Register      Login
International Journal of Wildland Fire International Journal of Wildland Fire Society
Journal of the International Association of Wildland Fire
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Spatio-temporal analysis of wildfire ignitions in the St Johns River Water Management District, Florida

Marc G. Genton A D , David T. Butry B , Marcia L. Gumpertz C and Jeffrey P. Prestemon B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Statistics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-3143, USA.

B USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station, RTP, NC 27709-2254, USA.

C Department of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-8203, USA.

D Corresponding author. Email: genton@stat.tamu.edu

International Journal of Wildland Fire 15(1) 87-97 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF04034
Submitted: 1 August 2004  Accepted: 30 November 2005   Published: 6 March 2006

Abstract

We analyse the spatio-temporal structure of wildfire ignitions in the St Johns River Water Management District in north-eastern Florida. We show, using tools to analyse point patterns (e.g. the L-function), that wildfire events occur in clusters. Clustering of these events correlates with irregular distribution of fire ignitions, including lightning and human sources, and fuels on the landscape. In addition, we define a relative clustering index that summarizes the amount of clustering over various spatial scales. We carry our analysis in three steps: purely temporal, purely spatial, and spatio-temporal. Our results show that arson and lightning are the leading causes of wildfires in this region and that ignitions by railroad, lightning, and arson are spatially more clustered than ignitions by other accidental causes.

Additional keywords: clustering; confidence envelope; fire occurrence; L-function; point process.


References


Baddeley A , Turner R (2005) Spatstat: an R package for analyzing spatial point patterns. Journal of Statistical Software  12, 1–42.
Butry DT, Prestemon JP (2005). ‘Spatio-temporal wildland arson crime functions.’ Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Agricultural Economics Association, 26–29 July 2005, Providence, Rhode Island. Available at http://agecon.lib.umn.edu/cgi-bin/pdf_view.pl?paperid=16442&ftype=.pdf [Verified 5 January 2006]

Butry DT, Mercer DE, Prestemon JP, Pye JM , Holmes TP (2001) What is the price of catastrophic wildfire? Journal of Forestry  11, 9–17.
Butry DT, Gumpertz ML, Genton MG (2004). ‘Why catastrophic wildfires?’ Technical report. (Department of Statistics, North Carolina State Universtiy: Raleigh, NC)

Dissing D , Verbyla DL (2003) Spatial patterns of lightning strikes in interior Alaska and their relations to elevation and vegetation. Canadian Journal of Forest Research  33, 770–782.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Fuquay DM (1980). Lightning that ignites forest fires. In ‘Proceedings of the 6th conference on fire and forest meteorology, Seattle, WA’. pp. 109–112. (Society of American Foresters: Bethesda, MD)

Fuquay DM (1982) Positive cloud-to-ground lightning in summer thunderstorms. Journal of Geophysical Research  87, 7131–7140.
R Development Core Team (2004). ‘R: A language and environment for statistical computing.’ R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available at http://www.R-project.org [Verified 5 January 2006]

Reinhardt ED, Keane RE , Brown JK (2001) Modeling fire effects. International Journal of Wildland Fire  10, 373–380.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ripley BD (1976) The second-order analysis of stationary point processes. Journal of Applied Probability  13, 255–266.


Rorig ML , Ferguson SA (1999) Characteristics of lightning and wildland fire ignition in the Pacific Northwest. Journal of Applied Meteorology  38, 1565–1575.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Surette R (2002) Self-reported copycat crime among a population of serious and violent juvenile offenders. Crime and Delinquency  48, 46–69.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Townsley M, Homel R , Chaseling J (2003) Infectious burglaries: a test of the near repeat hypothesis. The British Journal of Criminology  43, 615–633.