.nz/2014-proceedings

IPCC (2014). ‘Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects.’ Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (Eds C. B. Field, V. R. Barros, D. J. Dokken, K. J. Mach, M. D. Mastrandrea, T. E. Bilir, M. Chatterjee, K. L. Ebi, Y. O. Estrada, R. C. Genova, B. Girma, E. S. Kissel, A. N. Levy, S. MacCracken, P. R. Mastrandrea and L. L.White.) (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK)

ISO (2013). ‘ISO/TS 14067 greenhouse gases: carbon footprint of products – requirements and guidelines for quantification and communication.’ ISO/TC 207/SC 7. (ISO: Geneva, Switzerland.)

Koellner, T., de Baan, L., Beck, T., Brandão, M., Civit, B., Margni, M., Milà i Canals, L., Saad, R., Maia de Souza, D., and Müller-Wenk, R. (2013). UNEP-SETAC guideline on global land use impact assessment on biodiversity and ecosystem services in LCA. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 18, 1188–1202.
UNEP-SETAC guideline on global land use impact assessment on biodiversity and ecosystem services in LCA.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lal, R., and Follett, R. F. (2009). ‘Soil Carbon Sequestration and the Greenhouse Effect.’ Special Publication No. 57. (Soil Science Society of America: Madison, WI.)

Lambin, E. F., and Meyfroidt, P. (2011). Global land use change, economic globalization, and the looming land scarcity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108, 3465–3472.
Global land use change, economic globalization, and the looming land scarcity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXivFGlu70%3D&md5=e11dff978aa443a381918a90bb1fc9a5CAS | 21321211PubMed |

LEAP (2014). ‘Environmental performance of animal feed supply chains: Guidelines for quantification.’ Livestock Environmental Assessment and Performance Partnership. (FAO: Rome, Italy.)

Lesslie, R. G., and Mewett, J. (2013). ‘Land use and management: the Australian context.’ ABARES research report 13.1. (Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences: Canberra, ACT.)

Masuda, T., and Goldsmith, P. D. (2009). World soybean production: area harvested, yield, and long-term projections. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 12, 143–162.

MLA (2014). ‘Australia’s beef industry.’ (Meat and Livestock Australia: North Sydney). Available at: www.mla.com.au/Cattle-sheep-and-goat-industries/Industry-overview/Cattle (accessed 9 March 2015).

OEH (2011). ‘NSW Annual Report on Native Vegetation 2010.’ (Office of Environment and Heritage, New South Wales Government: Sydney.) Available at: www.environment.nsw.gov.au/resources/vegetation/110685NVAR2010.pdf (accessed 9 March 2015).

Penman, T. D., Law, B. S., and Ximenes, F. (2010). A proposal for accounting for biodiversity in life cycle assessment. Biodiversity and Conservation 19, 3245–3254.
A proposal for accounting for biodiversity in life cycle assessment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Polasky, S., Nelson, E., Pennington, D., and Johnson, K. A. (2011). The impact of land-use change on ecosystem services, biodiversity and returns to landowners: a case study in the State of Minnesota. Environmental and Resource Economics 48, 219–242.
The impact of land-use change on ecosystem services, biodiversity and returns to landowners: a case study in the State of Minnesota.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Richards, G., and Brack, C. (2004). A continental biomass stock and stock change estimation approach for Australia. Australian Forestry 67, 284–288.
A continental biomass stock and stock change estimation approach for Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Rulli, M. C., Saviori, A., and D’Odorico, P. (2013). Global land and water grabbing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110, 892–897.
Global land and water grabbing.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXhs1yhsLk%3D&md5=d69b281d34121440a4ab72a407540898CAS | 23284174PubMed |

Sanderman, J., Farquharson, R., and Baldock, J. A. (2010). ‘Soil carbon sequestration potential: a review for Australian agriculture.’ A report to the Australian Department of Climate Change. (Department of Environment: Canberra, ACT.) Available at: www.csiro.au/resources/Soil-Carbon-Sequestration-Potential-Report.html (accessed 9 March 2015).

Specht, A., and West, P. W. (2003). Estimation of biomass and sequestered carbon on farm forest plantations in northern New South Wales, Australia. Biomass and Bioenergy 25, 363–379.
Estimation of biomass and sequestered carbon on farm forest plantations in northern New South Wales, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

State of the Environment Committee (2011). ‘Australia State of the Environment 2011.’ Independent report to the Australian Government Minister for Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities. (DSEWPaC: Canberra, ACT.)

Strassburg, B. B. N., Rodrigues, A. S. L., Gusti, M., Balmford, A., Fritz, S., Obersteiner, M., Turner, R. K., and Brooks, T. M. (2012). Impacts of incentives to reduce emissions from deforestation on global species extinctions. Nature Climate Change 2, 350–355.
Impacts of incentives to reduce emissions from deforestation on global species extinctions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38Xmt1Cruro%3D&md5=c839bad5255147f36ca7e1f1c04a4854CAS |

Tilman, D., Balzer, C., Hill, J., and Befort, B. L. (2011). Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108, 20260–20264.
Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXhs1yqsbnM&md5=ad710adfbdc58f8108ee39184144621bCAS | 22106295PubMed |

van der Werf, G. R., Morton, D. C., deFries, R. S., Oliver, J. G. J., Kasibhatla, P. S., Jackson, R. B., Collatz, G. J., and Randerson, J. T. (2009). CO2 emissions from forest loss. Nature Geoscience 2, 737–738.
CO2 emissions from forest loss.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXhtlGitLfO&md5=0de1d41f7d490ed7e884e0c3055575b3CAS |

Vermeulen, S. J., Campbell, B. M., and Ingram, J. S. (2012). Climate change and food systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 37, 195–222.
Climate change and food systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wiedemann, S. G., McGahan, E. J., Murphy, C. M., and Yan, M.-J. (2015a). Resource use and environmental impacts from beef production in eastern Australia investigated using life cycle assessment. Animal Production Science 55, .
Resource use and environmental impacts from beef production in eastern Australia investigated using life cycle assessment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wiedemann, S. G., McGahan, E. J., Murphy, C. M., Yan, M.-J., Henry, B. K., Thoma, G., and Ledgard, S. F. (2015b). Environmental impacts and resource use of Australian beef and lamb exported to the USA determined using life cycle assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production 94, 67–75.
Environmental impacts and resource use of Australian beef and lamb exported to the USA determined using life cycle assessment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Young, R., Wilson, B. R., McLeod, M., and Alston, C. (2005). Carbon storage in the soils and vegetation of contrasting land uses in northern New South Wales, Australia. Australian Journal of Soil Research 43, 21–31.
Carbon storage in the soils and vegetation of contrasting land uses in northern New South Wales, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXhtl2ku7c%3D&md5=bc619727c4f02f918390e13e7ab44bb9CAS |