Register      Login
International Journal of Wildland Fire International Journal of Wildland Fire Society
Journal of the International Association of Wildland Fire
RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)

Where wildfires destroy buildings in the US relative to the wildland–urban interface and national fire outreach programs

H. Anu Kramer A D , Miranda H. Mockrin B , Patricia M. Alexandre C , Susan I. Stewart A and Volker C. Radeloff A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A SILVIS Lab, Department of Forest and Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1630 Linden Drive, Madison, WI 53706, USA.

B Northern Research Station, USDA Forest Service, 5523 Research Park Dr Suite 350, Baltimore, MD 21228, USA.

C Forest Research Centre, School of Agriculture, University of Lisbon, Tapada da Ajuda, PT-1349-017 Lisboa, Portugal.

D Corresponding author. Email: hakramer@wisc.edu

International Journal of Wildland Fire 27(5) 329-341 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF17135
Submitted: 26 August 2017  Accepted: 13 March 2018   Published: 24 April 2018

Journal Compilation © IAWF 2018 Open Access CC BY-NC-ND

Abstract

Over the past 30 years, the cost of wildfire suppression and homes lost to wildfire in the US have increased dramatically, driven in part by the expansion of the wildland–urban interface (WUI), where buildings and wildland vegetation meet. In response, the wildfire management community has devoted substantial effort to better understand where buildings and vegetation co-occur, and to establish outreach programs to reduce wildfire damage to homes. However, the extent to which the location of buildings affected by wildfire overlaps the WUI, and where and when outreach programs are established relative to wildfire, is unclear. We found that most threatened and destroyed buildings in the conterminous US were within the WUI (59 and 69% respectively), but this varied considerably among states. Buildings closest to existing Firewise communities sustained lower rates of destruction than further distances. Fires with the greatest building loss were close to outreach programs, but the nearest Firewise community was established after wildfires had occurred for 76% of destroyed buildings. In these locations, and areas new to the WUI or where the fire regime is predicted to change, pre-emptive outreach could improve the likelihood of building survival and reduce the human and financial costs of structure loss.

Additional keywords: Firewise, natural disaster, risk, WUI.


References

Abatzoglou JT, Williams AP (2016) Impact of anthropogenic climate change on wildfire across western US forests. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 113, 11770–11775.
Impact of anthropogenic climate change on wildfire across western US forests.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC28Xhs1elur3K&md5=adc1c122ca004fbc9bfa5a07150a254fCAS |

Alexandre PM, Mockrin MH, Stewart SI, Hammer RB, Radeloff VC (2015) Rebuilding and new housing development after wildfire. International Journal of Wildland Fire 24, 138–149.
Rebuilding and new housing development after wildfire.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Alexandre PM, Stewart SI, Keuler NS, Clayton MK, Mockrin MH, Bar‐Massada A, Syphard AD, Radeloff VC (2016) Factors related to building loss due to wildfires in the conterminous United States. Ecological Applications 26, 2323–2338.
Factors related to building loss due to wildfires in the conterminous United States.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Argañaraz J, Radeloff V, Bar-Massada A, Gavier-Pizarro G, Scavuzzo C, Bellis L (2017) Assessing wildfire exposure in the wildland–urban interface area of the mountains of central Argentina. Journal of Environmental Management 196, 499–510.
Assessing wildfire exposure in the wildland–urban interface area of the mountains of central Argentina.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Association for Fire Ecology (2015) Reduce wildfire risks or we’ll continue to pay more for fire disasters. Available at http://fireecology.org/Resources/Documents/Reduce-Wildfire-Risk-16-April-2015-Final-Print.pdf [Verified 22 February 2017]

Bar-Massada A, Stewart SI, Hammer RB, Mockrin MH, Radeloff VC (2013) Using structure locations as a basis for mapping the wildland–urban interface. Journal of Environmental Management 128, 540–547.
Using structure locations as a basis for mapping the wildland–urban interface.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Birkland TA (2006) ‘Lessons of disaster: policy change after catastrophic events.’ (Georgetown University Press: Washington, DC, USA)

California Fire Safe Council (2016) California Fire Safe Council: map of local fire safe councils. Available at http://www.cafiresafecouncil.org/index2.php/?page_id=1155 [Verified 15 December 2016]

Calkin DE, Gebert KM, Jones JG, Neilson RP (2005) Forest Service large fire area burned and suppression expenditure trends, 1970–2002. Journal of Forestry 103, 179–183.

Calkin DE, Rieck JD, Hyde KD, Kaiden JD (2011a) Built structure identification in wildland fire decision support. International Journal of Wildland Fire 20, 78–90.

Calkin DC, Finney MA, Ager AA, Thompson MP, Gebert KM (2011b) Progress towards and barriers to implementation of a risk framework for US federal wildland fire policy and decision making. Forest Policy and Economics 13, 378–389.
Progress towards and barriers to implementation of a risk framework for US federal wildland fire policy and decision making.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Calkin DE, Cohen JD, Finney MA, Thompson MP (2014) How risk management can prevent future wildfire disasters in the wildland–urban interface. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 111, 746–751.
How risk management can prevent future wildfire disasters in the wildland–urban interface.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2cXotFCgug%3D%3D&md5=cfdb2d5a3108bd05cefd8f9ab300109aCAS |

Champ PA, Brenkert‐Smith H (2016) Is seeing believing? Perceptions of wildfire risk over time. Risk Analysis 36, 816–830.
Is seeing believing? Perceptions of wildfire risk over time.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Chas-Amil M, Touza J, García-Martínez E (2013) Forest fires in the wildland–urban interface: a spatial analysis of forest fragmentation and human impacts. Applied Geography 43, 127–137.
Forest fires in the wildland–urban interface: a spatial analysis of forest fragmentation and human impacts.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Clark AM, Rashford BS, McLeod DM, Lieske SN, Coupal RH, Albeke SE (2016) The impact of residential development pattern on wildland fire suppression expenditures. Land Economics 92, 656–678.
The impact of residential development pattern on wildland fire suppression expenditures.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cohen JD (2000) Preventing disaster: home ignitability in the wildland–urban interface. Journal of Forestry 98, 15–21.

Collins TW, Bolin B (2009) Situating hazard vulnerability: people’s negotiations with wildfire environments in the US Southwest. Environmental Management 44, 441–455.
Situating hazard vulnerability: people’s negotiations with wildfire environments in the US Southwest.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Dillon GK, Menakis J, Fay F (2015) Wildland fire potential: a tool for assessing wildfire risk and fuels management needs. In ‘Proceedings of the large wildland fires conference’, 19–23 May 2014, Missoula, MT. (Eds RE Keane, M Jolly, R Parsons, K Riley) USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Proceedings RMRS-P-73, pp. 60–76. (Fort Collins, CO, USA)

Duerksen C, Elliot D, Anthony P (2011) Addressing Community Wildfire Risk: A Review and Assessment of Regulatory and Planning Tools. The Fire Protection Research Foundation, Quincy, MA, USA.

Finney MA, McHugh CW, Grenfell IC, Riley KL, Short KC (2011) A simulation of probabilistic wildfire risk components for the continental United States. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment 25, 973–1000.
A simulation of probabilistic wildfire risk components for the continental United States.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gaither CJ, Poudyal NC, Goodrick S, Bowker J, Malone S, Gan J (2011) Wildland fire risk and social vulnerability in the southeastern United States: an exploratory spatial data analysis approach. Forest Policy and Economics 13, 24–36.
Wildland fire risk and social vulnerability in the southeastern United States: an exploratory spatial data analysis approach.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Glickman D, Babbitt B (2001) Urban–wildland interface communities within the vicinity of federal lands that are at high risk from wildfire. Federal Register 66, 751–777.

Gude PH, Jones K, Rasker R, Greenwood MC (2013) Evidence for the effect of homes on wildfire suppression costs. International Journal of Wildland Fire 22, 537–548.
Evidence for the effect of homes on wildfire suppression costs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Haas JR, Calkin DE, Thompson MP (2013) A national approach for integrating wildfire simulation modeling into wildland–urban interface risk assessments within the United States. Landscape and Urban Planning 119, 44–53.
A national approach for integrating wildfire simulation modeling into wildland–urban interface risk assessments within the United States.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hammer RB, Radeloff VC, Fried JS, Stewart SI (2007) Wildland–urban interface housing growth during the 1990s in California, Oregon, and Washington. International Journal of Wildland Fire 16, 255–265.
Wildland–urban interface housing growth during the 1990s in California, Oregon, and Washington.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hand MS, Thompson MP, Calkin DE (2016) Examining heterogeneity and wildfire management expenditures using spatially and temporally descriptive data. Journal of Forest Economics 22, 80–102.
Examining heterogeneity and wildfire management expenditures using spatially and temporally descriptive data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hawbaker TJ, Radeloff VC, Stewart SI, Hammer RB, Keuler NS, Clayton MK (2013) Human and biophysical influences on fire occurrence in the United States. Ecological Applications 23, 565–582.
Human and biophysical influences on fire occurrence in the United States.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hessburg PF, Agee JK, Franklin JF (2005) Dry forests and wildland fires of the inland Northwest USA: contrasting the landscape ecology of the pre-settlement and modern eras. Forest Ecology and Management 211, 117–139.
Dry forests and wildland fires of the inland Northwest USA: contrasting the landscape ecology of the pre-settlement and modern eras.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Jakes PJ, Sturtevant V (2013) Trial by fire: community wildfire protection plans put to the test. International Journal of Wildland Fire 22, 1134–1143.
Trial by fire: community wildfire protection plans put to the test.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lampin-Maillet C, Jappiot M, Long M, Bouillon C, Morge D, Ferrier J-P (2010) Mapping wildland-urban interfaces at large scales integrating housing density and vegetation aggregation for fire prevention in the South of France. Journal of Environmental Management 91, 732–741.
Mapping wildland-urban interfaces at large scales integrating housing density and vegetation aggregation for fire prevention in the South of France.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

McGee TK (2011) Public engagement in neighbourhood level wildfire mitigation and preparedness: case studies from Canada, the US and Australia. Journal of Environmental Management 92, 2524–2532.
Public engagement in neighbourhood level wildfire mitigation and preparedness: case studies from Canada, the US and Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3MjitlKnug%3D%3D&md5=08743dfa699dda1421f21160afe0d8ecCAS |

McLennan J, Every D, Bearman C, Wright L (2017) On the concept of denial of natural hazard risk and its use in relation to householder wildfire safety in Australia. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 21, 176–186.
On the concept of denial of natural hazard risk and its use in relation to householder wildfire safety in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Mhawej M, Faour G, Adjizian-Gerard J (2017) Establishing the wildland–urban interface building risk index (WUIBRI): the case study of Beit-Meri. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 24, 175–183.
Establishing the wildland–urban interface building risk index (WUIBRI): the case study of Beit-Meri.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Mockrin MH, Stewart SI, Radeloff VC, Hammer RB (2016) Recovery and adaptation after wildfire on the Colorado Front Range (2010–12). International Journal of Wildland Fire 25, 1144–1155.
Recovery and adaptation after wildfire on the Colorado Front Range (2010–12).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Moritz MA, Batllori E, Bradstock RA, Gill AM, Handmer J, Hessburg PF, Leonard J, McCaffrey S, Odion DC, Schoennagel T (2014) Learning to coexist with wildfire. Nature 515, 58–66.
Learning to coexist with wildfire.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2cXitFanu77P&md5=6dad93613a51010175b7d51f43b37939CAS |

National Wildfire Coordinating Group (2016) SIT-209. Available at https://fam.nwcg.gov/fam-web/hist_209/report_list_209 [Verified 15 December 2016]

Obama B (2016) Executive Order – wildland–urban interface federal risk mitigation. The White House, Washington, DC, USA.

Ojerio R, Moseley C, Lynn K, Bania N (2010) Limited involvement of socially vulnerable populations in federal programs to mitigate wildfire risk in Arizona. Natural Hazards Review 12, 28–36.
Limited involvement of socially vulnerable populations in federal programs to mitigate wildfire risk in Arizona.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Olsen C, Kline J, Ager A, Olsen K, Short K (2017) Examining the influence of biophysical conditions on wildland–urban interface homeowners’ wildfire risk mitigation activities in fire-prone landscapes. Ecology and Society 22, 21
Examining the influence of biophysical conditions on wildland–urban interface homeowners’ wildfire risk mitigation activities in fire-prone landscapes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Paveglio T, Edgeley C (2017) Community diversity and hazard events: understanding the evolution of local approaches to wildfire. Natural Hazards 87, 1083–1108.
Community diversity and hazard events: understanding the evolution of local approaches to wildfire.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Paveglio TB, Kelly E (2017) Influences on the adoption and implementation of a wildfire mitigation program in an Idaho City. Journal of Forestry 116, 47–54.
Influences on the adoption and implementation of a wildfire mitigation program in an Idaho City.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Paveglio TB, Nielsen-Pincus M, Abrams J, Moseley C (2017) Advancing characterization of social diversity in the wildland-urban interface: an indicator approach for wildfire management. Landscape and Urban Planning 160, 115–126.
Advancing characterization of social diversity in the wildland-urban interface: an indicator approach for wildfire management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Price O, Bradstock R (2013) Landscape scale influences of forest area and housing density on house loss in the 2009 Victorian bushfires. PLoS One 8, e73421
Landscape scale influences of forest area and housing density on house loss in the 2009 Victorian bushfires.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXhsVWht7rJ&md5=8da32ba935c00a3f4982af7353d3c927CAS |

