A simple numerical model to estimate water availability in saline soilsMohammad Hossein Mohammadi A C and Mahnaz Khataar B
A Department of Soil Science, University of Tehran, 31587-77871 Karaj, Iran.
B Department of Soil Science, University of Zanjan, 38791-45371, Zanjan, Iran.
C Corresponding author. Email: firstname.lastname@example.org
Soil Research - https://doi.org/10.1071/SR17081
Submitted: 15 March 2017 Accepted: 4 October 2017 Published online: 7 December 2017
We developed a numerical model to predict soil salinity from knowledge of evapotranspiration rate, crop salt tolerance, irrigation water salinity, and soil hydraulic properties. Using the model, we introduced a new weighting function to express the limitation imposed by salinity on plant available water estimated by the integral water capacity concept. Lower and critical limits of soil water uptake by plants were also defined. We further analysed the sensitivity of model results to underlying parameters using characteristics given for corn, cowpea, and barley in the literature and two clay and sandy loam soils obtained from databases. Results showed that, between two irrigation events, soil salinity increased nonlinearly with decreasing soil water content especially when evapotranspiration and soil drainage rate were high. The salinity weighting function depended greatly on the plant sensitivity to salinity and irrigation water salinity. This research confirmed that both critical and lower limits (in terms of water content) of soil water uptake by plants increased with evapotranspiration rate and irrigation water salinity. Since the presented approach is based on a physical concept and well-known plant parameters, soil hydraulic characteristics, irrigation water salinity, and meteorological conditions, it may be useful in spatio-temporal modelling of soil water quality and quantity and prediction of crop yield.
Additional keywords: integral water capacity, plant water uptake, salinity stress, soil hydraulic properties.
ReferencesAlbasha R, Mailhol JC, Cheviron B (2015) Compensatory uptake functions in empirical macroscopic root water uptake models–experimental and numerical analysis. Agricultural Water Management 155, 22–39.
| Compensatory uptake functions in empirical macroscopic root water uptake models–experimental and numerical analysis.CrossRef |
Assouline S, Or D (2014) The concept of field capacity revisited: defining intrinsic static and dynamic criteria for soil internal drainage dynamics. Water Resources Research 50, 4787–4802.
| The concept of field capacity revisited: defining intrinsic static and dynamic criteria for soil internal drainage dynamics.CrossRef |
da Silva AP, Kay BD, Perfect E (1994) Characterization of the least limiting water range. Soil Science Society of America Journal 58, 1775–1781.
| Characterization of the least limiting water range.CrossRef | 1:CAS:528:DyaK2MXitlCjsLw%3D&md5=07f8aa7b34d524ac114ad775696bb7baCAS |
de Jong van Lier Q, Van Dam JC, Metselaar K, De Jong R, Duijnisveld WHM (2008) Macroscopic root water uptake distribution using a matrix flux potential approach. Vadose Zone Journal 7, 1065–1078.
| Macroscopic root water uptake distribution using a matrix flux potential approach.CrossRef |
Doussan C, Pages L, Vercambre G (1998) Modelling the hydraulic architecture of root systems: an integrated approach to water absorption—model description. Annals of Botany 81, 213–223.
| Modelling the hydraulic architecture of root systems: an integrated approach to water absorption—model description.CrossRef |
Feddes RA, Raats PAC (2004) Parameterizing the soil-water-plant root system. In ‘Unsaturated zone modeling: progress, challenges, and applications’. (Eds RA Feddes, PAC Raats) pp. 95–141. (Springer: New York)
Gardner WR (1960) Dynamic aspects of water availability to plants. Soil Science 89, 63–73.
| Dynamic aspects of water availability to plants.CrossRef |
Gilbert ME, Medina V (2016) Drought adaptation mechanisms should guide experimental design. Trends in Plant Science 21, 639–647.
| Drought adaptation mechanisms should guide experimental design.CrossRef | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC28Xlsleqsbo%3D&md5=a4ce53b2d95d90302dc3a0f534bacb8fCAS |
Green SR, Kirkham MB, Clothier E (2006) Root uptake and transpiration: From measurements and models to sustainable irrigation. Agricultural Water Management 86, 165–176.
| Root uptake and transpiration: From measurements and models to sustainable irrigation.CrossRef |
Groenevelt PH, Grant CD, Semetsa S (2001) A new procedure to determine soil water availability. Australian Journal of Soil Research 39, 577–598.
| A new procedure to determine soil water availability.CrossRef |
Groenevelt PH, Grant CD, Murray RS (2004) On water availability in saline soils. Australian Journal of Soil Research 42, 833–840.
| On water availability in saline soils.CrossRef |
Javaux M, Couvreur V, Vanderborght J, Vereecken H (2013) Root water uptake: from three-dimensional biophysical processes to macroscopic modeling approaches. Vadose Zone Journal 12, 1–16.
| Root water uptake: from three-dimensional biophysical processes to macroscopic modeling approaches.CrossRef |
Kirkham MB (2004) ‘Principles of soil and plant water relations.’ (Elsevier: Academic Press, London)
Letey J (1985) Relationship between soil physical properties and crop production. Advances in Soil Science 1, 277–294.
| Relationship between soil physical properties and crop production.CrossRef |
Maas EV, Hoffman GJ (1977) Crop salt tolerance current assessment. Journal of the Irrigation and Drainage Division 103, 115–134.
Molz FJ (1981) Models of water transport in the soil–plant system: a review. Water Resources Research 17, 1245–1260.
| Models of water transport in the soil–plant system: a review.CrossRef |
Nemes A, Schaap MG, Leij FJ (2000) The UNSODA unsaturated soil hydraulic property database, version 2.0. Available at http://www.ars.usda.gov/Services/docs.htm
Personne E, Perrier A, Tuzet A (2003) Simulating water uptake in the root zone with a microscopic-scale model of root extraction. Agronomy Journal 23, 153–168.
| Simulating water uptake in the root zone with a microscopic-scale model of root extraction.CrossRef |
Porporato A, Dodorico P, Laio F, Ridolfi L, Rodriguez-Iturbe I (2002) Ecohydrology of water-controlled ecosystems. Advances in Water Resources 25, 1335–1348.
| Ecohydrology of water-controlled ecosystems.CrossRef |
Raats PAC (2007) Uptake of water from soils by plant roots. Transport in Porous Media 68, 5–28.
| Uptake of water from soils by plant roots.CrossRef | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXntlWlsL0%3D&md5=1d1c8065b90f347f555283905366be26CAS |
Rawlings JO, Cure WW (1985) The Weibull function as a dose–response model to describe ozone effects on crop yields. Crop Science 25, 807–814.
Rhoades JD, Kandiah A, Mashali AM (1992) ‘The use of saline waters for crop production. Vol. 48.’ (FAO: Rome)
Richards LA (1931) Capillary conduction of liquids in porous mediums. Physics 1, 318–333.
| Capillary conduction of liquids in porous mediums.CrossRef |
Skaggs TH, van Genuchten MTh, Shouse PJ, Poss JA (2006) Macroscopic approaches to root water uptake as a function of water and salinity stress. Agricultural Water Management 86, 140–179.
Steinhardt R, Ehlers W, van der Poeg RR (1981) Analysis of soil-water uptake from a drying loess soil by an oat crop using a simulation model. Irrigation Science 2, 237–258.
Steppuhn H, Van Genuchten MTh, Grieve CM (2005) Root-zone salinity. Crop Science 45, 209–220.
| Root-zone salinity.CrossRef |
Stewart BA, Peterson GA (2015) Managing green water in dry land agriculture. Agronomy Journal 107, 1544–1553.
| Managing green water in dry land agriculture.CrossRef |
Tanji KK, Kielen NC (2002) ‘Agricultural drainage water management in arid and semi-arid areas.’ (FAO: Rome)
van Genuchten MTh (1980) A closed form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal 44, 892–898.
| A closed form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils.CrossRef |
van Genuchten MTh (1983) Analyzing crop salt tolerance data: model description and user’s manual. UDSA, ARS, U.S. Salinity Lab. Report No. 120. U.S. Gov. Printing Office, Washington, DC.
van Genuchten MTh (1987) ‘A numerical model for water and solute movement and below the root zone.’ (US Salinity Laboratory: Washington)
van Genuchten MTh, Leij FJ, Yates SR (1991) ‘The RETC code for quantifying the hydraulic functions of unsaturated soils.’ (Citeseer: New Jersey)
Vereecken H, Schnepf A, Hopmans JW, Javaux M, Or D, Roose T, Vanderborght J, Young MH, Amelung W, Aitkenhead M, Allisson SD, Assouline S, Baveye P, Berli M, Bruggemann N, Finke P, Flury M, Geiser T, Govers G, Ghezzehei T, Hallett P, Hendricks Franssen HJ, Heppel J, Horn R, Huisman JA, Jacques D, Jonard F, Kollet S, Lafolie F, Lamorsky K, Leitner D, McBratney A, Minasny B, Montzka C, Nowak W, Pachepsky Y, Padarian J, Romano N, Roth K, Rothfuss Y, Rowe EC, Schwen A, Simunek J, Titak A, Van Dam J, Van der Zee SEATM, Vogel HJ, Vrugt JA, Wohling T, Young IM (2016) Modeling Soil Processes: Review, Key Challenges, and New Perspectives. Vadose Zone Journal 15, 1–57.
| Modeling Soil Processes: Review, Key Challenges, and New Perspectives.CrossRef | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2sXhs1agtbbE&md5=964f78b084f86e9bee453a0ef8abe46aCAS |
Vrugt JA, Hopmans JW, Simunek J (2001) Calibration of a two-dimensional root water uptake model. Soil Science Society of America Journal 65, 1027–1037.
| Calibration of a two-dimensional root water uptake model.CrossRef | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXntFeqtLw%3D&md5=6693542e1766aecd573b7ebbb506f07cCAS |
Youngs EG (1960) The drainage of liquids from porous materials Journal of Geophysical Research 65, 4025–4030.
| The drainage of liquids from porous materialsCrossRef |