International Journal of Wildland Fire International Journal of Wildland Fire Society
Journal of the International Association of Wildland Fire

A comparison of five sampling techniques to estimate surface fuel loading in montane forests*

Pamela G. Sikkink A C and Robert E. Keane B

A Systems for Environmental Management, PO Box 8868, Missoula, MT 59807, USA.

B USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory, 5775 W US Highway 10, Missoula, MT 59808, USA.

C Corrresponding author. Email: pgsikkink@fs.fed.us

International Journal of Wildland Fire 17(3) 363-379 http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/WF07003
Submitted: 5 January 2007  Accepted: 11 August 2007   Published: 23 June 2008


Designing a fuel-sampling program that accurately and efficiently assesses fuel load at relevant spatial scales requires knowledge of each sample method’s strengths and weaknesses. We obtained loading values for six fuel components using five fuel load sampling techniques at five locations in western Montana, USA. The techniques included fixed-area plots, planar intersect, photoloads, a photoload macroplot, and a photo series. For each of the six fuels, we compared (1) the relative differences in load values among techniques and (2) the differences in load between each method and a reference sample. Totals from each method were rated for how much they deviated from totals for the reference in each fuel category. The planar-intersect method, which used 2.50 km of transects, was rated best overall for assessing the six fuels. Bootstrapping showed that at least 1.50 km of transect were needed to obtain estimates that approximate the reference sample. A newly developed photoload method, which compared fuel conditions on the forest floor with sets of pictures calibrated for load by fuel type, compared well with the reference and planar intersect. The commonly used photo series consistently produced higher mean load estimates than any other method for total fine woody debris (0.05–0.20 kg m–2) and logs (0.50–1.25 kg m–2).

Additional keywords: fuel inventory, fuel sampling, line intersect, photoload, photo series.


Albini FA (1976) Estimating wildfire behavior and effects. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, General Technical Report INT-30. (Ogden, UT)

Arcos A, Alvarado E, Sandberg DV (1998) Volume estimation of large woody debris with a stereoscopic vision technique. In ‘Proceedings: 13th Conference on Fire and Forest Meteorology’, 24 October–2 November 1996 Lorne, VIC, Australia. pp. 439–447. (International Association of Wildland Fire)

Bate LJTorgersen TRWisdom MJGarton EO2004Performance of sampling methods to estimate log characteristics for wildlife.Forest Ecology and Management19983102

Bebber DPThomas SC2003Prism sweeps for coarse woody debris.Canadian Journal of Forest Research3317371743

Brown JK1971A planar intersect method for sampling fuel volume and surface area.Forest Science1796102

Brown JK (1974) Handbook for inventorying downed woody material. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, General Technical Report GTR-INT-16. (Ogden, UT)

Brown JK, Oberheu RD, Johnston CM (1982) Handbook for inventorying surface fuels and biomass in the Interior West. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, General Technical Report INT-129. (Ogden, UT)

Busing R, Rimar K, Stolte KW, Stohlgren TJ (1999) Forest health monitoring vegetation pilot field methods guide: vegetation diversity and structure, down woody debris, fuel loading. USDA Forest Service, National Forest Health Monitoring Program. (Research Triangle Park, NC)

Delisle GPWoodard PMTitus SJJohnson AF1988Sample size and variability of fuel weight estimates in natural stands of lodgepole pine.Canadian Journal of Forest Research18649652

DeVries PG1974Multi-stage line intersect sampling.Forest Science20129133

Dibble ACRees CA2005Does the lack of reference ecosystems limit our science? A case study in non-native invasive plants as forest fuels.Journal of Forestry1037329338

Fischer WC (1981a) Photo guide for appraising downed woody fuels in Montana forests: interior ponderosa pine, ponderosa pine–larch–Douglas-fir, larch–Douglas-fir, and interior Douglas-fir cover types. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, General Technical Report INT-97. (Ogden, UT)

Fischer WC (1981b) Photo guides for appraising downed woody fuels in Montana forests: how they were made. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Research Note INT-288. (Ogden, UT)

Fosberg MA1970Drying rates of heartwood below fiber saturation.Forest Science165763

Freese F1960Testing accuracy.Forest Science6139145

Gove JHWilliams MSStahl GDucey MJ2005Critical point relascope sampling for unbiased volume estimation of downed coarse woody debris.Forestry78417431

Hansen MH1985Line intersect sampling of wooded strips.Forest Science31282288

Harmon ME, Sexton J (1996) Guidelines for measurement of woody debris in forest ecosystems. US Long Term Ecological Research Network, University of Washington, Publication No. 20. (Seattle, WA)

Hazard JWPickford SG1978Simulation studies on line intersect sampling of forest residue.Forest Science24469483

Herbeck LA (2000) Analysis of down wood volume and percent ground cover for the Missouri Ozark forest ecosystem project. In ‘Missouri Ozark Forest Ecosystem Project: site history, soils, landforms, woody and herbaceous vegetation, down wood, and inventory methods for the landscape experiment’. (Eds SR Shifley, BL Brookshire) USDA Forest Service, North Central Research Station, General Technical Report NC-208. (St. Paul, MN)

Insightful Corporation (2003) ‘S-Plus 6.2 for Windows Professional Version.’ (Insightful Corporation: Seattle, WA)

Jalonen JVanha-Majamaa ITonteri T1998Optimal sample and plot size for inventory of field and ground layer vegetation in a mature Myrtillus-type boreal spruce forest.Annales Botanici Fennici35191196

Jordan GJDucey MJGove JH2004Comparing line-intersect, fixed-area, and point relascope sampling for dead and downed coarse woody material in a managed northern hardwood forest.Canadian Journal of Forest Research3417661775

Kalabokidis KDOmi PN1998Reduction of fire hazard through thinning/residue disposal in the urban interface.International Journal of Wildland Fire82935doi:10.1071/WF9980029

Keane RE, Dickinson LJ (2007a) Development and evaluation of the photoload sampling technique. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Research paper RMRS-RP-61CD. (Fort Collins, CO)

Keane RE, Dickinson LJ (2007b) The photoload sampling technique: estimating surface fuel loadings from downward-looking photographs of synthetic fuelbeds. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-190. (Fort Collins, CO)

Laverty L, Williams J (2000) Protecting people and sustaining resources in fire-adapted ecosystems – a cohesive strategy. USDA Forest Service, Forest Service response to General Accounting Office Report GAO/RCED 99–65. (Washington, DC)

Levene H (1960) Robust tests for equality of variance. In ‘Contributions to Probability and Statistics’. (Eds I Olkin, SG Ghurye, W Hoeffeling, WG Madow, HB Mann) pp. 278–292. (Stanford University Press: Stanford, CA)

Lutes DC (1999) A comparison of methods for the quantification of coarse woody debris and identification of its spatial scale: a study from the Tenderfoot Experimental Forest, Montana. MSc Thesis, the University of Montana.

Lutes DC, Keane RE, Caratti JF, Key CH, Benson NC, Sutherland S, Gangi LJ (2006) FIREMON: Fire effects monitoring and inventory system. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-164-CD. (Fort Collins, CO)

Maxwell WG, Ward FR (1976) Photo series for quantifying forest residues in the coastal Douglas-fir–hemlock type, coastal Douglas-fir–hardwood type. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, General Technical Report PNW-51. (Portland, OR)

Mueller-Dombois D, Ellenberg H (1974) ‘Aims and Methods of Vegetation Ecology.’ (Wiley: New York)

Nemec Linnell AF, Davis G (2002) Efficiency of six line intersect sampling designs for estimating volume and density of coarse woody debris. Vancouver Forest District, Research Section, Technical Report TR-021/2002. (Nanaimo, BC)

Ottmar RD, Vihnanek RE, Wright CS (2000) Stereo photoseries for quantifying natural fuels. Volume III: lodgepole pine, quaking aspen, and gambel oak types in the Rocky Mountains. National Wildfire Coordination Group, National Interagency Fire Center, PMS-832. (Boise, ID)

Pickford SGHazard JW1978Simulation studies in the line intersect sampling of forest residue.Forest Science24469483

Reinhardt E, Keane RE, Brown JK (1997) First Order Fire Effects Model: FOFEM 4.0 user’s guide. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, General Technical Report INT-GTR-344. (Ogden, UT)

Reynolds MRJr1984Estimating the error in model predictions.Forest Science30454469

Rothermel RC (1972) A mathematical model for predicting fire spread in wildland fuels. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Research Paper INT-115. (Ogden, UT)

Sandberg DVOttmar RDCushon GH2001Characterizing fuels in the 21st century.International Journal of Wildland Fire10381387

Stahl G1998Transect relascope sampling – a method for the quantification of coarse woody debris.Forest Science445863

Thorne MSSkinner QDSmith MARodgers JDLaycock WACerekci SA2002Evaluation of a technique for measuring canopy volume of shrubs.Journal of Range Management55235241

van Wagtendonk JWBenedict JMSydoriak WM1996Physical properties of woody fuel particles of Sierra Nevada conifers.International Journal of Wildland Fire6117123doi:10.1071/WF9960117

Van Wagner CE1968The line intersect method in forest fuel sampling.Forest Science142026

Waddell KL2002Sampling coarse woody debris for multiple attributes in extensive resource inventories.Ecological Indicators1139153

Warren WGOlsen PF1964A line intersect technique for assessing logging waste.Forest Science10267276

Williams MSGove JH2003Perpendicular distance sampling: an alternative method for sampling downed coarse woody debris.Canadian Journal of Forest Research3315641579

Woldendorp GKeenan RJBarry SSpencer DR2004Analysis of sampling methods for coarse woody debris.Forest Ecology and Management198133148doi:10.1016/J.FORECO.2004.03.042

Supplementary MaterialSupplementary Material 38 KB Export Citation