Radeloff VC, Hammer RB, Stewart SI, Fried JS, Holcomb SS, McKeefry JF (2005) The wildland–urban interface in the United States. Ecological Applications 15, 799–805.
The wildland–urban interface in the United States.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Radeloff V, Helmers DP, Kramer Ha, Mockrin MH, Alexandre PM, Bar-Massada A, Butsic V, Hawbaker T, Martinuzzi S, Syphard AD, Stewart S (2018) Rapid growth of the US wildland–urban interface increases wildfire risk. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 115, 3314–3319.
Rapid growth of the US wildland–urban interface increases wildfire risk.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Richardson LA, Champ PA, Loomis JB (2012) The hidden cost of wildfires: economic valuation of health effects of wildfire smoke exposure in Southern California. Journal of Forest Economics 18, 14–35.
The hidden cost of wildfires: economic valuation of health effects of wildfire smoke exposure in Southern California.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Schoennagel T, Nelson CR, Theobald DM, Carnwath GC, Chapman TB (2009) Implementation of National Fire Plan treatments near the wildland–urban interface in the western United States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106, 10706–10711.
Implementation of National Fire Plan treatments near the wildland–urban interface in the western United States.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXos1ajsbc%3D&md5=c3f4779f8f5916f9483f50ebbfad8f5aCAS |

Schoennagel T, Balch JK, Brenkert-Smith H, Dennison PE, Harvey BJ, Krawchuk MA, Mietkiewicz N, Morgan P, Moritz MA, Rasker R (2017) Adapt to more wildfire in western North American forests as climate changes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 114, 4582–4590.
Adapt to more wildfire in western North American forests as climate changes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2sXmtFGgu78%3D&md5=3e9664fccadcf6763c737e516f5f81e1CAS |

Singer A, Jetter AJ, Ellsworth LM, Gray SA, Zhang P, Laraichi MO (2017) Policy scenarios for fire-adapted communities: understanding stakeholder risk perceptions in Ashland, Oregon. Ver. 1.0; based on results of JFSP 14-2-01-26, March 6, 2017. Available at https://static1.squarespace.com/static/56eb240ab654f9cd9f495b83/t/58c1cd0f3a04110deee4eaa6/1489095961499/V1Ashland+Case+Study.pdf [Verified 11 April 2018]

Skowronski NS, Haag S, Trimble J, Clark KL, Gallagher MR, Lathrop RG (2016) Structure-level fuel load assessment in the wildland–urban interface: a fusion of airborne laser scanning and spectral remote-sensing methodologies. International Journal of Wildland Fire 25, 547–557.
Structure-level fuel load assessment in the wildland–urban interface: a fusion of airborne laser scanning and spectral remote-sensing methodologies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Solecki WD, Michaels S (1994) Looking through the postdisaster policy window. Environmental Management 18, 587–595.
Looking through the postdisaster policy window.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Syphard AD, Massada AB, Butsic V, Keeley JE (2013) Land use planning and wildfire: development policies influence future probability of housing loss. PLoS One 8, e71708
Land use planning and wildfire: development policies influence future probability of housing loss.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXhtleru7fI&md5=4591060cb6c567390ca49be59bad2d5cCAS |

Syphard AD, Brennan TJ, Keeley JE (2017) The importance of building construction materials relative to other factors affecting structure survival during wildfire. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 21, 140–147.
The importance of building construction materials relative to other factors affecting structure survival during wildfire.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Theobald DM, Romme WH (2007) Expansion of the US wildland–urban interface. Landscape and Urban Planning 83, 340–354.
Expansion of the US wildland–urban interface.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

United States Congress (2003) Healthy Forests Restoration Act. Committee on House Agriculture; House Resources; House Judiciary; Senate Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry; Senate Energy and Natural Resources; House Transportation and Infrastructure. 108th Congress, 1st session. 2003. Public Law number 108–148, Washington, DC, USA.

US Department of Agriculture and US Department of the Interior (1995) ‘Federal wildland fire management policy and program review.’ (USDA: Washington, DC, USA)

Westhaver A (2016) Why some homes survived: learning from the Fort McMurray wildland–urban interface fire disaster; preliminary report. Institute for Catastrophic Loss Reduction. Toronto, ON, Canada.

Wigtil G, Hammer RB, Kline JD, Mockrin MH, Stewart SI, Roper D, Radeloff VC (2016) Places where wildfire potential and social vulnerability coincide in the coterminous United States. International Journal of Wildland Fire 25, 896–908.
Places where wildfire potential and social vulnerability coincide in the coterminous United States.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wildland Fire Executive Council (2014) The National Strategy: the final phase in the development of the National Cohesive Wildland Fire Management Strategy. Available at https://www.forestsandrangelands.gov/strategy/documents/strategy/CSPhaseIIINationalStrategyApr2014.pdf [Verified 23 May 2017]

Wilmer B, Aplet G (2005) ‘Targeting the community fire planning zone: mapping matters.’ (The Wilderness Sociey: Washington, DC, USA)

Wolters EA, Steel BS, Weston D, Brunson M (2017) Determinants of residential Firewise behaviors in Central Oregon. The Social Science Journal 54, 168–178.
Determinants of residential Firewise behaviors in Central Oregon.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |