Register      Login
Sexual Health Sexual Health Society
Publishing on sexual health from the widest perspective
RESEARCH ARTICLE

The effects of translating the Multidimensional Sexuality Questionnaire from English to Mandarin: a test of reliability and validity

Peng Tao A B E , Rosemary Coates B , Yun Zhao C and Bruce Maycock D
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Research and Education Center in Sexual Health, Harbin Medical University, Hei Longjiang 15001, China.

B Department of Sexology, School of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6845, Australia.

C Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6845, Australia.

D Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6845, Australia.

E Corresponding author. Email: pengtao1@china.com

Sexual Health 9(4) 304-313 https://doi.org/10.1071/SH11008
Submitted: 21 January 2011  Accepted: 30 October 2011   Published: 13 January 2012

Abstract

Background: In China, sexuality studies using validated psychosexual instruments are limited, with no valid Mandarin language version of a sexuality inventory with psychometric properties available for use. Thus, the Mandarin version of the Multidimensional Sexuality Questionnaire (M-MSQ), comprising four subscales, originating from the Multidimensional Sexuality Questionnaire, was tested for its psychometric properties. Methods: A convenience sampling technique was employed to recruit 200 oil workers (100 males and 100 females) in northern China. Originally, 158 participants (84 males and 74 females) completed the questionnaire; these accounted for 79% of the total study sample. From this group, a subsample of 50 participants (25 males and 25 females) was randomly selected to investigate the test–retest reliability. Of these, the responses of 33 participants (18 males and 15 females) were valid. The analysis on reliability was based on Cronbach’s α, Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r) and the intraclass correlation coefficient, also including evaluation on criterion validity and discriminatory validity. Results: The M-MSQ was found to be homogeneous in factor structure, comparing well with the original questionnaire. Both the discriminatory validity and the criterion-related validity were satisfactory in the total sample and gender groups, in addition, the overall reliability of the M-MSQ was sound in internal consistency with Cronbach’s α = 0.900–0.931. The results of the test–retest showed that the stability of the M-MSQ achieved a positive statistically significant standard assessed by Pearson’s coefficient and the intraclass correlation coefficient. Conclusion: The M-MSQ is reliable in these four subscales, and may be used as a measure of sexual esteem, sexual conscious, sexual motivation and sexual satisfaction in Mandarin speakers.

Additional keywords: China, psychometrics, sexuality studies.


References

[1]  McCabe MP, Cummins RA, Romeo Y. Relationship status, relationship quality, and health. J Fam Stud 1996; 2 109–20.
Relationship status, relationship quality, and health.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[2]  McCarthy BW, Bodnar EL. The equity model of sexuality: navigating and negotiating the similarities and differences between men and women in sexual behaviour, roles and values. Sex Relationship Ther 2005; 20 225–35.
The equity model of sexuality: navigating and negotiating the similarities and differences between men and women in sexual behaviour, roles and values.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[3]  World Health Organization (WHO). Report of a technical consultation on sexual health. Geneva: WHO; 2002. Available online at: http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/sexual_health/defining_sexual_health.pdf [verified August 2011].

[4]  Bouchard S, Godbout N, Sabourin S. Sexual attitudes and activities in women with borderline personality disorder involved in romantic relationships. J Sex Marital Ther 2009; 35 106–21.
Sexual attitudes and activities in women with borderline personality disorder involved in romantic relationships.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19266380PubMed |

[5]  Gatti C, Del Rossi C, Lombardi L, Caravaggi F, Casolari E, Casadio G. Sexuality and psychosocial functioning in young women after colovaginoplasty. J Urol 2010; 184 1799–803.
Sexuality and psychosocial functioning in young women after colovaginoplasty.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20728167PubMed |

[6]  Kaptein AA, van Klink RC, de Kok F, Scharloo M, Snoei L, Broadbent E, et al Sexuality in patients with asthma and COPD. Respir Med 2008; 102 198–204.
Sexuality in patients with asthma and COPD.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17996435PubMed |

[7]  Lachowsky M, Grivel T, Lemaire A, Elia D. Couple, sexuality and sexual health. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 2005; 33 326–30.
Couple, sexuality and sexual health.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2Mzgtlektw%3D%3D&md5=b5b8382560907cefcf64bc7b91f63566CAS | 15908256PubMed |

[8]  Launaz E. Sexuality, discussion and family planning. Arch Gynecol Obstet 1994; 255 S323–8.
Sexuality, discussion and family planning.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 7847923PubMed |

[9]  Slob AK, Koster J, Radder JK, van der Werff ten Bosch JJ. Sexuality and psychophysiological functioning in women with diabetes mellitus. J Sex Marital Ther 1990; 16 59–69.
Sexuality and psychophysiological functioning in women with diabetes mellitus.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK3czns1emug%3D%3D&md5=7fe86ed29a79b1a7d997f48fcbc8f7d1CAS | 2398502PubMed |

[10]  Snell WE, Fisher TD, Walters AS. The Multidimensional Sexuality Questionnaire: an objective self-report measure of psychological tendencies associated with human sexuality. Ann Sex Res 1993; 6 27–55.
The Multidimensional Sexuality Questionnaire: an objective self-report measure of psychological tendencies associated with human sexuality.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[11]  Anderson PB, Newton M. Predicting the use of sexual initiation tactics in a sample of college women. Electronic Journal of Human Sexuality 2004; 7 1–15. http://www.ejhs.org/volume7/Anderson/text.html, [Verified November 2011]

[12]  Ismail-Pratt IS, Bikoo M, Liao LM, Conway GS, Creighton SM. Normalization of the vagina by dilator treatment alone in complete androgen insensitivity syndrome and Mayer–Rokitansky–Kuster–Hauser syndrome. Hum Reprod 2007; 22 2020–4.
Normalization of the vagina by dilator treatment alone in complete androgen insensitivity syndrome and Mayer–Rokitansky–Kuster–Hauser syndrome.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17449508PubMed |

[13]  Jellis JB. Attachment style, working models of sexuality and their relation to safer sex behaviour in young adults. Ottawa: National Library of Canada ; 2001. Available online at: http://library2.usask.ca/theses/available/etd-10212004-002330/unrestricted/NQ63881.pdf [verified August 2011].

[14]  Liao L, Doyle J, Crouch NS, Creighton SM. Dilation as treatment for vaginal agenesis and hypoplasia: a pilot exploration of benefits and barriers as perceived by patients. J Obstet Gynaecol 2006; 26 144–8.
Dilation as treatment for vaginal agenesis and hypoplasia: a pilot exploration of benefits and barriers as perceived by patients.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16483974PubMed |

[15]  Suiming P. Sexual behavior and relationship in contemporary China. Beijing: Social Sciences Documentation Publishing House; 2003.

[16]  Suiming P, Rui Y. Sexuality of Chinese college students: a ten-year longitudinal study. Beijing: Social Sciences Documentation Publishing House; 2004.

[17]  Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistics notes: validating scales and indexes. BMJ 2002; 324 606–7.
Statistics notes: validating scales and indexes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 11884331PubMed |

[18]  Omotosho TB, Rogers RG. Shortcomings/strengths of specific sexual function questionnaires currently used in urogynecology: a literature review. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2009; 20 S51–6.
Shortcomings/strengths of specific sexual function questionnaires currently used in urogynecology: a literature review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19440783PubMed |

[19]  Behling O, Law KS. Translating questionnaires and other research instruments: problems and solutions. London: Sage Publications Inc; 2002.

[20]  Brody S. Body mass index but not pulse pressure is associated with lesser penile–vaginal Iitercourse frequency in healthy young men. J Sex Med 2010; 7 1853–7.
Body mass index but not pulse pressure is associated with lesser penile–vaginal Iitercourse frequency in healthy young men.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20233284PubMed |

[21]  Beretvas SN, Meyers JL, Leite W. A reliability generalization study of the Marlowe–Crowne Social desirability scale. Educ Psychol Meas 2002; 62 570–89.
A reliability generalization study of the Marlowe–Crowne Social desirability scale.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[22]  Neeleman AJ. The relevance of sexuality in the treatment of borderline personality disorder. Tijdschr Psychiatr 2007; 49 233–40.
| 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2s3is1Grtw%3D%3D&md5=7926d6adf0ea916361fcd77b3c3e9187CAS | 17436209PubMed |

[23]  Tao P, Guoying D, Brody S. Preliminary study of a Chinese language short form of the Marlowe–Crowne Social Desirability Scale. Psychol Rep 2009; 105 1039–46.
Preliminary study of a Chinese language short form of the Marlowe–Crowne Social Desirability Scale.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20229907PubMed |

[24]  Zulkosky K. Self-efficacy: a concept analysis. Nursing Forum 2009; 44 93–102.
Self-efficacy: a concept analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[25]  Luszczynska A, Scholz U, Schwarzer R. The general self-efficacy scale: multicultural validation studies. J Psychol 2005; 139 439–57.
The general self-efficacy scale: multicultural validation studies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16285214PubMed |

[26]  Caikang W, Zhongfeng H, Yong L. Evidences for reliability and validity of the Chinese version of general self-efficacy scale. Chinese Journal of Applied Psychology 2001; 7 37–40.

[27]  Hutcheson GD, Sofroniou N. The multivariate social science scientist: statistics using generalized linear models. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1999.

[28]  Klonoff-Cohen H, Natarajan L, Klonoff E. Validation of a new scale for measuring concerns of women undergoing assisted reproductive technologies (CART). J Health Psychol 2007; 12 352–6.
Validation of a new scale for measuring concerns of women undergoing assisted reproductive technologies (CART).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17284498PubMed |

[29]  Ismail K. Unravelling factor analysis. Evid Based Ment Health 2008; 11 99–102.
Unravelling factor analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18952952PubMed |

[30]  Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistics notes: Cronbach’s alpha. BMJ 1997; 314 572
Statistics notes: Cronbach’s alpha.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK2s3gvVOktA%3D%3D&md5=13c517f34f26b817dd2698d8127b0da7CAS | 9055718PubMed |

[31]  Yen M, Lo L.H. Examining test-retest reliability: an intra-class correlation approach. Nurs Res 2002; 51 59–62.
Examining test-retest reliability: an intra-class correlation approach.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 11822570PubMed |

[32]  Weir JP. Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. J Strength Cond Res 2005; 19 231–40.
| 15705040PubMed |

[33]  Wuyi Z, Bingyi H. Analysis on the reliability and validity of questionnaire. Statistics & Information Forum 2005; 20 11–5.

[34]  Edwards P, Roberts I, Clarke M, DiGuiseppi C, Pratap S, Wentz R, et al Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review. BMJ 2002; 324 1183–5.
Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 12016181PubMed |

[35]  van Agt HM, Essink-Bot ML, Krabbe PF, Bonsel GJ. Test–retest reliability of health state valuations collected with the EuroQol questionnaire. Soc Sci Med 1994; 39 1537–44.
Test–retest reliability of health state valuations collected with the EuroQol questionnaire.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK2M7hs12nug%3D%3D&md5=2344ec1c625e329e105c570cf5f160b9CAS | 7817218PubMed |