Register      Login
Wildlife Research Wildlife Research Society
Ecology, management and conservation in natural and modified habitats
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Wildlife tracking technology options and cost considerations

Bindi Thomas A B , John D. Holland A and Edward O. Minot A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Institute of Natural Resources, Massey University, Private Bag 11-222, Palmerston North, New Zealand.

B Corresponding author. Email: bindi@bindithomas.com

Wildlife Research 38(8) 653-663 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR10211
Submitted: 19 November 2010  Accepted: 5 September 2011   Published: 23 November 2011

Abstract

Context: Continued demand for long-distance remote wildlife tracking has resulted in the development of a variety of satellite tracking technologies. Choosing an appropriate satellite tracking system for a project involves financial, technical and operational tradeoffs associated with different systems.

Aim: The aim of the present research was to assess the technology options and associated costs to help wildlife researchers select the best tracking solution for their needs.

Methods: A technology-choice decision guide was developed to assist wildlife scientists select an optimal tracking technology. We undertook four satellite tracking case studies involving avian, aquatic and terrestrial species living in diverse environments around the world and use these case studies to validate and test the technology-choice decision guide and to calculate the cost effectiveness of alternative tracking methods. Technologies used in marine tracking were out of the scope of the present paper.

Key results: Choosing the tracking method best suited for a project requires (1) clearly specifying the data required to meet project objectives, (2) understanding the constraints imposed by the study species and its environment, and (3) calculating the net cost per datum of the various tracking methods available.

Key conclusions: We suggest that, in most circumstances, global positioning system (GPS) tracking is preferable to other options. However, where weight and environmental limitations prevent the use of GPS, alternatives such as Argos satellite Doppler-based positions (Argos) or very high frequency (VHF) can function adequately.

Implications: The present paper provides simplified criteria for selecting the best wildlife satellite tracking technology for different situations.


References

Aebischer, N. J., Robertson, P. A., and Kenward, R. E. (1993). Compositional analysis of habitat use from animal radio-tracking data. Ecology 74, 1313–1325.
Compositional analysis of habitat use from animal radio-tracking data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bradshaw, C. J. A., Sims, D. W., and Hays, G. C. (2007). Measurement error causes scale-dependent threshold erosion of biological signals in animal movement data. Ecological Applications 17, 628–638.
Measurement error causes scale-dependent threshold erosion of biological signals in animal movement data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cagnacci, F., Boitani, L., Powell, R. A., and Boyce, M. S. (2010). Animal ecology meets GPS-based radiotelemetry: a perfect storm of opportunities and challenges. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal SocIety. B. Biological Sciences 365, 2157–2162.
Animal ecology meets GPS-based radiotelemetry: a perfect storm of opportunities and challenges.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cargnelutti, B., Coulon, A., Hewison, A. J. M., Goulard, M., Angibault, J. M., and Morellet, N. (2007). Testing global positioning system performance for wildlife monitoring using mobile collars and known reference points. The Journal of Wildlife Management 71, 1380–1387.
Testing global positioning system performance for wildlife monitoring using mobile collars and known reference points.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cochran, W. W., and Lord Rexford, T. (1963). A radio-tracking system for wild animals. The Journal of Wildlife Management 27, 9–24.
A radio-tracking system for wild animals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cohn, J. P. (1999). Tracking wildlife: high-tech devices help biologists trace the movements of animals through sky and sea. Bioscience 49, 12–17.
Tracking wildlife: high-tech devices help biologists trace the movements of animals through sky and sea.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cooke, S. J., Hinch, S. G., Wikelski, M., Andrews, R. D., Kuchel, L. J., Wolcott, T. G., and Butler, P. J. (2004). Biotelemetry: a mechanistic approach to ecology. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 19, 334–343.
Biotelemetry: a mechanistic approach to ecology.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Craighead, J. J., Craighead, F. C., Varney, J. R., and Cote, C. E. (1971). Satellite monitoring of black bear. Bioscience 21, 1206–1212.
Satellite monitoring of black bear.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Dodd, N. L., Gagnon, J. W., Boe, S., and Schweinsburg, R. E. (2007). Assessment of elk highway permeability by using global positioning system telemetry. The Journal of Wildlife Management 71, 1107–1117.
Assessment of elk highway permeability by using global positioning system telemetry.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Dubinin, M., Lushchekina, A., and Radeloff, V. (2010). Performance and accuracy of Argos transmitters for wildlife monitoring in southern Russia. European Journal of Wildlife Research 56, 459–463.
Performance and accuracy of Argos transmitters for wildlife monitoring in southern Russia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Frair, J. L., Fieberg, J., Hebblewhite, M., Cagnacci, F., DeCesare, N. J., and Pedrotti, L. (2010). Resolving issues of imprecise and habitat-biased locations in ecological analyses using GPS telemetry data. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society. B. Biological Sciences 365, 2187–2200.
Resolving issues of imprecise and habitat-biased locations in ecological analyses using GPS telemetry data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Franco, A. M. A., Palmeirim, J. M., and Sutherland, W. J. (2007). A method for comparing effectiveness of research techniques in conservation and applied ecology. Biological Conservation 134, 96–105.
A method for comparing effectiveness of research techniques in conservation and applied ecology.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Girard, I., Dussault, C., Ouellet, J.-P., Courtois, R., and Caron, A. (2006). Balancing number of locations with number of individuals in telemetry studies. The Journal of Wildlife Management 70, 1249–1256.
Balancing number of locations with number of individuals in telemetry studies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hays, G. C., Akesson, S., Godley, B. J., Luschi, P., and Santidrian, P. (2001). The implications of location accuracy for the interpretation of satellite-tracking data. Animal Behaviour 61, 1035–1040.
The implications of location accuracy for the interpretation of satellite-tracking data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hebblewhite, M., and Haydon, D. T. (2010). Distinguishing technology from biology: a critical review of the use of GPS telemetry data in ecology. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society. B. Biological Sciences 365, 2303–2312.
Distinguishing technology from biology: a critical review of the use of GPS telemetry data in ecology.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Juang, P., Oki, H., Wang, Y., Martonosi, M., Peh, L., and Rubenstein, D. (2002) Energy efficient computing for wildlife tracking: design tradeoffs and early experiences with ZebraNet. In ‘Tenth International Conference on Architectual Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems (ASPLOS-X), San Jose, CA, 2002’.

Kenward, R. E. (2001) ‘A Manual for Wildlife Radio Tagging.’ (Academic Press: London.)

Lindberg, M. S., and Walker, J. (2007). Satellite telemetry in avian research and management: sample size considerations. The Journal of Wildlife Management 71, 1002–1009.
Satellite telemetry in avian research and management: sample size considerations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lizcano, D. J., and Cavelier, J. (2004). Using GPS collars to study mountain tapirs (Tapirus pinchaque) in the central Andes of Colombia. The Newsletter of the IUCN/SSC Tapir Specialist Group 13/2, 18–23.

Mourao, G., and Medri, I. M. (2002). A new way of using inexpensive large-scale assembled GPS to monitor giant anteaters in short time intervals. Wildlife Society Bulletin 30, 1029–1032.

Naef-Daenzer, B., Fruh, D., Stalder, M., Wetli, P., and Weise, E. (2005). Miniaturization (0.2 g) and evaluation of attachment techniques of telemetry transmitters. The Journal of Experimental Biology 208, 4063–4068.
Miniaturization (0.2 g) and evaluation of attachment techniques of telemetry transmitters.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2Mrms1Wrsw%3D%3D&md5=5461b2bbf30b2f13d298822d9cd81cbcCAS |

Phillips, R. A., Silk, J. R. D., Croxall, J. P., Afanasyev, V., and Briggs, D. R. (2004). Accuracy of geolocation estimates for flying seabirds. Marine Ecology Progress Series 266, 265–272.
Accuracy of geolocation estimates for flying seabirds.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Read, M. A., Grigg, G. C., Irwin, S. R., Shanahan, D., and Franklin, C. E. (2007). Satellite tracking reveals long distance coastal travel and homing by translocated Estuarine Crocodiles, Crocodylus porosus. PLoS ONE 2, e949.
Satellite tracking reveals long distance coastal travel and homing by translocated Estuarine Crocodiles, Crocodylus porosus.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Rodgers, A. R., Rempel, R. S., and Abraham, K. S. (1996). A GPS based telemetry system. Wildlife Society Bulletin 24, 559–566.

Schwartz, C. C., Podruzny, S., Cain, S. L., and Cherry, S. (2009). Performance of spread spectrum global positioning system collars on grizzly and black bears. The Journal of Wildlife Management 73, 1174–1183.
Performance of spread spectrum global positioning system collars on grizzly and black bears.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Shaffer, S. A., Tremblay, Y., Awkerman, J. A., Henry, R. W., Teo, S. L. H., Anderson, D. J., Croll, D. A., Block, B. A., and Costa, D. P. (2005). Comparison of light- and SST-based geolocation with satellite telemetry in free-ranging albatrosses. Marine Biology 147, 833–843.
Comparison of light- and SST-based geolocation with satellite telemetry in free-ranging albatrosses.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Thomas, B., Holland, J. D., and Minot, E. O. (2008). Elephant (Loxodonta africana) home ranges in Sabi Sand Reserve and Kruger National Park: a five-year satellite tracking study. PLoS ONE 3, e3902.
Elephant (Loxodonta africana) home ranges in Sabi Sand Reserve and Kruger National Park: a five-year satellite tracking study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Thomas, B., Holland, J. D., and Minot, E. O. (2010a). Home range and movement patterns of an estuarine crocodile Crocodylus porosus: a satellite tracking pilot study. Northern Territory Naturalist 22, 60–74.

Thomas, B., Minot, E. O., and Holland, J. D. (2010b). Fledging behaviour of juvenile northern royal albatrosses (Diomedea sanfordi): a GPS tracking study. Notornis 57, 135–147.

Thomas, B., Minot, E. O., and Holland, J. D. (2010c). Home range and habitat use of the New Zealand falcon (Falco novaeseelandiae) within a plantation forest: a satellite tracking study. International Journal of Ecology 2010, 829702.

Thomas, B., Holland, J. D., and Minot, E. O. (2011). Seasonal home ranges of elephants (Loxodonta africana) and their movements between Sabi Sand Reserve and Kruger National Park. African Journal of Ecology , .

Tomkiewicz, S. M., Fuller, M. R., Kie, J. G., and Bates, K. K. (2010). Global positioning system and associated technologies in animal behaviour and ecological research. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society. B. Biological Sciences 365, 2163–2176.
Global positioning system and associated technologies in animal behaviour and ecological research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Webster, M. S., Marra, P. P., Haig, S. M., Bensch, S., and Holmes, R. T. (2002). Links between worlds: unraveling migratory connectivity. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 17, 76–83.
Links between worlds: unraveling migratory connectivity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Witt, M. J., Åkesson, S., Brodericka, A. C., Coynea, M. S., Ellickd, C. J., Formiae, A., Haysf, G. C., Luschig, P., Stroudh, S., and Godley, B. J. (2010). Assessing accuracy and utility of satellite-tracking data using Argos-linked Fastloc-GPS. Animal Behaviour 80, 571–581.
Assessing accuracy and utility of satellite-tracking data using Argos-linked Fastloc-GPS.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Zimmerman, J. W., and Powell, R. A. (1995). Radiotelemetry error: location error method compared with error polygons and confidence ellipses. Canadian Journal of Ecology 73, 1123–1133.

Zucco, C. A., and Mourao, G. (2009). Low-cost global positioning system harness for pampas deer. The Journal of Wildlife Management 73, 452–457.
Low-cost global positioning system harness for pampas deer.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |