Register      Login
International Journal of Wildland Fire International Journal of Wildland Fire Society
Journal of the International Association of Wildland Fire
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Fly and wasp diversity responds to elements of both the visible and invisible fire mosaic

Julian Brown A B and Alan York A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A School of Ecosystem and Forest Sciences, University of Melbourne, 4 Water Street, Creswick, Vic. 3363, Australia.

B Corresponding author. Emails: julian.macpherson.brown@gmail.com

International Journal of Wildland Fire 26(5) 434-443 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF16189
Submitted: 16 October 2016  Accepted: 25 February 2017   Published: 4 April 2017

Abstract

It is increasingly recognised that fire management for biodiversity conservation must account for two kinds of landscape mosaics: 1) the ‘visible’ mosaic of post-fire age classes as it relates to organism responses to the most recent fire events; and 2) the ‘invisible’ mosaic of inter-fire intervals, frequencies and other components of the fire regime as they relate to the cumulative effects of multiple fires. Patch mosaic burning (PMB) aims to create landscape mosaics of fire ages to cater for the needs of a diversity of species differing in their age class preferences, but empirical studies often fail to detect a link between species richness and the visible mosaic. Empirical studies of cumulative effects have so far related species richness to the fire regimes of sample locations rather than the invisible mosaic, within which sample locations are embedded. Invertebrate responses to landscape fire mosaics are particularly poorly understood, so we investigated relationships between fire history heterogeneity and fly and wasp species richness. We find support for the PMB paradigm and the notion the invisible mosaic influences species richness. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first empirical test of the invisible mosaic’s influence on animal communities.

Additional keywords: biodiversity, fire frequency.


References

Adams P, Lawson S (1993) Pollination in Australian Orchids: a Critical-Assessment of the Literature 1882–1992. Australian Journal of Botany 41, 553–575.
Pollination in Australian Orchids: a Critical-Assessment of the Literature 1882–1992.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Allouche O, Kalyuzhny M, Moreno-Rueda G, Pizarro M, Kadmon R (2012) Area–heterogeneity tradeoff and the diversity of ecological communities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 109, 17495–17500.
Area–heterogeneity tradeoff and the diversity of ecological communities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38XhvVSltLvJ&md5=a282d7a23d4668f74110602173fced5bCAS |

Andersen AN, Ribbons RR, Pettit M, Parr CL (2014) Burning for biodiversity: highly resilient ant communities respond only to strongly contrasting fire regimes in Australia’s seasonal tropics. Journal of Applied Ecology 51, 1406–1413.
Burning for biodiversity: highly resilient ant communities respond only to strongly contrasting fire regimes in Australia’s seasonal tropics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Barton K (2014) ‘MuMIn: multi-model inference.’ (R package version 1.10.5) Available at http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=MuMIn [Verified 21 February 2016]

Bjornstad ON (2013) ‘ncf: spatial nonparametric covariance functions.’ (R package version 1.1–5) Available at http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ncf [Verified 21 February 2016]

Bowman DM, Perry GL, Higgins SI, Johnson CN, Fuhlendorf SD, Murphy BP (2016) Pyrodiversity is the coupling of biodiversity and fire regimes in food webs. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 371, 20150169
Pyrodiversity is the coupling of biodiversity and fire regimes in food webs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bradstock R, Bedward M, Gill A, Cohn J (2005) Which mosaic? A landscape ecological approach for evaluating interactions between fire regimes, habitat and animals. Wildlife Research 32, 409–423.
Which mosaic? A landscape ecological approach for evaluating interactions between fire regimes, habitat and animals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bradstock RA, Williams RJ, Gill AM (2012) Future fire regimes of Australian ecosystems: new perspectives on enduring questions of management. In ‘Flammable Australia: fire regimes, biodiversity and ecosystems in a changing world.’ (Eds R Williams, AM Gill, RA Bradstock) pp. 307–24. (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne)

Brittain C, Kremen C, Klein AM (2013) Biodiversity buffers pollination from changes in environmental conditions. Global Change Biology 19, 540–547.
Biodiversity buffers pollination from changes in environmental conditions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Brown J, York A, Christie F (2016) Fire effects on pollination in a sexually deceptive orchid. International Journal of Wildland Fire 25, 888–895.
Fire effects on pollination in a sexually deceptive orchid.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Brown J, York A, Christie F, McCarthy M (2017) Effects of fire on pollinators and pollination. Journal of Applied Ecology 54, 313–322.
Effects of fire on pollinators and pollination.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) ‘Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach.’ (Springer Science & Business Media: New York

Cane JH, Neff JL (2011) Predicted fates of ground-nesting bees in soil heated by wildfire: thermal tolerances of life stages and a survey of nesting depths. Biological Conservation 144, 2631–2636.
Predicted fates of ground-nesting bees in soil heated by wildfire: thermal tolerances of life stages and a survey of nesting depths.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cheal DC (2010) Growth stages and tolerable fire intervals for Victoria’s native vegetation data sets. Victorian Department of Sustainability and Environment, Melbourne.

Davies AB, Eggleton P, van Rensburg BJ, Parr CL (2012) The pyrodiversity–biodiversity hypothesis: a test with savanna termite assemblages. Journal of Applied Ecology 49, 422–430.
The pyrodiversity–biodiversity hypothesis: a test with savanna termite assemblages.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Di Stefano J, McCarthy MA, York A, Duff TJ, Slingo J, Christie F (2013) Defining vegetation age class distributions for multispecies conservation in fire-prone landscapes. Biological Conservation 166, 111–117.
Defining vegetation age class distributions for multispecies conservation in fire-prone landscapes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Dodson J (2001) Holocene vegetation change in the Mediterranean-type climate regions of Australia. The Holocene 11, 673–680.
Holocene vegetation change in the Mediterranean-type climate regions of Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Driscoll DA, Lindenmayer DB, Bennett AF, Bode M, Bradstock RA, Cary GJ, Clarke MF, Dexter N, Fensham R, Friend G (2010) Fire management for biodiversity conservation: key research questions and our capacity to answer them. Biological Conservation 143, 1928–1939.
Fire management for biodiversity conservation: key research questions and our capacity to answer them.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Farnsworth LM, Nimmo DG, Kelly LT, Bennett AF, Clarke MF (2014) Does pyrodiversity beget alpha, beta or gamma diversity? A case study using reptiles from semi‐arid Australia. Diversity & Distributions 20, 663–673.
Does pyrodiversity beget alpha, beta or gamma diversity? A case study using reptiles from semi‐arid Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Fox BJ (1982) Fire and mammalian secondary succession in an Australian coastal heath. Ecology 63, 1332–1341.
Fire and mammalian secondary succession in an Australian coastal heath.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gaskett A (2011) Orchid pollination by sexual deception: pollinator perspectives. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 86, 33–75.
Orchid pollination by sexual deception: pollinator perspectives.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3M7itlKksA%3D%3D&md5=80f6feb791602dbe06edd2dc0ab612a5CAS |

Gibb H, Hilszczański J, Hjältén J, Danell K, Ball J, Pettersson R, Alinvi O (2008) Responses of parasitoids to saproxylic hosts and habitat: a multi-scale study using experimental logs. Oecologia 155, 63–74.
Responses of parasitoids to saproxylic hosts and habitat: a multi-scale study using experimental logs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1c%2FlvFOltA%3D%3D&md5=0925a52f7ba35b8043e0106b605d437aCAS |

   (a) Gibbons FR, Downes RG (1964) ‘A study of the land in south-western Victoria.’ (Soil Conservation Authority: Melbourne, Vic.)

Hoehn P, Tscharntke T, Tylianakis JM, Steffan-Dewenter I (2008) Functional group diversity of bee pollinators increases crop yield. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 275, 2283–2291.
Functional group diversity of bee pollinators increases crop yield.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Jolly WM, Cochrane MA, Freeborn PH, Holden ZA, Brown TJ, Williamson GJ, Bowman DM (2015) Climate-induced variations in global wildfire danger from 1979 to 2013. Nature Communications 6, 7537
Climate-induced variations in global wildfire danger from 1979 to 2013.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2MXhtlCjsb7P&md5=ff750f2ac949f4ba0574f77ed1c93945CAS |

Kelly LT, Nimmo DG, Spence‐Bailey LM, Taylor RS, Watson SJ, Clarke MF, Bennett AF (2012) Managing fire mosaics for small mammal conservation: a landscape perspective. Journal of Applied Ecology 49, 412–421.
Managing fire mosaics for small mammal conservation: a landscape perspective.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kelly LT, Bennett AF, Clarke MF, McCarthy MA (2015) Optimal fire histories for biodiversity conservation. Conservation Biology 29, 473–481.
Optimal fire histories for biodiversity conservation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kleijn D, Van Langevelde F (2006) Interacting effects of landscape context and habitat quality on flower visiting insects in agricultural landscapes. Basic and Applied Ecology 7, 201–214.

Larson B, Kevan P, Inouye D (2001) Flies and flowers: taxonomic diversity of anthophiles and pollinators. Canadian Entomologist 133, 439–465.
Flies and flowers: taxonomic diversity of anthophiles and pollinators.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Legendre P, Legendre LF (2012) ‘Numerical ecology.’ (Elsevier: Amsterdam, Netherlands)

Maravalhas J, Vasconcelos HL (2014) Revisiting the pyrodiversity–biodiversity hypothesis: long‐term fire regimes and the structure of ant communities in a Neotropical savanna hotspot. Journal of Applied Ecology 51, 1661–1668.
Revisiting the pyrodiversity–biodiversity hypothesis: long‐term fire regimes and the structure of ant communities in a Neotropical savanna hotspot.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Mazerolle MJ, Mazerolle MMJ (2016) Package ‘AICcmodavg’. Available at https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/AICcmodavg/index.html [Verified 21 February 2016]

Meyer B, Jauker F, Steffan-Dewenter I (2009) Contrasting resource-dependent responses of hoverfly richness and density to landscape structure. Basic and Applied Ecology 10, 178–186.
Contrasting resource-dependent responses of hoverfly richness and density to landscape structure.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

McCarthy M, Cary G (2002) Fire regimes in landscapes: models and realities. In ‘Flammable Australia: the fire regimes and biodiversity of a continent.’ (Eds R Bradstock, J Williams, A Gill) pp. 76–93. (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK)

Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: biodiversity synthesis. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC. Available at http://www.millenniumassessment.org/documents/document.354.aspx.pdf [Verified 27 February 2017]

Noble IR, Slatyer R (1980) The use of vital attributes to predict successional changes in plant communities subject to recurrent disturbances. Vegetatio 43, 5–21.
The use of vital attributes to predict successional changes in plant communities subject to recurrent disturbances.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Orford KA, Vaughan IP, Memmott J (2015) The forgotten flies: the importance of non-syrphid Diptera as pollinators. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 282, 20142934
The forgotten flies: the importance of non-syrphid Diptera as pollinators.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

   (a) Parks Victoria (2003) Grampians National Park Management Plan. Victorian Department of Sustainability and Environment, Melbourne, Vic. Available at http://parkweb.vic.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0018/313281/grampiansnp- mp.pdf [Verified 11 May 2016]

Parr CL, Andersen AN (2006) Patch mosaic burning for biodiversity conservation: a critique of the pyrodiversity paradigm. Conservation Biology 20, 1610–1619.
Patch mosaic burning for biodiversity conservation: a critique of the pyrodiversity paradigm.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Phillips RD, Scaccabarozzi D, Retter BA, Hayes C, Brown GR, Dixon KW, Peakall R (2014) Caught in the act: pollination of sexually deceptive trap-flowers by fungus gnats in Pterostylis (Orchidaceae). Annals of Botany 113, 629–641.
Caught in the act: pollination of sexually deceptive trap-flowers by fungus gnats in Pterostylis (Orchidaceae).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ponisio LC, Wilkin K, M’Gonigle LK, Kulhanek K, Cook L, Thorp R, Griswold T, Kremen C (2016) Pyrodiversity begets plant–pollinator community diversity. Global Change Biology 22, 1794–1808.
Pyrodiversity begets plant–pollinator community diversity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Potts SG, Vulliamy B, Dafni A, Ne’eman G, O’Toole C, Roberts S, Willmer P (2003) Response of plant‐pollinator communities to fire: changes in diversity, abundance and floral reward structure. Oikos 101, 103–112.
Response of plant‐pollinator communities to fire: changes in diversity, abundance and floral reward structure.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Potts SG, Biesmeijer JC, Kremen C, Neumann P, Schweiger O, Kunin WE (2010) Global pollinator declines: trends, impacts and drivers. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 25, 345–353.
Global pollinator declines: trends, impacts and drivers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Quinn GP, Keough MJ (2002) ‘Experimental design and data analysis for biologists.’ (Cambridge University Press: Melbourne

R Core Team (2014) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. (R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria) Available at http://www.R-project.org/ [Verified 27 February 2017]

Rogers SR, Tarpy DR, Burrack HJ (2014) Bee species diversity enhances productivity and stability in a perennial crop. PLoS One 9, e97307
Bee species diversity enhances productivity and stability in a perennial crop.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Roland J, Taylor PD (1997) Insect parasitoid species respond to forest structure at different spatial scales. Nature 386, 710–713.
Insect parasitoid species respond to forest structure at different spatial scales.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK2sXislOgu7g%3D&md5=f05259b64f5f880a0e57613659a710afCAS |

Schiegg K (2000) Effects of dead wood volume and connectivity on saproxylic insect species diversity. Ecoscience 7, 290–298.
Effects of dead wood volume and connectivity on saproxylic insect species diversity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Sitters H, Christie F, Di Stefano J, Swan M, Collins P, York A (2014a) Associations between occupancy and habitat structure can predict avian responses to disturbance: implications for conservation management. Forest Ecology and Management 331, 227–236.
Associations between occupancy and habitat structure can predict avian responses to disturbance: implications for conservation management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Sitters H, Christie FJ, Di Stefano J, Swan M, Penman T, Collins PC, York A (2014b) Avian responses to the diversity and configuration of fire age classes and vegetation types across a rainfall gradient. Forest Ecology and Management 318, 13–20.
Avian responses to the diversity and configuration of fire age classes and vegetation types across a rainfall gradient.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Šmilauer P, Lepš J (2014) ‘Multivariate analysis of ecological data using CANOCO 5.’ (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, New York)

Steffan-Dewenter I, Münzenberg U, Bürger C, Thies C, Tscharntke T (2002) Scale-dependent effects of landscape context on three pollinator guilds. Ecology 83, 1421–1432.
Scale-dependent effects of landscape context on three pollinator guilds.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Swan M, Christie FJ, Sitters H, York A, Di Stefano J (2015) Predicting faunal fire responses in heterogeneous landscapes: the role of habitat structure. Ecological Applications 25, 2293–2305.
Predicting faunal fire responses in heterogeneous landscapes: the role of habitat structure.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Taylor RS, Watson SJ, Nimmo DG, Kelly LT, Bennett AF, Clarke MF (2012) Landscape‐scale effects of fire on bird assemblages: does pyrodiversity beget biodiversity? Diversity & Distributions 18, 519–529.
Landscape‐scale effects of fire on bird assemblages: does pyrodiversity beget biodiversity?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

ter Braak CJ, Prentice IC, Caswell H (1988) A theory of gradient analysis. Advances in Ecological Research 18, 271–317.

Vanbergen AJ, Baude M, Biesmeijer JC, Britton NF, Brown MJ, Brown M, Bryden J, Budge GE, Bull JC, Carvell C (2013) Threats to an ecosystem service: pressures on pollinators. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 11, 251–259.
Threats to an ecosystem service: pressures on pollinators.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Westphal C, Steffan-Dewenter I, Tscharntke T (2006) Bumblebees experience landscapes at different spatial scales: possible implications for coexistence. Oecologia 149, 289–300.
Bumblebees experience landscapes at different spatial scales: possible implications for coexistence.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Whelan R, Rodgerson L, Dickman CR, Sutherland EF (2002) Critical life cycles of plants and animals: developing a process-based understanding of population changes in fire-prone landscapes. In ‘Flammable Australia: the fire regimes and biodiversity of a continent.’ (Ed. R Williams, AM Gill, RA Bradstock) pp. 94–124. (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne)

Wiens JA (1989) Spatial scaling in ecology. Functional Ecology 3, 385–397.
Spatial scaling in ecology.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Williams RJ, Bradstock RA, Cary GJ, Enright N, Gill A, Leidloff A, Lucas C, Whelan R, Andersen A, Bowman D (2009) Interactions between climate change, fire regimes and biodiversity in Australia: a preliminary assessment. Report to the Department of Climate Change and the Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage, and the Arts, Canberra.

Willmer P (2011) ‘Pollination and floral ecology.’ (Princeton University Press: Princeton)

Woinarski J (2005) Living with fire – birds in Northern Australia. Wingspan 15, 7–9.

York A (1999) Long-term effects of frequent low-intensity burning on the abundance of litter-dwelling invertebrates in coastal blackbutt forests of southeastern Australia. Journal of Insect Conservation 3, 191–199.
Long-term effects of frequent low-intensity burning on the abundance of litter-dwelling invertebrates in coastal blackbutt forests of southeastern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |