Register      Login
International Journal of Wildland Fire International Journal of Wildland Fire Society
Journal of the International Association of Wildland Fire
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Fire behaviour in masticated forest fuels: lab and prescribed fire experiments

Zachary D. Lyon A C , Penelope Morgan A D , Camille S. Stevens-Rumann A B , Aaron M. Sparks A , Robert F. Keefe A and Alistair M. S. Smith A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Forest, Rangeland, and Fire Sciences, University of Idaho, 875 Perimeter Dr. MS 1133, Moscow, ID 83844-1133, USA.

B Department of Forest and Rangeland Stewardship, Colorado State University, 1472 Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1472, USA.

C Present address: Manti-La Sal National Forest, Monticello, UT 84535, USA.

D Corresponding author. Email: pmorgan@uidaho.edu

International Journal of Wildland Fire 27(4) 280-292 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF17145
Submitted: 28 September 2017  Accepted: 11 February 2018   Published: 10 April 2018

Abstract

Managers masticate fuels to reduce extreme fire hazards, but the effect on fire behaviour within the resulting compact fuelbeds is poorly understood. We burned 54 masticated fuelbeds in laboratory experiments one and two growing seasons after mastication and 75 masticated fuelbeds in prescribed fire experiments one growing season after treatment in three replicate Pinus ponderosa stands. Mastication treatments reduced density of trees >5 cm diameter by 30–72% resulting in total fuel depth of 6.9–13.7 cm and surface woody fuel loading of 1.0–16.0 kg m−2. Flame length and rate of spread were low and similar for coarse and fine mastication treatments and controls. Smouldering combustion lasted 6–22 h in prescribed fire experiments where fuelbeds included duff and were well mixed by machinery, compared with <2 h in the laboratory where fuelbeds did not include duff and had varying fuel moisture. Fuel consumption in the prescribed fires was highly variable, ranging from 0 to 20 cm in depth and was less from 2-year-old fuelbeds than 1-year-old fuelbeds in laboratory burns. Compared with fine mastication treatments, coarse treatments took less time to implement and were more cost-effective. Although laboratory experiments expand our understanding of burning masticated fuels under controlled conditions, they did not readily translate to prescribed burning conditions where fuels, weather and ignition patterns were more variable. This highlights the need for more laboratory experiments and in situ research that together can be used to develop much-needed, scalable predictive models of mastication combustion.

Additional keywords: combustion, fire intensity, fuel: treatments, trees: conifers.


References

Bass B, Zimmerman T, Romero F, Hamrick D, Williams T, Ratzlaff J, Close K, Clark D, Mathewson T (2012) Lower North Fork prescribed fire: prescribed fire review. State of Colorado Department of Natural Resources. (Denver, CO, USA)

Battaglia MA, Rocca ME, Rhoades CC, Ryan MG (2010) Surface fuel loadings within mulching treatments in Colorado coniferous forest. Forest Ecology and Management 260, 1557–1566.
Surface fuel loadings within mulching treatments in Colorado coniferous forest.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bell CK, Keefe RF, Fried JS (2017) Validation of the OpCost logging cost model using contractor surveys. International Journal of Forest Engineering 10, 1–12.

Bowman DMJS, Williamson G, Kolden CA, Abatzoglou JT, Cochrane MA, Smith AMS (2017) Human exposure and sensitivity to globally extreme wildfire events, Nature Ecology and Evolution 1, art0058
Human exposure and sensitivity to globally extreme wildfire events, NatureCrossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Brewer NW, Smith AMS, Hatten JA, Higuera PE, Hudak AT, Ottmar RD, Tinkham WT (2013) Fuel moisture influences on fire-altered carbon in masticated fuels: an experimental study. Journal of Geophysical Research. Biogeosciences 118, 30–40.
Fuel moisture influences on fire-altered carbon in masticated fuels: an experimental study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXhtVKrsrbL&md5=a3ce430675466eac7d34f0e2385b75abCAS |

Brinker RW, Kinard J, Rummer R, Lanford B (2002) Machine rates for selected forest harvesting machines. Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station Circular 296 [revised]. (Auburn, AL, USA)

Brown JK (1974) Handbook for inventorying downed woody material. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, General Technical Report INT-16. (Ogden, UT, USA)

Busse MD, Hubbert KR, Fiddler G, Shestak CJ, Powers RF (2005) Lethal soil temperatures during burning of masticated forest residues. International Journal of Wildland Fire 14, 267–276.
Lethal soil temperatures during burning of masticated forest residues.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Collins BM, Stephens SL, Moghaddas JJ, Battles J (2009) Challenges and approaches in planning fuel treatments across fire-excluded forested landscapes. Journal of Forestry 108, 24–31.

Glitzenstein JS, Streng DR, Achtemeier GL, Naeher LP, Wade DD (2006) Fuels and fire behavior in chipped and unchipped plots: Implications for land management near the wildland/urban interface. Forest Ecology and Management 236, 18–29.
Fuels and fire behavior in chipped and unchipped plots: Implications for land management near the wildland/urban interface.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hartsough BR, Abrams S, Barbour RJ, Drews ES, McIver JD, Moghaddas JJ, Schwilk DW, Stephens SL (2008) The economics of alternative fuel reduction treatments in western United States dry forests: financial and policy implications from the national fire and fire surrogate study. Forest Policy and Economics 10, 344–354.
The economics of alternative fuel reduction treatments in western United States dry forests: financial and policy implications from the national fire and fire surrogate study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Heinsch FA, Sikkink PG, Smith HY, Retzlaff ML (2018) Characterizing fire behavior from laboratory burns of multi-aged, mixed-conifer masticated fuels in the western United States. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station (Fort Collins, CO, USA), (in press).

Hood S, Wu R (2006) Estimating fuelbed loadings in masticated areas. In ‘Fuels Management – How to Measure Success’. (Eds PL Andrews, BL Butler) USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station Proceedings RMRS-P-41, pp. 333–340. (Fort Collins, CO, USA)

Hudak AT, Rickert I, Morgan P, Strand E, Lewis SA, Robichaud PR, Hoffman C, Holden ZA (2011) Review of fuel treatment effectiveness in forests and rangelands and a case study from the 2007 megafires in central, Idaho, USA. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-252. (Fort Collins, CO, USA)

Hyde JC, Smith AMS, Ottmar RD, Alvarado EC, Morgan P (2011) The combustion of sound and rotten coarse woody debris: A review. International Journal of Wildland Fire 20, 163–174.
The combustion of sound and rotten coarse woody debris: A review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hyde JC, Smith AMS, Ottmar RD (2012) Properties affecting the consumption of sound and rotten coarse woody debris: a preliminary investigation using laboratory fires. International Journal of Wildland Fire 21, 596–608.
Properties affecting the consumption of sound and rotten coarse woody debris: a preliminary investigation using laboratory fires.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Jiménez E, Vega-Nieva D, Rey E, Fernández C, Vega JA (2016) Midterm fuel structure recovery and potential fire behaviour in a Pinus pinaster Ait. forest in northern central Spain after thinning and mastication. European Journal of Forest Research 135, 675–686.
Midterm fuel structure recovery and potential fire behaviour in a Pinus pinaster Ait. forest in northern central Spain after thinning and mastication.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Johnson EA (1992) ‘Fire and Vegetation Dynamics: Studies from the North American Boreal Forest.’ (Cambridge University Press: New York, NY, USA)

Kane JM, Knapp EE, Varner JM (2006) Variability in loading of mechanically masticated fuel beds in northern California and southwestern Oregon. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Proceedings RMRS-P-41. (Fort Collins, CO, USA)

Kane JM, Varner JM, Knapp EE (2009) Novel fuelbed characteristics associated with mechanical mastication treatments in northern California and south-west Oregon, USA. International Journal of Wildland Fire 18, 686–697.
Novel fuelbed characteristics associated with mechanical mastication treatments in northern California and south-west Oregon, USA.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Keane RE, Dickinson LJ (2007) The photoload sampling technique: estimating surface fuel loadings from downward-looking photographs of synthetic fuelbeds. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-190. (Fort Collins, CO, USA)

Keane RE, Sikkink PG, Jain TB (in press) Physical and chemical characteristics of surface fuels in masticated mixed-conifer stands of the US Rocky Mountains. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-370. (Fort Collins, CO, USA)

Keefe R, Anderson N, Hogland J, Muhlenfeld K (2014) Woody biomass logistics In ‘Cellulosic Energy Cropping Systems’. (Ed. DL Karlen) pp. 252–279. (Wiley: New York, NY, USA)

Knapp EE, Varner JM, Busse MD, Skinner CN, Shestak CJ (2011) Behavior and effects of prescribed fire in masticated fuelbeds. International Journal of Wildland Fire 20, 932–945.
Behavior and effects of prescribed fire in masticated fuelbeds.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kobziar LN, McBride JR, Stephens SL (2009) The efficacy of fire and fuels reduction treatments in a Sierra Nevada pine plantation. International Journal of Wildland Fire 18, 791–801.
The efficacy of fire and fuels reduction treatments in a Sierra Nevada pine plantation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kreye JK, Kobziar LN (2015) The effect of mastication on surface fire behaviour, fuels consumption and tree mortality in pine flatwoods of Florida, USA. International Journal of Wildland Fire 24, 573–579.
The effect of mastication on surface fire behaviour, fuels consumption and tree mortality in pine flatwoods of Florida, USA.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kreye JK, Varner JM, Knapp EE (2011) Effects of particle fracturing and moisture content on fire behaviour in masticated fuelbeds burned in a laboratory. International Journal of Wildland Fire 20, 308–317.
Effects of particle fracturing and moisture content on fire behaviour in masticated fuelbeds burned in a laboratory.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kreye JK, Kobziar LN, Zipperer WC (2013) Effects of fuel load and moisture content on fire behaviour and heating in masticated litter-dominated fuels. International Journal of Wildland Fire 22, 440–445.
Effects of fuel load and moisture content on fire behaviour and heating in masticated litter-dominated fuels.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kreye JK, Brewer NW, Morgan P, Varner JM, Smith AMS, Hoffman CM, Ottmar RD (2014) Fire behavior in masticated fuels: a review. Forest Ecology and Management 314, 193–207.
Fire behavior in masticated fuels: a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kreye JK, Varner JM, Kane JM, Knapp EE, Reed WP (2016) The impact of aging on laboratory fire behaviour in masticated shrub fuelbeds of California and Oregon, USA. International Journal of Wildland Fire 25, 1002–1008.
The impact of aging on laboratory fire behaviour in masticated shrub fuelbeds of California and Oregon, USA.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Laiho R, Prescott CE (2004) Decay and nutrient dynamics of coarse woody debris in northern coniferous forests: a synthesis. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 34, 763–777.
Decay and nutrient dynamics of coarse woody debris in northern coniferous forests: a synthesis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXlt1Cjt7s%3D&md5=8f389b2f09f367231c0a3290da8fa59bCAS |

Lobert JM, Warnatz J (1993) Emissions from the combustion process in vegetation. In ‘Fire in the Environment: the Ecological, Atmospheric, and Climatic Importance of Vegetation Fires’. (Eds P. J. Crutzen and J. G. Goldammer) pp. 15–37. (Wiley: Chichester)

Marino E, Madrigal J, Guijarro M, Hernando C, Diez C, Fernandez C (2010) Flammability descriptors of fine dead fuels resulting from two mechanical treatments in shrubland: a comparative laboratory study. International Journal of Wildland Fire 19, 314–324.
Flammability descriptors of fine dead fuels resulting from two mechanical treatments in shrubland: a comparative laboratory study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXlvFWlu7Y%3D&md5=24c54b0dfdb561f7d771f0f30ffc0d2bCAS |

Mathews DM (1942) ‘Cost Control in the Logging Industry’, 1st edn. (McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA)

McAllister S, Finney M (2016) Burning rates of wood cribs with implications for wildland fires. Fire Technology 52, 1755–1777.
Burning rates of wood cribs with implications for wildland fires.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Miyanishi K, Johnson EA (2002) Process and patterns of duff consumption in the mixed wood boreal forest. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 32, 1285–1295.
Process and patterns of duff consumption in the mixed wood boreal forest.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Miyata ES (1980) Determining fixed and operating costs of logging equipment. USDA Forest Service, North Central Research Station, General Technical Report NC-55. (St Paul, MN, USA)

Miyata ES, Steinhib HM, Winsauer SA (1981) Using work sampling to analyze logging operations. USDA Forest Service, Research Paper NC-213. (St Paul, MN, USA)

Nelson RM, Hiers JK (2008) The influence of fuelbed properties on moisture drying rates and time lags of longleaf pine litter. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 38, 2394–2404.
The influence of fuelbed properties on moisture drying rates and time lags of longleaf pine litter.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

NOAA (2014) Idaho climate division 1: Panhandle. Available at http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cag/ [Verified 2 May 2014]

R Development Core Team (2017) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing (Vienna, Austria). Available at http://www.R-project.org/

Radeloff VC, Hammer RB, Stewart SI, Fried JS, Holcomb SS, McKeefry JF (2005) The wildland–urban interface in the United States. Ecological Applications 15, 799–805.
The wildland–urban interface in the United States.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Reiner AL, Vaillant NM, Fites-Kaufman J, Dailey SN (2009) Mastication and prescribed fire impacts on fuels in a 25 year old ponderosa pine plantation, southern Sierra Nevada. Forest Ecology and Management 258, 2365–2372.
Mastication and prescribed fire impacts on fuels in a 25 year old ponderosa pine plantation, southern Sierra Nevada.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Rummer B (2008) Assessing costs of fuel reduction treatments: a critical review. Forest Policy and Economics 10, 355–362.
Assessing costs of fuel reduction treatments: a critical review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

SAS (2007) JMP Statistical analysis software. SAS Institute Inc. (Cary, NC, USA). Available at www.jmp.com

Smith AMS, Sparks AM, Kolden CA, Abatzoglou JT, Talhelm AF, Johnson DM, Boschetti L, Lutz JA, Apostol KG, Yedinak KM, Tinkham WT (2016) Towards a new paradigm in fire severity research using dose–response experiments. International Journal of Wildland Fire 25, 158–166.
Towards a new paradigm in fire severity research using dose–response experiments.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Sparks AM, Smith AMS, Talhelm AF, Kolden CA, Yedinak KM, Johnson DM (2017) Impacts of fire radiative flux on mature Pinus ponderosa growth and vulnerability to secondary mortality agents. International Journal of Wildland Fire 26, 95–106.
Impacts of fire radiative flux on mature Pinus ponderosa growth and vulnerability to secondary mortality agents.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Van Wagner CE (1971) Two solitudes in forest fire research. Canadian Forestry Service, Petawawa Forest Experiment Station, Information Report PS-X-29. (Chalk River, ON, Canada)

van Wagtendonk JW (1996) Use of a deterministic fire growth model to test fuel treatments. In ‘Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project, vol. II. Final Report to Congress. Centers for Water and Wildland Resources’. pp. 1155–1166. (University of California—Davis: Davis, CA, USA)

van Wagtendonk JW, Benedict JM, Sydoriak WM (1998) Fuelbed characteristics of Sierra Nevada conifers. Western Journal of Applied Forestry 13, 73–84.

Vitorelo B, Han H-S (2010) Establishing a standard work sampling method for mastication operations analysis. In ‘Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Council on Forest Engineering: Fueling the Future’, 6–9 June 2010, Auburn AL, USA. (Eds D. Mitchell and T. Gallagher) (COFE: Morgantown, WV, USA) Available at http://www.cofe.frec.vt.edu/documents/2010/Vitorelo_Work_Sampling_final.pdf [Verified 1 June 2017]

Vitorelo B, Han H-S, Varner JM (2009). Masticators for fuel reduction treatment: equipment options, effectiveness, costs, and environmental impacts. Proceedings of the 2006 Council on Forest Engineering (COFE) Meeting, Lake Tahoe, CA, USA. Available at http://www.cofe.frec.vt.edu/documents/2010/Vitorelo_Work_Sampling_final.pdf [Verified 1 June 2017]

Ward DE, Hardy CC (1991) Smoke emissions from wildland fires. Environment International 17, 117–134.
Smoke emissions from wildland fires.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK3MXktlCltr4%3D&md5=f1ee9283c77aacbbd4ed3772b10c67eaCAS |