Register      Login
International Journal of Wildland Fire International Journal of Wildland Fire Society
Journal of the International Association of Wildland Fire
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Minority households’ willingness to pay for public and private wildfire risk reduction in Florida

Armando González-Cabán A B and José J. Sánchez A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, 4955 Canyon Crest Drive, Riverside, CA 92507, USA.

B Corresponding author. Email: agonzalezcaban@fs.fed.us

International Journal of Wildland Fire 26(8) 744-753 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF16216
Submitted: 13 July 2016  Accepted: 31 May 2017   Published: 8 August 2017

Abstract

The purpose of this work is to estimate willingness to pay (WTP) for minority (African-American and Hispanic) homeowners in Florida for private and public wildfire risk-reduction programs and also to test for differences in response between the two groups. A random parameter logit and latent class model allowed us to determine if there is a difference in wildfire mitigation program preferences, whether WTP is higher for public or private actions for wildfire risk reduction, and whether households with personal experience and who perceive that they live in higher-risk areas have significantly higher WTP. We also compare Florida minority homeowners’ WTP values with Florida original homeowners’ estimates. Results suggest that Florida minority homeowners are willing to invest in public programs, with African-Americans WTP values at a higher rate than Hispanics. In addition, the highest priority for cost-sharing funds would go to low-income homeowners, especially to cost-share private actions on their own land. These results may help fire managers optimise allocation of scarce cost-sharing funds for public v. private actions.

Additional keywords: choice experiment, Firewise, latent class model, random parameter logit model, WUI.


References

Adamowicz W, Louviere J, Swait J (1998) Introduction to attribute-based stated choice methods. Resource Valuation Branch Damage Assessment Center, NOAA, US Department of Commerce, Washington, DC, USA.

Bowker JM, Lim SH, Cordell HK, Green GT, Rideout-Hanzak S, Johnson CY (2008) Wildland fire, risk, and recovery: results of a national survey with regional and racial perspectives. Journal of Forestry 106, 268–276.

Boxall PC, Adamowicz WL (2002) Understanding heterogeneous preferences in random utility models: a latent class approach. Environmental and Resource Economics 23, 421–446.
Understanding heterogeneous preferences in random utility models: a latent class approach.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Boxall PC, Adamowicz WL, Swait J, Williams M, Louviere J (1996) A comparison of stated preference methods for environmental valuation. Journal of Ecological Economics. 18, 243–253.
A comparison of stated preference methods for environmental valuation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bureau of Labor Statistics (2016) CPI inflation calculator. Available at http://data.bls.gov/cgi-bin/cpicalc.pl [Verified June 2016]

Champ PA, Boyle K, Brown TC (2003) ‘A Primer on Non-market Valuation.’ (Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, Netherlands)

Cortner HJ, Gardner PD, Taylor JD (1990) Fire hazards at the urban–wildland interface: what the public expects. Environmental Management 14, 57–62.
Fire hazards at the urban–wildland interface: what the public expects.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Fried JS, Winter GJ, Gilless JK (1999) Assessing the benefits of reducing fire risk in the wildland–urban interface: a contingent valuation approach. International Journal of Wildland Fire 9, 9–20.
Assessing the benefits of reducing fire risk in the wildland–urban interface: a contingent valuation approach.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gaither CJ, Poudyal NC, Goodrick S, Bowker JM, Malone S, Gan J (2011) Wildland fire risk and social vulnerability in the south-eastern United States: an exploratory spatial data analysis approach. Forest Policy and Economics 13, 24–36.
Wildland fire risk and social vulnerability in the south-eastern United States: an exploratory spatial data analysis approach.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gardner PD, Cortner HJ, Widaman K (1987) The risk perceptions and policy response toward wildland fire hazards by urban home-owners. Landscape and Urban Planning 14, 163–172.
The risk perceptions and policy response toward wildland fire hazards by urban home-owners.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Holmes T, González-Cabán A, Loomis J, Sánchez JJ (2013) The role of personal experience on choice-based preferences for wildfire protection programs. International Journal of Wildland Fire 22, 234–245.
The role of personal experience on choice-based preferences for wildfire protection programs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kaval P, Loomis J, Seidl A (2007) Willingness-to-pay for prescribed fire in the Colorado (USA) wildland–urban interface. Forest Policy and Economics 9, 928–937.
Willingness-to-pay for prescribed fire in the Colorado (USA) wildland–urban interface.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Krupnick A, Alberini A, Cropper M, Simon N, O’Brien B, Goeree R, Heintzelman M (2002) Age, health and the willingness to pay for mortality risk reductions: a contingent valuation survey of Ontario residents. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 24, 161–186.
Age, health and the willingness to pay for mortality risk reductions: a contingent valuation survey of Ontario residents.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Loomis J, duVair P (1993) Evaluating the effect of alternative risk communication devices on willingness to pay: results from a dichotomous choice contingent valuation experiment. Land Economics 69, 287–298.
Evaluating the effect of alternative risk communication devices on willingness to pay: results from a dichotomous choice contingent valuation experiment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Loomis J, González-Cabán A (2010) Forest Service use of non-market valuation in fire economics: past, present, and future. Journal of Forestry 108, 389–396.

Loomis JB, Hung LT, González-Cabán A (2009) Willingness to pay function for two fuel treatments to reduce wildfire acreage burned: a scope test and comparison of White and Hispanic households. Forest Policy and Economics 11, 155–160.
Willingness to pay function for two fuel treatments to reduce wildfire acreage burned: a scope test and comparison of White and Hispanic households.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Meldrum JR, Champ PA, Warziniack T, Brenkert-Smith H, Barth CM, Falk LC (2014) Cost-shared wildfire risk mitigation in Log Hill Mesa, Colorado: survey evidence on participation and willingness to pay. International Journal of Wildland Fire 23, 567–576.
Cost-shared wildfire risk mitigation in Log Hill Mesa, Colorado: survey evidence on participation and willingness to pay.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

National Interagency Fire Center Wildland Fire Statistics (2014) Available at: http://www.nifc.gov/fireInfo/fireInfo_statistics.html [Verified June 2016]

Radeloff VC, Hammer RB, Stewart SI, Fried JS, Holcom SS, McKeefry JF (2005) The wildland–urban interface in the United States. Ecological Applications 15, 799–805.
The wildland–urban interface in the United States.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Scarpa R, Thiene M (2005) Destination choice models for rock climbing in the north-eastern Alps: a latent-class approach based on intensity of preferences. Land Economics 81, 426–444.
Destination choice models for rock climbing in the north-eastern Alps: a latent-class approach based on intensity of preferences.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Smith VK, Desvousges W (1987) An empirical analysis of the economic value of risk changes. Journal of Political Economy 95, 89–114.
An empirical analysis of the economic value of risk changes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Train K (2009) ‘Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation.’ (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK)

US Census Bureau (2015) Quickfacts United Stated. Available at http://www.census.gov/quickfacts/table/PST0415215/12 [Verified 1 July 2016]

Walker S, Rideout D, Loomis J, Reich R (2007) Comparing the value of fuel treatment options in northern Colorado’s urban and wildland–urban interface areas. Forest Policy and Economics 9, 694–703.
Comparing the value of fuel treatment options in northern Colorado’s urban and wildland–urban interface areas.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |