Register      Login
Sexual Health Sexual Health Society
Publishing on sexual health from the widest perspective
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > SH > SH09146
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 7(4)

Computer-assisted survey of attitudes to HIV and sexually transmissible infection partner notification in HIV-positive men who have sex with men

Clare L. N. Woodward A C , Sherie Roedling A , Simon G. Edwards A , Alice Armstrong A and John Richens B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A The Mortimer Market Centre, Camden PCT, London WC1I 6JB, UK.

B Royal Free and University College Medical School, London NW3 2PF, UK.

C Corresponding author. Email: clare.woodward@camdenpct.nhs.uk

Sexual Health 7(4) 460-462 https://doi.org/10.1071/SH09146
Submitted: 15 December 2009  Accepted: 20 April 2010   Published: 10 November 2010

Abstract

Background: HIV infection continues to rise in men who have sex with men (MSM) in the UK. Of concern are the high rates of sexually transmissible infections (STI) among HIV-positive MSM, as this is associated with onward HIV transmission. Conventional partner notification (PN) may be limited in this group by the presence of multiple non-contactable partners and the fear of breach of HIV status. Methods: We explored attitudes to PN in HIV-positive MSM having an STI screen using a computer-assisted self interview. Results and Conclusion: Our study shows HIV+ MSM, rate conventional methods of PN highly (median rating 8/10) but are also supportive of new approaches to PN particularly anonymous email when linked to website information. They would also be open to targeted interventions such as peer recruitment.

Additional keywords: health adviser, peer recruitment.


References


[1] Health Protection Agency. Testing times – HIV and other sexually transmitted infections in the United Kingdom. London: Health Protection Agency; 2007.

[2] World Health Organization. Questions and answers on reporting, partner notification and disclosure of HIV serostatus and/or AIDS, public health and human rights implications. Geneva: UNAIDS/WHO; June 1999.

[3] Mimiaga MJ,  Tetu AM,  Gortmaker S,  Koenen K,  Fair A,  Novak D, et al. HIV and STD status among MSM and attitudes about internet partner notification for STD exposure. Sex Transm Dis 2008; 35 111–6.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[4] Tomnay JE,  Pitts MK,  Fairley CK. New technology and partner notification – why aren’t we using them? Int J STD AIDS 2005; 16 19–22.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed |

[5] Bloomfield PJ,  Steiner KC,  Kent CK,  Klausner JD. Repeat chlamydia screening by mail, San Francisco. Sex Transm Infect 2003; 79 28–30.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed |

[6] Ghanem K,  Hutton H,  Zenilman J,  Zimba R,  Erbelding E. Audio computer assisted self interview and face to face interview modes in assessing response bias among STD clinic patients. Sex Transm Infect 2005; 81 421–5.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed |

[7] Hogben M,  Paffel J,  Broussard D,  Wolf W,  Kenny K,  Ruben S, et al. Syphilis partner notification with men who have sex with men: a review and commentary. Sex Transm Dis 2005; 32(Suppl): S43–7.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed |

[8] Liau A,  Millett G,  Marks G. Meta-analytic examination of online sex-seeking and sexual risk behaviour among men who have sex with men. Sex Transm Dis 2006; 33 576–84.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[9] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Recommendations for partner services programs for HIV infection, syphilis, gonorrhoea, and chlamydial infection. MMWR Early Release 2008; 57 44–45.