Register      Login
Sexual Health Sexual Health Society
Publishing on sexual health from the widest perspective
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Young women’s misperceptions about sexually transmissible infection testing: a ‘clean and clear’ misunderstanding

Sara K. Head A E , Richard A. Crosby A B , Lydia A. Shrier C and Gregory R. Moore D
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A College of Public Health, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA.

B Rural Center for AIDS/STD Prevention, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA.

C Division of Adolescent/Young Adult Medicine, Children’s Hospital Boston/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

D University Health Services, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA.

E Corresponding author. Email: sara.head@gmail.com

Sexual Health 4(4) 273-275 https://doi.org/10.1071/SH07060
Submitted: 28 July 2007  Accepted: 29 August 2007   Published: 23 November 2007

Abstract

Background: This exploratory study investigated young women’s perceptions of sexually transmissible infection (STI) testing received during gynaecological care. Correlates of the incorrect perception that STI testing occurred were assessed. Methods: Cross-sectional study of sexually active young women, age 18–24 years, attending a university healthcare setting for gynaecological care (n = 109). Two hundred and four women were approached and 87 were ineligible; of the remaining 117, 93.2% chose to enrol. Results: Of the women enrolled, 25.7% falsely perceived that they were STI tested (labelled ‘clean and clear’). Only approximately one in seven (14.7%) accurately understood the STI for which they were tested. In multivariate analyses, controlling for race, STI symptoms, depression, number of lifetime visits to the gynaecologist, and suspicion of current STI, three variables were significant: minority race (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 4.84, confidence interval (CI) = 1.38–16.96, P = 0.01), earlier age at sexual debut (AOR = 4.67, CI = 1.73–12.57, P = 0.002), and previous STI diagnosis (AOR = 3.38, CI = 1.07–10.66, P = 0.04). Comment: The findings suggest that many young women may have an inaccurate understanding of the STI testing they undergo during gynaecological care and may operate under the misperception they are ‘clean and clear’ of STI. Women with said misperception were more likely to be of minority race and report relatively earlier age of sexual debut and previous STI diagnosis. Further investigation is warranted to determine whether the ‘clean and clear’ misperception influences young women’s sexual risk behaviour.

Additional keywords: communication, gynaecology, patient eduction, screening, sexual behaviour.


Acknowledgements

This research was funded through a Developed Dimensions International Endowment provided to Dr Richard Crosby.


References


[1] Eng TR , Butler WT , eds. The hidden epidemic: confronting sexually transmitted diseases. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1997.

[2] Weinstock H,  Berman S,  Cates W. Sexually transmitted diseases among American youth: incidence and prevalence estimates, 2000. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2004; 36 6–10.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[3] Workowski KA,  Berman SM. Sexually transmitted disease treatment guidelines, 2006. MMWR Recomm Rep 2006; 55 1–94.
PubMed |

[4] American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Sexually transmitted diseases in adolescents. ACOG Community Opinion. No. 301. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 104 891–8.
PubMed |

[5] US Preventive Services Task Force Screening for chlamydial infection. Am J Prev Med 2001; 20 90–9.


[6] Elster AB. Comparison of recommendations for adolescent clinical preventive services developed by national organizations. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1998; 152 193–8.
PubMed |

[7] Elster AB , Kuznets NJ . AMA guidelines for adolescent preventive services (GAPS): recommendations and rationale. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1994.

[8] Scholes D,  Stergachis A,  Heidrich FE,  Andrilla H,  Holmes KK,  Stamm WE. Prevention of pelvic inflammatory disease by screening for cervical chlamydial infection. N Engl J Med 1996; 334 1362–6.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[9] Stergachis A,  Scholes D,  Heidrich FE,  Heidrich FE,  Sherer DM,  Holmes KK, et al. Selective screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in a primary care population of women. Am J Epidemiol 1993; 138 143–53.
PubMed |

[10] Miller WC,  Hoffman IF,  O’Dowd JO,  McPherson JT,  Privette A,  Schmitz JL, et al. Selective screening for chlamydial infection: which criteria to use. Am J Prev Med 2000; 18 115–22.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[11] Marrazzo JM,  Fine D,  Celum CL,  DeLisle S,  Handsfield HH. Selective screening for chamydial infection in women: a comparison of three sets of criteria. Fam Plann Perspect 1997; 29 158–62.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[12] Addis DG,  Vaughn ML,  Ludka D,  Pfister J,  Davis JP. Decreased prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis infection associated with a selective screening program in family planning clinics in Wisconsin. Sex Transm Dis 1993; 20 28–34.


[13] Sellors JW,  Pickard L,  Gafni A,  Goldsmith CH,  Jang D,  Mahony JB, et al. Effectiveness and efficiency of selective vs universal screening for chlamydial infection in sexually active young women. Arch Intern Med 1992; 152 1837–44.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[14] Weinstein ND . Perception of personal susceptibility to harm. In: VM Mays, GW Albee, SF Schneider (eds). Primary prevention of AIDS. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 1989. pp. 142–167.