Register      Login
Wildlife Research Wildlife Research Society
Ecology, management and conservation in natural and modified habitats
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Effect of pre-feeding and sodium fluoroacetate (1080) concentration on bait acceptance by house mice

P. Fisher A B , A. Airey A and S. Brown A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Landcare Research, PO Box 40, Lincoln 7640, New Zealand.

B Corresponding author. Email: fisherp@landcareresearch.co.nz

Wildlife Research 36(7) 627-636 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR09082
Submitted: 24 June 2009  Accepted: 8 September 2009   Published: 28 October 2009

Abstract

Context. In New Zealand, the aerial application of toxic baits containing sodium fluoroacetate (1080) can consistently achieve significant reductions in populations of multiple vertebrate pest species including brushtail possums (Trichosurus vulpecula), ship rats (Rattus rattus) and stoats (Mustela erminea). Reductions in house mouse (Mus musculus) populations by 1080 baiting appear less consistent, possibly due to low acceptance of 1080 bait by mice in field conditions.

Aims. We tested the effect of pre-feeding and 1080 concentration on the acceptance of pellet food by mice.

Methods. Wild-caught mice were individually housed and presented with a series of two-choice laboratory feeding tests, using estimates of the daily amount eaten to indicate relative acceptance of different types of pellet food.

Key results. Pre-feeding mice on non-toxic food did not increase their subsequent acceptance of the same food containing 0.15% 1080. Mice showed low acceptance of food containing 0.08 and 0.15% 1080 (by weight), with similar mortality (25%). Acceptance of food containing 1.5% 1080 was also very low in comparison with non-toxic food, although mortality in mice was higher (~66%). In comparison with other concentrations, mice ate comparatively more of food containing 0.001% 1080 with no mortality, although the non-toxic food was still significantly favoured. Presentation of a choice between non-toxic food and food containing 0.08, 0.15 or 1.5% 1080 to mice was followed by a significant decrease in average total daily food intake over the following 2 days. In surviving mice this ‘drop feed’ effect was followed by an increase in average daily intake of non-toxic food over the next 3 days until normal daily intake levels were again reached.

Conclusions. We suggest that wild mice can rapidly identify food containing 1080 and subsequently will avoid it.

Implications. This feeding response partly explains the variable success of 1080 baiting operations against wild mouse populations (M. musculus) in New Zealand.


Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the Foundation for Research, Science and Technology (Contract C09X0507 Multispecies Pest Control) and the Department of Conservation (Science Investigation No. 3899). Trials were conducted under approval by the Landcare Research Animal Ethics Committee (Project No. 06/06/01 for pre-feeding and 0.08% and 0.001% 1080 trial and Project No. 07/10/03 for the 1.5% 1080 trial). We thank Landcare Research staff Julie Turner, Grant Morriss, Karen Washbourne, Ryan Moffat and Jane Arrow for care of the mice and assistance with the trials, Les Brown and Matt Campion for pellet bait manufacture and laboratory testing, Guy Forrester for statistical advice and Christine Bezar for editing. Phil Cowan and two anonymous referees provided valuable feedback that improved earlier drafts of the manuscript.


References

Choquenot, D. , and Ruscoe, W. A. (2000). Mouse population eruptions in New Zealand forests: the role of population density and seedfall. Journal of Animal Ecology 69, 1058–1070.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Clapperton B. K. (2006). A review of the current knowledge of rodent behaviour in relation to control devices. Science for Conservation (Wellington) 263. NZ Department of Conservation, Wellington.

Cuthbert, R. , and Hilton, G. (2004). Introduced house mice Mus musculus: a significant predator of threatened and endemic birds on Gough Island, South Atlantic Ocean? Biological Conservation 117, 483–489.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Eason C. T. , and Wickstrom M. (2001).Vertebrate pesticide toxicology manual (poisons). Department of Conservation Technical Series 23. NZ Department of Conservation, Wellington.

Emlen, J. T. , and Strecker, R. L. (1951). The effect of laboratory confinement on survival of poisoned house mice. Ecology 32, 331–332.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Fairchild E. J. ed. (1977). ‘Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances. Vol. II.’ (US Department of Health, Education and Welfare, NIOSH: Cincinnati.)

Galef, B. G. (1986). Social identification of toxic diets by Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus). Journal of Comparative Psychology 100, 331–334.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | Genstat Committee (2002). ‘Genstat Release 6.1 Reference Manual, Parts 1–3.’ (VSN International: Oxford.)

Gillies C. A. (2002). Managing rodents on the New Zealand mainland – what options are currently available? Summary of a workshop session at the Department of Conservation ‘Mainland Island’ hui, Omapere, 20–23 August 2001. Department of Conservation Science Internal Series 47. NZ Department of Conservation, Wellington.

Hatcher, R. A. , and Weiss, S. (1923). Studies on vomiting. The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics 22, 139–193.
CAS | Invasive Species Specialist Group (2006). ISSG Global Invasive Species Database. Available at http://www.issg.org/database/species/ecology.asp?si=97&fr=1&sts=sss&lang=EN [Verified 21 October 2008].

Kononen, D. W. , Hochstein, J. R. , and Ringer, R. K. (1991). Mallard and Northern Bobwhite exposure to compound 1080: acute toxicity and food avoidance behaviour. Chemosphere 22, 655–663.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | McFadden I. , and Towns D. (1991). Eradication campaigns against kiore (Rattus exulans) on Rurima Rocks and Korapki Island, northern New Zealand. DOC Science and Research Internal Report 97. NZ Department of Conservation, Wellington.

McIlroy, J. C. (1982). The sensitivity of Australian animals to 1080 poison. IV. Native and introduced rodents. Australian Wildlife Research 9, 505–517.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | Morriss G. A. , O’Connor C. E. , Airey A. T. , and Fisher P. (2008). Factors influencing the acceptance and efficacy of toxic baits in ship rats, Norway rats and house mice. Science for Conservation (Wellington) 282. NZ Department of Conservation, Wellington.

Nachman, M. , and Hartley, P. (1975). Role of illness in producing learned taste aversion in rats: a comparison of several rodenticides. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 89, 1010–1018.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | O’Connor C. , Morriss G. , and Murphy E. (2005). Toxic bait avoidance by mice. In ‘Proceedings of the 13th Australasian Vertebrate Pest Conference’. pp. 102–105. (Landcare Research: Lincoln, NZ.)

Oliver, A. J. , and King, D. R. (1983). The influence of ambient temperatures on the susceptibility of mice, guinea-pigs and possums to compound 1080. Australian Wildlife Research 10, 297–301.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Pattison F. L. M. (1959). Toxic aliphatic fluorine compounds. In ‘Elsevier Monographs, Industrial Toxic Agents’. (Ed. E. Browning.) p. 213. (Elsevier: London.)

Rammell C. G. , and Fleming P. A. (1978). ‘Compound 1080: Properties and Uses of Sodium Monofluoroacetate in New Zealand.’ (Animal Health Division, NZ Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries: Wellington.)

Robbins, R. J. (1978). Poison-based taste aversion learning in deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus bairdi). Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 92, 642–650.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | Robbins R. J. (1980). Taste aversion learning and its implications for rodent control. In ‘Proceedings of the 9th Vertebrate Pest Conference’. (Eds J. P. Clark and R. E. Marsh.) pp. 114–121. (University of California: Davis, CA.)

Rowe, F. P. (1973). Aspects of mouse behaviour related to control. Mammal Review 3, 58–63.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Ruscoe W. A. , and Murphy E. C. (2005). House mouse. In ‘The Handbook of New Zealand Mammals’. (Ed. C. M. King.) pp. 225–245. (Oxford University Press: Melbourne.)

Ruscoe W. A. , Choquenot D. , Heyward R. , Yockney I. , Young N. , and Drew K. (2003). Seed production, predators and house mouse population eruptions in New Zealand beech forests. In ‘Rats, Mice and People: Rodent Biology and Management’. ACIAR Monograph No. 96. (Eds G. R. Singleton, L. A. Hinds, C. J. Krebs, and D. M. Spratt.) pp. 334–337. (Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research: Canberra.)

Sinclair, R. G. , and Bird, P. L. (1984). The reaction of Sminthopsis crassicaudata to meat baits containing 1080: implications for assessing risk to non-target species. Australian Wildlife Research 11, 501–507.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Sweetapple P. J. , Nugent G. , Poutu N. , and Horton P. (2006). Effect of reduced possum density on rodent and stoat abundance in podocarp-hardwood forests. DOC Research & Development Series 231. NZ Department of Conservation, Wellington.

Wanless, R. M. , Angel, A. , Cuthbert, R. J. , Hilton, G. M. , and Ryan, P. G. (2007). Can predation by invasive mice drive seabird extinctions? Biology Letters 3, 241–244.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | Wedding C. J. (2007). Aspects of the impacts of mouse (Mus musculus) control on skinks in Auckland, New Zealand. Masters Thesis, Massey University, Auckland, New Zealand.

Witmer G. , and Jojola S. (2006). What’s up with house mice? A review. In ‘Proceedings of the 22nd Vertebrate Pest Conference’. (Eds R. M. Timm, and J. M. O’Brien.) pp. 124–130. (University of California: Davis, CA.)