Wildlife Research Wildlife Research Society
Ecology, management and conservation in natural and modified habitats
RESEARCH ARTICLE

How hot do nest boxes get in the tropics? A study of nest boxes for the endangered mahogany glider

J. L. Isaac A C , M. Parsons B and B. A. Goodman A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Centre for Tropical Biodiversity and Climate Change, School of Marine and Tropical Biology, James Cook University, Townsville, Qld 4811, Australia.

B Queensland Parks and Wildlife Service, Savannah Section, Ripple Creek, PO Box 1293, Ingham, Qld 4850, Australia.

C Corresponding author: Email: joanne.isaac@jcu.edu.au

Wildlife Research 35(5) 441-445 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR08016
Submitted: 1 February 2008  Accepted: 13 May 2008   Published: 19 August 2008

Abstract

As hollow-bearing trees become scarcer due to habitat loss, the use of nest boxes as a management tool for hollow-dependent species is likely to increase. However, nest-box use can be variable among species and habitats, and one possible reason may be that nest boxes offer little protection against extreme temperatures compared with natural hollows; this may be particularly important in the tropics. Here, we measured the microclimate of 16 nest boxes, installed as part of a recovery program for an endangered arboreal marsupial, the mahogany glider, during the summer in tropical north Queensland. We also measured the microclimate of 14 naturally occurring refuges (hollows in standing and fallen trees) at the same study sites. Nest boxes were significantly hotter during the day than were natural refuges (either in fallen or standing live trees) and experienced a greater range of temperatures. The most important factors explaining variation in daytime temperature in boxes was box aspect and the amount of canopy cover directly above the box: boxes that faced north, and those with greater canopy cover, were up to 7°C cooler than those that faced south or had little cover. We discuss our results in relation to the use of nest boxes in management plans for arboreal marsupials in the tropics.


Acknowledgements

JLI is supported by a James Cook University (JCU) Research Advancement Grant and this study was funded by a JCU New Staff Grant. Thanks to Yvette and Steve Williams for help, advice and support. Rob Gegg and Sue Riley provided technical support and Health & Safety advice. The study was supported by the Queensland Glider Network and boxes were made and provided by Stacey and Alan Franks of Hollow Log Homes; we thank them for their hard work in designing, making and promoting sustainable nest boxes for the conservation of Australian wildlife. We also thank Daryl and Geoff Dickson for advice and the location of a known glider den, and for their work rehabilitating injured mahogany gliders and other native mammals. The comments and suggestions of R. Goldingay and two anonymous referees greatly improved earlier versions of the manuscript.


References

Akaike H. (1973). Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In ‘Second International Symposium on Information Theory’. (Eds B. N. Petrov and F. Csaki.) pp. 267–281. (Akademiai Kiado: Budapest.)

Akaike H. (1985). Prediction and entropy. In ‘A Celebration of Statistics’. (Eds A. Atkinson and S. E. Fiensberg.) pp. 1–24. (Springer-Verlag: New York.)

Ardia, D. R. , Perez, J. H. , and Clotfelter, E. D. (2006). Nest box orientation affects internal temperature and nest site selection by tree swallows. Journal of Field Ornithology 77, 339–344.
CrossRef |

Beyer, G. L. , and Goldingay, R. L. (2006). The value of nest boxes in the research and management of Australian hollow-using arboreal marsupials. Wildlife Research 33, 161–174.
CrossRef |

Calder T. G., Golding B. G., and Manderson A. D. (1983). Management for arboreal species in the Wombat State Forest. Environment Report No. 16. Graduate School of Environmental Science, Monash University.

Gibbons, P. , Lindenmayer, D. B. , Barry, S. C. , and Tanton, M. T. (2002). Hollow selection by vertebrate fauna in forests of southeastern Australia and implications for forest management. Biological Conservation 103, 1–12.
CrossRef |

Harley D. K. P. (2004). Patterns of nest box use by Leadbeater’s possum (Gymnobelideus leadbeateri): applications to research and conservation. In ‘The Biology of Australian Possums and Gliders’. (Eds R. L. Goldingay and S. M. Jackson.) pp. 318–329. (Surrey Beatty: Sydney.)

Harley, D. K. P. (2006). A role for nest boxes in the conservation of Leadbeater’s possum (Gymnobelidius leadbeateri). Wildlife Research 33, 385–395.
CrossRef |

Harper, M. J. , McCarthy, M. A. , and van der Ree, R. (2005). The use of nest boxes in urban natural vegetation remnants by vertebrate fauna. Wildlife Research 32, 509–516.
CrossRef |

International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN) (2007). ‘IUCN Red List of Threatened Species.’ (IUCN: Gland, Switzerland.)

Inter-governmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2007). ‘Fourth Assessment Report.’ (IPCC: Geneva.)

Irvine, R. , and Bender, R. (1997). Introduction of the sugar glider Petaurus breviceps into re-established forest of the Organ Pipes National Park, Victoria. Victorian Naturalist 114, 230–239.


Isaac, J. L. , DeGabriel, J. L. , and Goodman, B. A. (2008). Microclimate of daytime den sites in a tropical possum: implications for the conservation of tropical arboreal marsupials. Animal Conservation ,
CrossRef |

Jackson S. M. (1998). Foraging ecology, behaviour and management of the mahogany glider Petaurus gracilis. Ph.D. Thesis, James Cook University, Townsville.

Jackson, S. M. (2000). Home range and den use of the mahogany glider, Petaurus gracilis. Wildlife Research 27, 49–60.
CrossRef |

Lindenmayer, D. B. , Cunningham, R. B. , Tanton, M. T. , Smith, A. P. , and Nix, H. A. (1990). The conservation of marsupials in the montane ash forests of the central highlands of Victoria, southeast Australia: I. Factors influencing the occupancy of trees with hollows. Biological Conservation 54, 111–131.
CrossRef |

Lindenmayer, D. B. , MacGregor, C. , and Gibbons, P. (2002). Comment – Economics of a nest-box program for the conservation of an endangered species: a re-appraisal. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 32, 2244–2247.
CrossRef |

Lindenmayer, D. B. , MacGregor, C. I. , Cunningham, R. B. , Incoll, R. D. , Crane, M. , Rawlins, D. , and Michael, D. R. (2003). The use of nest boxes by arboreal marsupials in the forests of the central highlands of Victoria. Wildlife Research 30, 259–264.
CrossRef |

McComb, W. C. , and Noble, R. E. (1981). Microclimates of nest boxes and natural cavities in bottomland hardwoods. Journal of Wildlife Management 45, 284–289.
CrossRef |

McDonald R. C., Isbell R. F., Speight J. G., Walker J., and Hopkins M. S. (1990). ‘Australian Soil and Land Survey Field Handbook.’ 2nd edn. (Inkata Press.)

Menkhorst P. W. (1984a). The application of nest boxes in research and management of possums and gliders. In ‘Possums and Gliders’. (Eds A. P. Smith and I. D. Hume.) pp. 517–525. (Australian Mammal Society: Sydney.)

Menkhorst, P. W. (1984b). Use of nest boxes by forest vertebrates in Gippsland: acceptance, preference and demand. Australian Wildlife Research 11, 255–264.
CrossRef |

Narum, S. R. (2006). Beyond Bonferroni: less conservative analyses for conservation genetics. Conservation Genetics 7, 783–787.
CrossRef |

Sedgeley, J. A. (2001). Quality of cavity microclimate as a factor influencing selection of maternity roosts by a tree-dwelling bat, Chalinolobus tuberculatus, in New Zealand. Journal of Applied Ecology 38, 425–438.
CrossRef |



Rent Article (via Deepdyve) Export Citation Cited By (14)