Register      Login
Australian Journal of Zoology Australian Journal of Zoology Society
Evolutionary, molecular and comparative zoology
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Novel use for a predator scent: preliminary data suggest that wombats avoid recolonising collapsed burrows following application of dingo scent

Elisa E. Sparrow A D , Michael H. Parsons B and Daniel T. Blumstein C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Zoos South Australia, Adelaide Zoo, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.

B Department of Biology, Hofstra University, Hempstead, NY 10031, USA.

C Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.

D Corresponding author. Email: elisa.sparrow@sa.gov.au

Australian Journal of Zoology 64(3) 192-197 https://doi.org/10.1071/ZO15068
Submitted: 20 February 2015  Accepted: 27 July 2016   Published: 23 August 2016

Abstract

Southern hairy-nosed wombats (Lasiorhinus latifrons) are fossorial marsupials that live in large burrow systems where their digging behaviour brings them into conflict with agriculture. In the absence of any available control options, non-selective culling is the primary mode of wombat management. This approach is contentious and has unknown implications for long-term wombat conservation. Predator scents, however, have been effective in altering behaviours of some herbivores and may offer a non-lethal alternative to culling if they discourage wombats from burrowing in perceived problem areas. Therefore, we trialled two dingo scents (faeces, urine) over 75 days to determine whether these scents would deter wombats from repopulating collapsed burrows. Ten inhabited single-entrance burrows were excavated over three days (to allow time for inhabitants to exit), collapsed and then filled in. Five burrows, separated by at least 200 m, were used for dingo scent treatments (three urine; two faeces) and three burrows, separated by the same distance, served as negative controls (unscented), along with two ‘farmer-monitored’ active controls (dog urine and a dingo carcass). We used a rank-sum score to assess wombat activity: scratching was scored with a value of (1), digging (2), and recolonisation (5), with each value reflecting total energy and time spent in the vicinity of the treatment. We fitted Generalised Estimating Equations (repeated-measures, Fisher Method) to explain variation within, and across, treatment and control burrows. Within 20 days, all 10 sites had signs of wombat activity that ranged from fresh digging, to fully functional burrows. Among the five treatment sites, scratching and tracks identified wombats as being present, but they did not dig. After 75 days, the five sites treated with dingo scents had minimal activity and no new burrows, while wombats recolonised all control burrows. Though we used only 10 burrows for this preliminary study, our findings suggest the need for further testing of dingo scents as a tool for dissuading wombats from digging and recolonisation of collapsed burrows. This represents a novel use for a predator scent, in that prey may remain in the vicinity near the deterrent, but curb problematic behaviours of economic consequence.

Additional keywords: abundant species management, Canis dingo, human–wildlife conflict, kairomones, Lasiorhinus latifrons, non-invasive deterrents, predator urine, southern hairy-nosed wombat.


References

Apfelbach, R., Blanchard, C. D., Blanchard, R. J., Hayes, R. A., and McGregor, I. S. (2005). The effects of predator odors in mammalian prey species: a review of field and laboratory studies. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 29, 1123–1144.
The effects of predator odors in mammalian prey species: a review of field and laboratory studies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16085312PubMed |

Apfelbach, R., Parsons, M. H., Soini, H. A., and Novotny, M. V. (2015). Are single odorous components of a predator sufficient to elicit defensive behaviors in prey species? Frontiers in Neuroscience 9, 263.
Are single odorous components of a predator sufficient to elicit defensive behaviors in prey species?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 26283903PubMed |

Bennett, S. L., Litster, A., Weng, H. Y., Walker, S. L., and Luescher, A. U. (2012). Investigating behavior assessment instruments to predict aggression in dogs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 141, 139–148.
Investigating behavior assessment instruments to predict aggression in dogs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Borchard, P., and Wright, I. A. (2010). Bulldozers and blueberries: managing fence damage by bare-nosed wombats at the agricultural–riparian interface. Human–Wildlife Interactions 4, 247–256.

Bytheway, J. P., Carthey, A. J., and Banks, P. B. (2013). Risk vs. reward: how predators and prey respond to aging olfactory cues. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 67, 715–725.
Risk vs. reward: how predators and prey respond to aging olfactory cues.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Carthey, A. J. R., and Banks, P. B. (2012). When does an alien become a native species? A vulnerable native mammal recognizes and responds to its long-term alien predator. PLoS One 7, e31804.
When does an alien become a native species? A vulnerable native mammal recognizes and responds to its long-term alien predator.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38XjtF2qu7c%3D&md5=0b429a642fa30da8536929feb3f4351eCAS |

Carthey, A. J. R., and Banks, P. B. (2016). Naiveté is not forever: responses of a vulnerable native rodent to its long term alien predators. Oikos 125, 918–926.
Naiveté is not forever: responses of a vulnerable native rodent to its long term alien predators.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cox, T. E., Murray, P. J., Hall, G. P., and Li, X. (2010). Pest responses to odors from predators fed a diet of target species conspecifics and heterospecifics. Journal of Wildlife Management 74, 1737–1744.
Pest responses to odors from predators fed a diet of target species conspecifics and heterospecifics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Crowther, M. S., Fillios, M., Colman, N., and Letnic, M. (2014). An updated description of the Australian dingo (Canis dingo Meyer, 1793). Journal of Zoology 293, 192–203.
An updated description of the Australian dingo (Canis dingo Meyer, 1793).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Descovich, K. A., Lisle, A. T., Johnston, S., Nicolson, V., and Phillips, C. J. C. (2012). Differential responses of captive southern hairy-nosed wombats (Lasiorhinus latifrons) to the presence of faeces from different species and male and female conspecifics. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 138, 110–117.
Differential responses of captive southern hairy-nosed wombats (Lasiorhinus latifrons) to the presence of faeces from different species and male and female conspecifics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ferrari, M. C., Messier, F., and Chivers, D. P. (2007). Degradation of chemical alarm cues under natural conditions: risk assessment by larval woodfrogs. Chemoecology 17, 263–266.
Degradation of chemical alarm cues under natural conditions: risk assessment by larval woodfrogs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Finlayson, G. R., Shimmin, G. A., Temple‐Smith, P. D., Handasyde, K. A., and Taggart, D. A. (2005). Burrow use and ranging behaviour of the southern hairy‐nosed wombat (Lasiorhinus latifrons) in the Murraylands, South Australia. Journal of Zoology 265, 189–200.
Burrow use and ranging behaviour of the southern hairy‐nosed wombat (Lasiorhinus latifrons) in the Murraylands, South Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hegab, I. M., Jin, Y., Ye, M., Wang, A., Yin, B., Yang, S., and Wei, W. (2014). Defensive responses of Brandt’s voles (Lasiopodomys brandtii) to stored cat feces. Physiology & Behavior 123, 193–199.
Defensive responses of Brandt’s voles (Lasiopodomys brandtii) to stored cat feces.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXhvV2ru7bJ&md5=7eb712a09a67a4f3155b8af333dadd4eCAS |

Litkin, K. E. (2010). Animal welfare and pest control: meeting both conservation and animal welfare goals. Animal Welfare 19, 171–176.

Mella, V. S. A., Cooper, C. E., and Davies, S. J. J. F. (2014). Behavioural responses of free-ranging western grey kangaroos (Macropus fuliginosus) to olfactory cues of historical and recently introduced predators. Austral Ecology 39, 115–121.
Behavioural responses of free-ranging western grey kangaroos (Macropus fuliginosus) to olfactory cues of historical and recently introduced predators.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Munoz, N. E., and Blumstein, D. T. (2012). Multisensory perception in uncertain environments. Behavioral Ecology 23, 457–462.
Multisensory perception in uncertain environments.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Murray, P. J., Burns, A. C., and Davy, J. R. (2006). Development of an animal repellent selection, efficacy and presentation. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 46, 851–856.
Development of an animal repellent selection, efficacy and presentation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ostendorf, B., Taggart, D., Sparrow, E., Koenig, M., Matshall, V., Achurch, H., Malam, C., Campbell, L., and Turner, D. (2012). Southern hairy-nosed wombats in the Murraylands. Report for Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources, Adelaide.

Pal, S. K. (2003). Urine marking by free-ranging dogs (Canis familiaris) in relation to sex, season, place and posture. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 80, 45–59.
Urine marking by free-ranging dogs (Canis familiaris) in relation to sex, season, place and posture.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Parsons, M. H., and Blumstein, D. T. (2010a). Familiarity breeds contempt: kangaroos persistently avoid an area with experimentally deployed dingo scents. PLoS One 5, e10403.
Familiarity breeds contempt: kangaroos persistently avoid an area with experimentally deployed dingo scents.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Parsons, M. H., and Blumstein, D. T. (2010b). Feeling vulnerable? Indirect risk cues differently influence how two marsupials respond to novel dingo urine. Ethology 116, 972–980.
Feeling vulnerable? Indirect risk cues differently influence how two marsupials respond to novel dingo urine.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Parsons, M. H., Lamont, B. B., Kovacs, B. R., and Davies, S. J. J. F. (2007). Effects of novel and historic predator urines on semi-wild western grey kangaroos. Journal of Wildlife Management 71, 1225–1228.
Effects of novel and historic predator urines on semi-wild western grey kangaroos.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Peacor, S. D. (2006). Behavioural response of bullfrog tadpoles to chemical cues of predation risk are affected by cue age and water source. Hydrobiologia 573, 39–44.
Behavioural response of bullfrog tadpoles to chemical cues of predation risk are affected by cue age and water source.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XhtFKgu7zN&md5=7a777820038c16357a1a47a5471d5b1fCAS |

Ramp, D., Russell, B. G., and Croft, D. B. (2005). Predator scent induces differing responses in two sympatric macropodids. Australian Journal of Zoology 53, 73–78.
Predator scent induces differing responses in two sympatric macropodids.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Russell, B. G., and Banks, P. B. (2007). Do Australian small mammals respond to native and introduced predator odours? Austral Ecology 32, 277–286.
Do Australian small mammals respond to native and introduced predator odours?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Schultz, C. J., Dalton, R. N., Turner, C., and Neil, D. B. (2000). Freezing method affects the concentration and variability of urine proteins and the interpretation of data on microalbuminuria. Diabetic Medicine 17, 7–14.
Freezing method affects the concentration and variability of urine proteins and the interpretation of data on microalbuminuria.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXhsFahsL4%3D&md5=61b4be80be2d37c110b880c5031c7328CAS | 10691153PubMed |

Sparrow, E. E. (2012). Understanding the southern hairy-nosed wombat in the Far West and on Eyre Peninsula: community engagement and ecological research. Report for Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources, Adelaide.

Sparrow, E. E., Taggart, D. A., and O’Brien, C. (2011). State-wide survey of southern hairy-nosed wombats. Report for Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources, Adelaide.

Stott, A. V. (1998). Problems with southern hairy-nosed wombats Lasiorhinus latifrons in the agricultural lands of the far west coast of South Australia. In ‘Wombats’. (Eds R. T. Wells and P. A. Pridmore.) pp. 280–286. (Surrey Beatty: Sydney.)

Taylor, R. J. (1993). Observations on the behaviour and ecology of the common wombat, Vombatus ursinus, in northeast Tasmania. Australian Mammalogy 16, 1–7.

Temby, I. D. (1998). The law and wombats in Australia. In ‘Wombats’. (Eds R. T. Wells and P. A. Pridmore.) pp. 305–311. (Surrey Beatty: Sydney.)

Triggs, B., Brunner, H., and Cullen, J. (1984). The food of fox, dog and cat in Croajingalong National Park, south-eastern Victoria. Wildlife Research 11, 491–499.
The food of fox, dog and cat in Croajingalong National Park, south-eastern Victoria.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Walker, F. M., Sunnucks, D., and Taylor, A. C. (2006). Genotyping of ‘captured’ hairs reveal burrow-use and ranging behavior on southern hairy-nosed wombats (Lasiorhinus latifrons). Journal of Mammalogy 87, 690–699.
Genotyping of ‘captured’ hairs reveal burrow-use and ranging behavior on southern hairy-nosed wombats (Lasiorhinus latifrons).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wyatt, T. D. (2003). ‘Pheromones and Animal Behaviour: Communication by Smell and Taste.’ (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.)