Register      Login
Wildlife Research Wildlife Research Society
Ecology, management and conservation in natural and modified habitats
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > WR > WR06054
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 33(8)

Attractiveness of a novel omnivore bait, PIGOUT®, to feral pigs (Sus scrofa) and assessment of risks of bait uptake by non-target species

Brendan D. Cowled A B D , Steven J. Lapidge A B , Michelle Smith B C and Linton Staples B C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Pest Animal Control Cooperative Research Centre, GPO Box 284, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.

B Invasive Animals Cooperative Research Centre, University of Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.

C Animal Control Technologies Australia P/L, PO Box 379, Somerton, Vic. 3062, Australia.

D Corresponding author. Email: brendan.cowled@invasiveanimals.com

Wildlife Research 33(8) 651-660 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR06054
Submitted: 16 May 2006  Accepted: 25 October 2006   Published: 19 December 2006

Abstract

Following a bait-preference pilot study on captive feral pigs, a series of field studies assessed the attractiveness and target-specificity of a prototype manufactured feral pig bait (PIGOUT®). Two promising test baits and fresh meat reference baits were biomarked with iophenoxic acid and aerially distributed in 100-km2 blocks of land infested with feral pigs in western Queensland to assess field uptake and target-specificity without prefeeding. Uptake was assessed by measuring blood iodine levels in aerially shot feral pigs. In all, 80% of feral pigs sampled in a non-toxic PIGOUT®-baited area had significantly elevated blood iodine, compared with 52% of sampled feral pigs in a meat-baited area (although slightly different baiting strategies were employed). No age or sex bias was evident in PIGOUT®-consuming feral pigs. No monitored manufactured baits were consumed by non-target species in 500 bait-nights. Attractiveness and target-specificity trials of ground-laid, unfenced PIGOUT® baits compared with reference baits were subsequently undertaken in several regions of eastern Australia. Results showed that PIGOUT® was consumed readily by feral pigs at all sites, and that it offered significant improvement in target specificity when compared with unfenced wheat or meat baits. However, the baits were consumed by small numbers of macropods, birds and possums. Available evidence indicates that the target-specificity of PIGOUT® bait is highest in the rangelands, reducing slightly in temperate areas and subalpine forests, where abundance of small animals is higher.


Acknowledgments

The Queensland Department of Natural Resources and Mines Pest Animal Ethics Committee approved the pen, paddock and field studies. The University of Sydney Animal Welfare Ethics Committee approved the research in NNP, Arthursleigh and MSF. Thanks are extended to: M. Gentle and P. Elsworth, M. Derrick and J. Hampton, A. Glen, P. Mahon and B. Tamayo and the ACT Parks and Conservation Service for field assistance, and B. Parker for the blood iodine analysis. The development of PIGOUT® has been a collaboration between the Pest Animal Control Cooperative Research Centre (now Invasive Animals CRC) and Animal Control Technologies Australia P/L, supported by financial grants from Meat and Livestock Australia Ltd and the Australian Government National Feral Animal Control Program. In-kind support from the Queensland Department of Natural Resources, Environment ACT and the University of Sydney is gratefully acknowledged.


References

Choquenot, D. , and Lukins, B. (1996). Effect of pasture availability on bait uptake by feral pigs in Australia’s semi-arid rangelands. Wildlife Research 23, 421–428.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Choquenot D., McIlroy J., and Korn T. (1996). ‘Managing Vertebrate Pests: Feral Pigs.’ (Ed. M. Bomford.) (Bureau of Resource Sciences, Australian Government Publishing Service: Canberra.)

Clarke, C. M. H. , Dzieciolowski, R. M. , Batcheler, D. , and Frampton, C. M. (1992). A comparison of tooth eruption and wear and dental cementum techniques in age determination of New Zealand feral pigs. Wildlife Research 19, 769–777.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Clarke K. R., and Warwick R. M. (2001). ‘Change in Marine Communities: an Approach to Statistical Analysis and Interpretation.’ 2nd edn. (PRIMER-E Ltd: Plymouth, UK.)

Cowled, B. D. , Gifford, E. , Smith, M. , Staples, L. , and Lapidge, S. J. (2006). Efficacy of manufactured PIGOUT® baits for localised control of feral pigs in the semi-arid Queensland rangelands. Wildlife Research 33, 427–437.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Hone J., and Pedersen H. (1980). Changes in a feral pig population after poisoning. In ‘Proceedings of the 9th Vertebrate Pest Conference’. (Ed. J. P. Clark.) pp 176–182. (University of California: Davis, CA.)

Hunt R. (1998). Review of environmental factors in pig control program utilising warfarin. Brindabella National Park, Bimberi Nature Reserve and Scabby Range Nature Reserve. New South Wales National Parks and Wildlife Service.

Martin, G. R. , and Twigg, L. E. (2002). Sensitivity to sodium fluroacetate (1080) of native animals from north-western Australia. Wildlife Research 29, 75–83.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | McIlroy J. C. (1993). Feral pig management problems in the wet tropics of Queensland World Heritage Area. Final consultancy report to the Wet Tropics Management Agency, Cairns, Australia.

McIlroy, J. C. , Braysher, M. , and Saunders, G. R. (1989). Effectiveness of a warfarin-poisoning campaign against feral pigs, Sus scrofa, in Namadgi National park, Australian Capital Territory. Australian Wildlife Research 16, 195–202.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | O’Brien P. (1986). An approach to the design of target-specific vertebrate pest control systems. In ‘Proceedings of the 12th Vertebrate Pest Conference, USA’. (Ed. T. P. Salmon.) pp. 247–252. (University of California: Davis, CA.)

O’Brien, P. H. , Kleba, R. E. , Beck, J. A. , and Baker, P. J. (2000). Vomiting by feral pigs after 1080 intoxication: non-target hazard and influence of anti-emetics. Wildlife Society Bulletin 14, 425–432.
O’Donovan V. (2002). Warfarin pig baiting program (Kosciuszko National Park). Review of Environmental Factors. NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service, unpublished report, Sydney.

Parker B. (2004). Blood samples for IPA analysis. Laboratory report PMC 04/016. Alan Fletcher Research Station, Sherwood, Qld.

Saunders, G. , Kay, B. , and Nicol, H. (1993). Factors affecting bait uptake and trapping success for feral pigs (Sus scrofa) in Kosciusko National Park. Wildlife Research 20, 653–665.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Spencer, P. B. S. , Lapidge, S. J. , Hampton, J. O. , and Pluske, J. R. (2005). The sociogenetic structure of a controlled feral pig population. Wildlife Research 32, 297–304.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Twigg, E. L. , Lowe, T. , Martin, G. , and Everett, M. (2005). Feral pigs in north-western Australia: basic biology, bait consumption, and the efficacy of 1080 baits. Wildlife Research 32, 281–296.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |