Register      Login
Sexual Health Sexual Health Society
Publishing on sexual health from the widest perspective
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Do family factors protect against sexual risk behaviour and teenage pregnancy among multiply disadvantaged young people? Findings from an English longitudinal study

Chris Bonell A , Meg Wiggins A , Adam Fletcher B D and Elizabeth Allen C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London, London WC1H 0NR, UK.

B School of Social Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales CF10 3WT, UK.

C Department of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK.

D Corresponding author. Email: FletcherA@cardiff.ac.uk

Sexual Health 11(3) 265-273 https://doi.org/10.1071/SH14005
Submitted: 14 January 2014  Accepted: 23 April 2014   Published: 3 July 2014

Abstract

Background: Structure and parenting within family of origin have been found to be determinants of sexual risk and teenage pregnancy in the general youth population. Few studies have examined determinants of sexual risk among disadvantaged young people; those that do have not examined teenage pregnancy outcomes. Methods: Longitudinal data from a cohort of multiply disadvantaged at-risk young people aged 13–15 years living in deprived neighbourhoods in England (n = 1285) were analysed to examine how family structure, communication with parents and parental interest in education were associated with heterosexual debut, contraception use, expectation of teenage pregnancy and teenage pregnancy. Results: At follow-up, young women living with both biological parents were less likely than other young women to become pregnant (odds ratio (OR) = 0.21, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.04–0.97). Young women who could talk to their mothers about private things were less likely to expect to become a teenage parent (OR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.37–0.99). Those whose parents cared very much how they did at school were less likely to report contraception nonuse (OR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.21–0.93). After adjustment, no associations between any family factors and sexual health outcomes were found for young men. Conclusions: We found limited evidence for family-related effects on sexual health risk or teenage pregnancy among disadvantaged young women in England and no evidence of risk factors within the home environment for young men’s outcomes. This suggests that targeted family-based interventions may not be appropriate for addressing these outcomes.

Additional keywords: adolescents, communication, family structure, home environment, parents, youth.


References

[1]  Hobcraft J, Kiernan K. Childhood poverty, early motherhood and adult exclusion. Br J Sociol 2001; 52 495–517.
Childhood poverty, early motherhood and adult exclusion.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MrjtFGlsQ%3D%3D&md5=f79046821cca5698716fb64921dee67cCAS | 11578006PubMed |

[2]  Kiernan K, Hobcraft JN. Parental divorce during childhood: age at first intercourse, partnership and parenthood. Popul Stud (Camb) 1997; 51 41–55.
Parental divorce during childhood: age at first intercourse, partnership and parenthood.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[3]  Manlove J. Early motherhood in an intergenerational perspective: the experiences of a British cohort. J Marriage Fam 1997; 59 263–79.
Early motherhood in an intergenerational perspective: the experiences of a British cohort.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[4]  Botting B, Rosato M, Wood R. Teenage mothers and the health of their children. Popul Trends 1998; 93 19–28.
| 9795977PubMed |

[5]  Whitbeck LB, Yoder KA, Hoyt DR, Conger RD. Early adolescent sexual activity: a developmental study. J Marriage Fam 1999; 61 934–46.
Early adolescent sexual activity: a developmental study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[6]  Wight D, Williamson L, Henderson M. Parental influences on young people’s sexual behaviour: a longitudinal analysis. J Adolesc 2006; 29 473–94.
Parental influences on young people’s sexual behaviour: a longitudinal analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16213580PubMed |

[7]  Godeau E, Vignes C, Duclos M, Navarro F, Cayla F, Grandjean H. Factors associated with early sexual initiation in young women: French data from the international survey health behaviour in school-aged children. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 2008; 36 176–82.
Factors associated with early sexual initiation in young women: French data from the international survey health behaviour in school-aged children.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1c3ivF2mtQ%3D%3D&md5=07b1d3744370bc7f463c24ce12a87bf5CAS | 18258474PubMed |

[8]  Ermisch J, Pevalin D. Who has a child as a teenager? Institute for Social and Economic Research (ISER) working paper. Colchester: University of Essex; 2003.

[9]  Bonell C, Allen E, Strange V, Oakley A, Copas A, Stephenson J, et al The influence of family type and parenting behaviours on teenage sexual behaviour and conceptions. J Epidemiol Community Health 2006; 60 502–6.
The influence of family type and parenting behaviours on teenage sexual behaviour and conceptions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD283mvFSntg%3D%3D&md5=82537600b962104f3287b0034fd0d9b1CAS | 16698980PubMed |

[10]  Davis EC, Friel LV. Adolescent sexuality: disentangling the effects of family structure and family context. J Marriage Fam 2001; 63 669–81.
Adolescent sexuality: disentangling the effects of family structure and family context.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[11]  Miller BC. Family influences on adolescent sexual and contraceptive behaviour. J Sex Res 2002; 39 22–6.
Family influences on adolescent sexual and contraceptive behaviour.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 12476252PubMed |

[12]  Pedersen W, Samuelsen SO, Wichstrøm L. Intercourse debut age: poor resources, problem behavior, or romantic appeal? A population based longitudinal study. J Sex Res 2003; 40 333–45.
Intercourse debut age: poor resources, problem behavior, or romantic appeal? A population based longitudinal study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 14735407PubMed |

[13]  Lenciauskiene I, Zaborskis A. The effects of family structure, parent–child relationship and parental monitoring on early sexual behaviour among adolescents in nine European countries. Scand J Public Health 2008; 36 607–18.
The effects of family structure, parent–child relationship and parental monitoring on early sexual behaviour among adolescents in nine European countries.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18775817PubMed |

[14]  Price MN, Hyde JS. When two isn’t better than one: predictors of early sexual activity in adolescence using a cumulative risk model. J Youth Adolesc 2009; 38 1059–71.
When two isn’t better than one: predictors of early sexual activity in adolescence using a cumulative risk model.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19636771PubMed |

[15]  Donahue KL, D’Onofrio BM, Bates JE, Lansford JE, Dodge KA, Pettit GS. Early exposure to parents’ relationship instability: implications for sexual behavior and depression in adolescence. J Adolesc Health 2010; 47 547–54.
Early exposure to parents’ relationship instability: implications for sexual behavior and depression in adolescence.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21094431PubMed |

[16]  Boislard Pepin MA, Poulin F. Individual, familial, friends-related and contextual predictors of early sexual intercourse. J Adolesc 2011; 34 289–300.
Individual, familial, friends-related and contextual predictors of early sexual intercourse.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[17]  Dancy BL, Crittenden KS, Ning H. African-American adolescent girls’ initiation of sexual activity: survival analysis. Womens Health Issues 2010; 20 146–55.
African-American adolescent girls’ initiation of sexual activity: survival analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20144551PubMed |

[18]  Roberts SR, Lewis RK, Carmack C. Positive youth development among African American adolescents: examining single parents as a factor. J Prev Intervent Community 2011; 39 310–9.
Positive youth development among African American adolescents: examining single parents as a factor.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[19]  Miller BC, Benson B, Galbraith KA. Family relationships and adolescent pregnancy risk: a research synthesis. Dev Rev 2001; 21 1–38.
Family relationships and adolescent pregnancy risk: a research synthesis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXjslemsLw%3D&md5=c3f4bddb0fdce4f114b818b7cd5888e3CAS |

[20]  Jaccard J, Dittus PJ. Adolescent perceptions of maternal approval of birth control and sexual risk behavior. Am J Public Health 2000; 90 1426–30.
Adolescent perceptions of maternal approval of birth control and sexual risk behavior.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvktFGjsg%3D%3D&md5=84e27dd0b39421d2ecbaffd212efc6edCAS | 10983201PubMed |

[21]  Bates JE, Alexander D, Oberlander S, Dodge KA, Pettit GS. Antecedents of sexual activity at ages 16 and 17 in a community sample followed from age 5. In Bancroft J, editor. Sexual development in childhood. Bloomington: Indiana University Press; 2003. pp. 206–37.

[22]  Hope TL, Chapple CL. Maternal characteristics, parenting, and adolescent sexual behavior: the role of self-control. Deviant Behav 2004; 26 25–45.
Maternal characteristics, parenting, and adolescent sexual behavior: the role of self-control.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[23]  Pearson J, Muller C, Frisco ML. Parental involvement, family structure, and adolescent sexual decision making. Sociol Perspect 2006; 49 67–90.
Parental involvement, family structure, and adolescent sexual decision making.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[24]  Johnson KA, Tyler KA. Adolescent sexual onset: an intergenerational analysis. J Youth Adolesc 2007; 36 939–49.
Adolescent sexual onset: an intergenerational analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[25]  Parkes A, Henderson M, Wight D, Nixon C. Is parenting associated with teenagers’ early sexual risk-taking, autonomy and relationship with sexual partners? Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2011; 43 30–40.
Is parenting associated with teenagers’ early sexual risk-taking, autonomy and relationship with sexual partners?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21388503PubMed |

[26]  McNeely CA, Nonnemaker JM, Blum RW. Promoting school connectedness: evidence from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health. J Sch Health 2002; 72 138–46.
Promoting school connectedness: evidence from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 12029810PubMed |

[27]  Rose A, Koo HP, Bhaskar B, Anderson K, White G, Jenkins RR. The influence of primary caregivers on the sexual behavior of early adolescents. J Adolesc Health 2005; 37 135–44.
The influence of primary caregivers on the sexual behavior of early adolescents.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16026723PubMed |

[28]  de Graaf H, Vanwesenbeeck I, Woertman L, Keijsers L, Meijer S, Meeus W. Parental support and knowledge and adolescents’ sexual health: testing two mediational models in a national Dutch sample. J Youth Adolesc 2010; 39 189–98.
Parental support and knowledge and adolescents’ sexual health: testing two mediational models in a national Dutch sample.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20084564PubMed |

[29]  Coley RL, Medeiros BL, Schindler HS. Using sibling differences to estimate effects of parenting on adolescent sexual risk behaviors. J Adolesc Health 2008; 43 133–40.
| 18639786PubMed |

[30]  Deptula DP, Henry DB, Schoeny ME. How can parents make a difference? Longitudinal associations with adolescent sexual behavior. J Fam Psychol 2010; 24 731–9.
How can parents make a difference? Longitudinal associations with adolescent sexual behavior.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21171771PubMed |

[31]  Elkington KS, Bauermeister JA, Zimmerman MA. Do parents and peers matter? A prospective socio-ecological examination of substance use and sexual risk among African American youth. J Adolesc 2011; 34 1035–47.
Do parents and peers matter? A prospective socio-ecological examination of substance use and sexual risk among African American youth.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21159374PubMed |

[32]  Madkour AS, Farhat T, Halpern CT, Godeau E, Gabhainn SN. Early adolescent sexual initiation as a problem behavior: a comparative study of five nations. J Adolesc Health 2010; 47 389–98.
Early adolescent sexual initiation as a problem behavior: a comparative study of five nations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20864009PubMed |

[33]  Diiorio C, Kelley M, Hockenberry-Eaton M. Communication about sexual issues: mothers, fathers, and friends. J Adolesc Health 1999; 24 181–9.
Communication about sexual issues: mothers, fathers, and friends.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK1M3htVWktA%3D%3D&md5=134d903838409db68280f7603986f64fCAS | 10195801PubMed |

[34]  Kiernan KE, Diamond I. The age at which childbearing starts: a longitudinal study. Population Studies 1983; 37 363–80.

[35]  Russell ST. Childhood developmental risk for teen childbearing in Britain. J Res Adolesc 2002; 12 305–24.
Childhood developmental risk for teen childbearing in Britain.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[36]  Frisco ML. Parental involvement and young women’s contraceptive use. J Marriage Fam 2005; 67 110–21.
Parental involvement and young women’s contraceptive use.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[37]  Dogan-Ates A, Carrion-Basham CY. Teenage pregnancy among Latinas: examining risk and protective factors. Hisp J Behav Sci 2007; 29 554–69.
Teenage pregnancy among Latinas: examining risk and protective factors.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[38]  Driscoll AK, Sugland BW, Manlove J, Papillo AR. Community opportunity, perceptions of opportunity, and the odds of an adolescent birth. Youth Soc 2005; 37 33–61.
Community opportunity, perceptions of opportunity, and the odds of an adolescent birth.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[39]  Gottfredson D, Kumpfer K, Polizzi-Fox D, Wilson D, Puryear V, Beatty P, et al The Strengthening Washington DC Families project: a randomized effectiveness trial of family-based prevention. Prev Sci 2006; 7 57–74.
The Strengthening Washington DC Families project: a randomized effectiveness trial of family-based prevention.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16555144PubMed |

[40]  Fletcher A, Gardner F, McKee M, Bonell C. The British government’s Troubled Families Programme: a flawed response to riots and youth offending. BMJ 2012; 344 e3403
The British government’s Troubled Families Programme: a flawed response to riots and youth offending.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22592850PubMed |

[41]  Department of Health (DoH). A framework for sexual health improvement in England . London: DoH; 2013.

[42]  Wiggins M, Bonell C, Sawtell M, Austerberry H, Burchett H, Allen E, et al Health outcomes of youth development programme in England: prospective matched comparison study. BMJ 2009; 339 b2534
Health outcomes of youth development programme in England: prospective matched comparison study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19584408PubMed |

[43]  Brooks F, Magnusson J, Klemera E, Spencer N, Morgan A. HBSC England report: findings from the 2010 HBSC Study. Hatfield: University of Hertfordshire; 2011.

[44]  Office for National Statistics (ONS). Conceptions in England and Wales 2011 . London: ONS; 2012.

[45]  NHS Information Centre. NHS contraceptive services England 2006–07 . London: NHS Information Centre; 2007.