International Journal of Wildland Fire International Journal of Wildland Fire Society
Journal of the International Association of Wildland Fire
RESEARCH ARTICLE

A simulation and optimisation procedure to model daily suppression resource transfers during a fire season in Colorado

Yu Wei A C , Erin J. Belval A , Matthew P. Thompson B , Dave E. Calkin B and Crystal S. Stonesifer B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Forest and Rangeland Stewardship, Warner College of Natural Resources, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80526, USA.

B USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, 800 East Beckwith Avenue, Missoula, MT 59801, USA.

C Corresponding author. Email: yu.wei@colostate.edu

International Journal of Wildland Fire - https://doi.org/10.1071/WF16073
Submitted: 30 April 2014  Accepted: 13 September 2016   Published online: 2 November 2016

Abstract

Sharing fire engines and crews between fire suppression dispatch zones may help improve the utilisation of fire suppression resources. Using the Resource Ordering and Status System, the Predictive Services’ Fire Potential Outlooks and the Rocky Mountain Region Preparedness Levels from 2010 to 2013, we tested a simulation and optimisation procedure to transfer crews and engines between dispatch zones in Colorado (central United States) and into Colorado from out-of-state. We used this model to examine how resource transfers may be influenced by assignment shift length, resource demand prediction accuracy, resource drawdown restrictions and the compounding effects of resource shortages. Test results show that, in certain years, shortening the crew shift length from 14 days to 4 days doubles the yearly transport cost. Results also show that improving the accuracy in predicting daily resource demands decreases the engine and crew transport costs by up to 40%. Other test results show that relaxing resource drawdown restrictions could decrease resource transport costs and the reliance on out-of-state resources. The model-suggested assignments result in lower transport costs than did historical assignments.

Additional keywords: fire management, modelling, planning.


References

Alexandridis A, Russo L, Vakalis D, Bafas GV, Siettos CI (2011) Wildland fire spread modelling using cellular automata: evolution in large-scale spatially heterogeneous environments under fire suppression tactics. International Journal of Wildland Fire 20, 633–647.
Wildland fire spread modelling using cellular automata: evolution in large-scale spatially heterogeneous environments under fire suppression tactics.CrossRef | open url image1

Arapaho-Roosevelt National Forest and Pawnee National Grassland (2015) Fire resource briefing packet. Available at http://gacc.nifc.gov/rmcc/dispatch_centers/r2ftc/documents/Briefing_Packet.pdf [Verified 26 March 2016]

Belval EJ, Wei Y, Bevers M (2015) A mixed integer program to model spatial wildfire behavior and suppression placement decisions. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 45, 384–393.
A mixed integer program to model spatial wildfire behavior and suppression placement decisions.CrossRef | open url image1

Calkin DE, Gebert KM, Jones JG, Neilson RP (2005) Forest Service large fire area burned and suppression expenditure trends 1970 –2002. Journal of Forestry 4, 179–183.

Calkin DE, Cohen JD, Finney MA, Thompson MP (2014) How risk management can prevent future wildfire disasters in the wildland–urban interface. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 111, 746–751.
How risk management can prevent future wildfire disasters in the wildland–urban interface.CrossRef | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2cXotFCgug%3D%3D&md5=2a68b94f3d5164d28009b9639978ad07CAS | open url image1

Chow JYJ, Regan AC (2011) Resource location and relocation models with rolling horizon forecasting for wildland fire planning. INFOR 49, 31–43.
Resource location and relocation models with rolling horizon forecasting for wildland fire planning.CrossRef | open url image1

Gallego Arrubla JA, Ntaimo L, Stripling C (2014) Wildfire initial response planning using probabilistically constrained stochastic integer programming. International Journal of Wildland Fire 23, 825–838.
Wildfire initial response planning using probabilistically constrained stochastic integer programming.CrossRef | open url image1

Haas JR, Calkin DE, Thompson MP (2015) Wildfire risk transmission in the Colorado Front Range, USA. Risk Analysis 35, 226–240.
Wildfire risk transmission in the Colorado Front Range, USA.CrossRef | open url image1

Haight RG, Fried JS (2007) Deploying wildland fire suppression resources with a scenario-based standard response model. INFOR 45, 31–39.
Deploying wildland fire suppression resources with a scenario-based standard response model.CrossRef | open url image1

Hand MS, Thompson MP, Calkin DE (2016) Examining heterogeneity and wildfire management expenditures using spatially and temporally descriptive data. Journal of Forest Economics 22, 80–102.
Examining heterogeneity and wildfire management expenditures using spatially and temporally descriptive data.CrossRef | open url image1

Headwater Economics (2013) The rising cost of wildfire protection. Available at http://headwaterseconomics.org/wildfire/homes-risk/fire-cost-background/ [Verified 13 July 2016]

Lee Y, Fried JS, Albers HJ, Haight RG (2013) Deploying initial attack resources for wildfire suppression: spatial coordination, budget constraints, and capacity constraints. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 43, 56–65.
Deploying initial attack resources for wildfire suppression: spatial coordination, budget constraints, and capacity constraints.CrossRef | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXjtFWgtrs%3D&md5=79e322cff6bd107c9c9f04266ea0b519CAS | open url image1

Liu ZH, Wimberly MC (2015) Climatic and landscape influences on fire regimes from 1984 to 2010 in the western United States. PLoS One 10, e0140839
Climatic and landscape influences on fire regimes from 1984 to 2010 in the western United States.CrossRef | open url image1

Maguire LA, Albright EA (2005) Can behavioral decision theory explain risk-averse fire management decisions? Forest Ecology and Management 211, 47–58.
Can behavioral decision theory explain risk-averse fire management decisions?CrossRef | open url image1

Martell DL (2015) A review of recent forest and wildland fire management decision support systems research. Current Forestry Report 1, 128–137.
A review of recent forest and wildland fire management decision support systems research.CrossRef | open url image1

Martell DL, Gunn EA, Weintraub A (1998) Forest management challenges for operational researchers. European Journal of Operational Research 104, 1–17.
Forest management challenges for operational researchers.CrossRef | open url image1

Minas J, Hearne J, Martell D (2015) An integrated optimization model for fuel management and fire suppression preparedness planning. Annals of Operations Research 232, 201–215.

Montrose Interagency Dispatch Center (2015) Montrose Interagency Dispatch Center mob guide. Available at http://gacc.nifc.gov/rmcc/dispatch_centers/r2mtc/Mobilizaton_Guide/MTC%20Mob%20Guide.pdf [Verified 26 March 2016]

National Interagency Fire Center (NIFC) (2016) National Interagency Mobilization Guide. Available at http://www.nifc.gov/nicc/mobguide/Chapter%2010.pdf [Verified 12 July 2016]

National Multi-Agency Coordination Group (NMAC) (2008) Support guide. Available at http://www.nifc.gov/nicc/administrative/nmac/index.html [Verified 25 March 2016]

National Multi-agency Coordination Group (NMAC) (2015) National Preparedness Levels. Available at https://www.nifc.gov/fireInfo/fireinfo_prepLevels.html [Verified 12 July 2016]

Ntaimo L, Seigler BP, Vasconcelos MJ, Khargharia B (2004) Forest fire spread and suppression in DEVS. Simulation 80, 479–500.
Forest fire spread and suppression in DEVS.CrossRef | open url image1

Ntaimo L, Arrubla JAG, Stripling C, Young J, Spencer T (2012) A stochastic programming standard response model for wildfire initial attack planning. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 42, 987–1001.
A stochastic programming standard response model for wildfire initial attack planning.CrossRef | open url image1

Ntaimo L, Arrubla JAG, Gang J, Stripling C, Young J, Spencer T (2013) A simulation and stochastic integer programming approach to wildfire initial attack planning. Forest Science 59, 105–117.
A simulation and stochastic integer programming approach to wildfire initial attack planning.CrossRef | open url image1

Owen G, Mcleod JD, Kolden CA, Ferguson DB, Brown TJ (2012) Wildfire management and forecasting fire potential: the roles of climate information and social networks in the southwest United States. Weather, Climate, and Society 4, 90–102.
Wildfire management and forecasting fire potential: the roles of climate information and social networks in the southwest United States.CrossRef | open url image1

Petrovic N, Alderson DL, Carlson JM (2012) Dynamic resource allocation in disaster response: tradeoffs in wildfire suppression. PLoS One 7, e33285
Dynamic resource allocation in disaster response: tradeoffs in wildfire suppression.CrossRef | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38Xmtlamsr4%3D&md5=3436868e7d0067e539354147fb037bb4CAS | open url image1

Predictive Services (2016) Predictive Services Program Overview. Available at http://www.predictiveservices.nifc.gov/predictive.htm [Verified 12 July 2016]

Preisler HK, Westerling AL, Gebert KM, Munoz-Arriola F, Holmes TP (2011) Spatially explicit forecasts of large wildland fire probability and suppression costs for California. International Journal of Wildland Fire 20, 508–517.
Spatially explicit forecasts of large wildland fire probability and suppression costs for California.CrossRef | open url image1

Pueblo Interagency Dispatch Center (2015) Pueblo Interagency Dispatch Center mob guide. Available at http://gacc.nifc.gov/rmcc/dispatch_centers/r2pbc/2015%20PIDC%20MobGuide.pdf [Verified 25 March 2016]

Riley K, Stonesifer C, Calkin D, Preisler H (2015) Assessing Predictive Services’ 7-day potential fire forecast. In ‘Proceedings of the large wildland fires conference’, 19–23 May 2014, Missoula, MT. (Eds RE Keane, M Jolly, R Parsons, K Riley) USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, RMRS-P-73, pp. 187–194 (Fort Collins, CO).

Short KC (2015) Spatial wildfire occurrence data for the United States, 1992–2013 [FPA_FOD_20150323]. 3rd edn. Fort Collins, CO: Forest Service Research Data Archive. Available at http://www.fs.usda.gov/rds/archive/Product/RDS-2013-0009.3/

State of Colorado (2015) House Joint Resolution: Concerning Requests to the Federal Government Regarding Support for Wildland Fire Suppression. LLS No. R15–0129.01, Ashley, Zimmerman x2291. Available at https://www.colorado.gov/pacific/sites/default/files/Wildfire%20RESOLUTION%20A%2015-0129.pdf [Verified 25 March 2016]

Thompson MP, Scott J, Langowski PG, Gilbertson-Day JW, Haas JR, Bowne EM (2013) Assessing watershed–wildfire risks on National Forest System lands in the Rocky Mountain Region of the United States. Water (Basel) 5, 945–971.
Assessing watershed–wildfire risks on National Forest System lands in the Rocky Mountain Region of the United States.CrossRef | open url image1

USDA Forest Service (2015) The rising cost of wildfire operations: effects on the Forest Service’s non fire work. Available at http://www.fs.fed.us/sites/default/files/2015-Fire-Budget-Report.pdf [Verified 25 March 2016]

USDOI and USDA (2015a) Fiscal year 2015 budget overview. Available at http://www.fs.fed.us/aboutus/budget/2015/FY15-FS-Budget-Overview.pdf [Verified 20 July 2016]

USDOI and USDA (2015b) Interagency standards for fire and fire aviation operations. Available at https://www.nifc.gov/PUBLICATIONS/redbook/2015/RedBookAll.pdf [Verified 20 July 2016]

van der Merwe M, Minas JP, Ozlen M, Hearne JW (2015) A mixed integer programming approach for asset protection during escaped wildfires. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 45, 444–451.
A mixed integer programming approach for asset protection during escaped wildfires.CrossRef | open url image1

Wei Y, Rideout DB, Halls T (2011) Toward efficient management of large fires: a mixed integer programming model and two iterative approaches. Forest Science 13, 435–447.

Wei Y, Bevers M, Belval EJ, Bird B (2015) A chance-constrained programming model to allocate wildfire initial attack resources for a fire season. Forest Science 61, 278–288.
A chance-constrained programming model to allocate wildfire initial attack resources for a fire season.CrossRef | open url image1



Supplementary MaterialSupplementary Material (517 KB) Export Citation