Register      Login
International Journal of Wildland Fire International Journal of Wildland Fire Society
Journal of the International Association of Wildland Fire
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Does firefighting foam affect the growth of some Australian native plants?

Kerry Hartskeerl A B , Dianne Simmons B and Robyn Adams B C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Land Protection Officer, Mornington Peninsula Shire, Private Bag 1000, Rosebud, Victoria 3939, Australia.

B School of Ecology and Environment, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, Victoria 3125, Australia.

C Corresponding author. Telephone: +61 3 9251 7606; fax: +61 3 9251 7626; email: radams@deakin.edu.au

International Journal of Wildland Fire 13(3) 335-341 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF03065
Submitted: 10 September 2003  Accepted: 23 June 2004   Published: 16 November 2004

Abstract

Firefighting foams (Class A foams) are an effective and widespread firefighting tool, and are frequently used in environmentally sensitive areas. They are known to be ecologically damaging in aquatic environments; however, their impacts at the plant species or ecosystem level are relatively unknown. Reports of shoot damage to plants, suppressed flowering and changes in plant community composition suggest that the environmental damage caused by their use may be unacceptable. Applications of four levels of foam to seedlings of seven Australian plant species, from five representative and widespread families, showed no detectable impacts on a range of vegetative growth characteristics. The results are encouraging for continued use of firefighting foam in sensitive natural habitats.

Additional keywords: Australian plant species; class A foam; ecological impact; wildfire suppression.


References


Adams R (2000) ‘Ecological effects of Class A foams and their potential ecological impacts on Australian ecosystems.’ Report to Country Fire Authority, Victoria, Australia. (School of Ecology and Environment, Deakin University: Burwood, Victoria, Australia)

Adams R , Simmons D (1999) Ecological effects of fire fighting foams and retardants: a summary. Australian Forestry  62, 307–314.
Norecol (1989) ‘Toxicological review of fire fighting foams.’ Report prepared for Fire Management Forest Protection Branch, Ministry of Forests and Lands, Victoria, British Columbia. (Norecol Environmental Consultants Ltd.: Vancouver, BC)

Norris LA , Webb WL (1989) ‘Effects of fire retardant on water quality.’ USDA Forest Service, General Technical Report PSW-109. pp. 79–86.

Poulton BC , Finger SE (1996) Effects of fire suppressant foams on a prairie wetland ecosystem—a study of a North Dakota prairie wetland community. In ‘Proceedings of the international wildland fire foam symposium and workshop’. (Ed. GS Ramsay) pp. 145–151. Petawawa National Forestry Institute, Information Report PI-X-123. Natural Resources Canada.

Specht RL (1994) Heathlands. In ‘Australian vegetation’. (Ed.  RH Groves )  pp. 321–344. (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK)

Truman R , Lambert MJ (1978) Salinity damage to Norfolk Island Pines caused by surfactants. I. The nature of the problem and effect of potassium, sodium and chloride concentration on uptake by roots. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology  5, 377–385.


Vyas NB, Spann JW , Hill EF (1996) Effects of Silv-Ex on terrestrial wildlife. Proceedings of the North Dakota Academy of Science  50, 150–151.