Register      Login
Sexual Health Sexual Health Society
Publishing on sexual health from the widest perspective
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Delayed diagnosis of HIV: missed opportunities and triggers for testing in the Australian Capital Territory

Elizabeth A. McDonald A C , Marian J. Currie B and Francis J. Bowden B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A University of Sydney Medical Program, The Canberra Clinical School, The Canberra Hospital, PO Box 11, Woden, ACT 2606, Australia.

B Academic Unit of Internal Medicine, Australian National University Medical School, Canberra Clinical School, The Canberra Hospital, PO Box 11, Woden, ACT 2606, Australia.

C Corresponding author. Email: mcdonald_elizabeth@hotmail.com

Sexual Health 3(4) 291-295 https://doi.org/10.1071/SH06022
Submitted: 22 March 2006  Accepted: 2 August 2006   Published: 17 November 2006

Abstract

Background: To determine (i) the rate of delayed HIV diagnosis; (ii) the missed opportunities for HIV diagnosis; and (iii) to identify who initiates HIV testing and what triggers them to do so. Methods: An analysis of the case records of all HIV-positive patients who attended Canberra Sexual Health Centre (CSHC) between 1985 and 2005 was conducted. Results: During the study period, 319/355 CSHC patients diagnosed with HIV had sufficient data to allow analysis regarding the timeliness of their diagnosis. Of these, 52 (16.3%) received a delayed diagnosis. The rate of delayed diagnosis was 9.7% (95% CI 5.1–15.3) in the 1980s and 25.6% (95% CI 13–42.1) between 2000 and 2004. There were no statistically significant differences in sociodemographic or behavioural characteristics between patients with delayed and timely HIV diagnoses. To determine who initiated testing, and if there were missed opportunities for testing, the records of CSHC patients diagnosed with HIV between 1995 and 2005 were examined. Of the 115 people diagnosed in this period, only 71 had documentation concerning missed opportunities for testing. Forty-one of these (58%) had been in contact with a health professional while infected, but before their diagnosis of HIV and 39/41 (95%) had a significant risk factor in their history that could have initiated an HIV test. Clinicians initiated testing for 43.5% of the patients, 11.3% were identified through contact tracing and only 28.7% were self referred for testing. Conclusions: Late diagnosis of HIV is common in the Australian Capital Territory and may have increased over time. Clinicians need to be aware of the sometimes-subtle manifestations of early and late HIV infection and have a lower threshold for HIV antibody testing.

Additional keywords: blood products, CD4+ count, illness, intravenous drug use, men who have sex with men, seroconversion.


Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the staff of Canberra Sexual Health Centre for assistance in obtaining the data.


References


[1] Castilla J,  Sobrino P,  De La Fuente L,  Noguer I,  Guerra L,  Parras F. Late diagnosis of HIV infection in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy: consequences for AIDS incidence. AIDS 2002; 16 1945–51.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[2] Krentz HB,  Auld MC,  Gill MJ. The high cost of medical care for patients who present late (CD4 < 200 cells/microL) with HIV infection. HIV Med 2004; 5 93–8.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[3] Gillieatt SJ,  Mallal SA,  French MA,  Dawkins RL. Epidemiology of late presentation of HIV infection in Western Australia. Med J Aust 1992; 157(2): 117–8.
PubMed |

[4] Valdiserri RO,  Holtgrave DR,  West GR. Promoting early HIV diagnosis and entry into care. AIDS 1999; 13(17): 2317–30.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[5] Samet JH,  Freedberg KA,  Savetsky JB,  Sullivan LM,  Stein MD. Understanding delay to medical care for HIV infection: the long-term non-presenter. AIDS 2001; 15(1): 77–85.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[6] Epstein RM,  Morse DS,  Frankel RM,  Frarey L,  Anderson K,  Beckman HB. Awkward moments in patient-physician communication about HIV risk. Ann Intern Med 1998; 128 435–42.
PubMed |

[7] Fortenberry JD,  McFarlance M,  Bleakley A,  Bull S,  Fishbein M,  Grimley DM,  Malotte CK,  Stoner BP. Relationships of stigma and shame to gonorrhea and HIV screening. Am J Public Health 2002; 92(3): 378–80.
PubMed |

[8] McDonald AM,  Li Y,  Dore GJ,  Ree H,  Kaldor JM. Late HIV presentation among AIDS cases in Australia, 1992–2001. Aust N Z J Public Health 2003; 27(6): 608–13.
PubMed |

[9] Wong KH,  Lee SS,  Low KH,  Wan WY. Temporal trend and factors associated with late HIV diagnosis in Hong Kong, a low HIV prevalence locality. AIDS Patient Care STDS 2003; 17(9): 461–9.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[10] Rotily M,  Bentz L,  Pradier C,  Obadia Y,  Cavailler P. Factors related to delayed diagnosis of HIV infection in southeastern France, EVALVIH group. Int J STD AIDS 2000; 11(8): 531–5.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[11] Chadborn TR,  Baster K,  Delpech VC,  Sabin CA,  Sinka K,  Rice BD,  Evans BG. No time to wait: how many HIV- infected homosexual men are diagnosed late and consequently die? (England and Wales 1993–2002). AIDS 2005; 19(5): 513–20.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[12] Brannstrom J,  Akerlund B,  Arneborn M,  Blaxhult A,  Giesecke J. Patients unaware of their HIV infection until AIDS diagnosis in Sweden 1996–2002 – a remaining problem in the highly active antiretroviral therapy era. Int J STD AIDS 2005; 16(10): 702–6.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[13] STATA: Statistics/Data Analysis. College Station, TX: Stata Corporation; 2000.

[14] Gilbart VL,  Dougan S,  Sinka K,  Evans BG. Late diagnosis of HIV infection among individuals with low, unrecognised or unacknowledged risks in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. AIDS Care 2006; 18(2): 133–9.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[15] Do TD,  Chen S,  McFarland W,  Secura GM,  Behel SK,  MacKellar DA,  Valleroy LA,  Cho KH. HIV testing patterns and unrecognized HIV infection among young Asian and Pacific Islander men who have sex with men in San Francisco. AIDS Educ Prev 2005; 17(6): 540–54.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[16] Sullivan AK,  Curtis H,  Sabin CA,  Johnson MA. Newly diagnosed HIV infections: review in UK and Ireland. BMJ 2005; 330 1301–2.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[17] Fleming DT,  Wasserheit JN.. From epidemiological synergy to public health policy and practice: the contribution of other sexually transmitted diseases to sexual transmission of HIV infection. Sex Transm Infect 1999; 75(1): 3–17.
PubMed |

[18] Royce RA,  Sena A,  Cates W,  Cohen MS. Sexual transmission of HIV. N Engl J Med 1997; 336 1072–8.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[19] Wortley PM,  Chu SY,  Diaz T,  Ward JW,  Doyle B,  Davidson AJ,  Checko PJ, et al. HIV testing patterns: where, why and when were persons with AIDS tested for HIV? AIDS 1995; 9 487–92.
PubMed |

[20] Samet JH,  Winter MR,  Grant L,  Hingson R. Factors associated with HIV testing among sexually active adolescents: a Massachusetts survey. Pediatrics 1997; 100 371–7.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[21] Gerbert B,  Bleecker T,  Bernzweig J. Is anybody talking to physicians about acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and sex? A national survey of patients. Arch Fam Med 1993; 2(1): 45–51.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[22] Freedberg KA,  Samet JH. Think HIV: why physicians should lower their threshold for HIV testing. Arch Intern Med 1999; 159(17): 1994–2000.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |