Register      Login
Australian Health Review Australian Health Review Society
Journal of the Australian Healthcare & Hospitals Association
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Coordination of care in Australian mental health policy

Michelle A. Banfield A D , Karen L. Gardner A , Laurann E. Yen A , Ian S. McRae B , James A. Gillespie C and Robert W. Wells A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Menzies Centre for Health Policy, Australian National University, Level 1, Ian Potter House, Cnr Gordon & Marcus Clarke Sts, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia. Email: karen.gardner@anu.edu.au; laurann.yen@anu.edu.au; robert.wells@anu.edu.au

B Australian Primary Health Care Research Institute, Australian National University, Level 1, Ian Potter House, Cnr Gordon & Marcus Clarke Sts, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia. Email: ian.s.mcrae@anu.edu.au

C Menzies Centre for Health Policy, University of Sydney, Victor Coppleson Building (D02), The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia. Email: james.gillespie@sydney.edu.au

D Corresponding author. Email: michelle.banfield@anu.edu.au

Australian Health Review 36(2) 153-157 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH11049
Submitted: 23 May 2011  Accepted: 12 October 2011   Published: 25 May 2012

Abstract

Objective. To review Australian mental health initiatives involving coordination of care.

Methods. Commonwealth government websites were systematically searched for mental health policy documents. Database searches were also conducted using the terms ‘coordination’ or ‘integration’ and ‘mental health’ or ‘mental illness’ and ‘Australia’. We assessed the extent to which informational, relational and management continuity have been addressed in three example programs.

Results. The lack of definition of coordination at the policy level reduces opportunities for developing actionable and measurable programs. Of the 51 mental health initiatives identified, the three examples studied all demonstrated some use of the dimensions of continuity to facilitate coordination. However, problems with funding, implementation, evaluation and competing agendas between key stakeholders were barriers to improving coordination.

Conclusions. Coordination is possible and can improve both relationships between providers and care provided. However, clear leadership, governance and funding structures are needed to manage the challenges encountered, and evaluation using appropriate outcome measures, structured to assess the elements of continuity, is necessary to detect improvements in coordination.

What is known about the topic? The issues of integration of services and coordination of care have been a part of the National Mental Health Strategy documents for almost 20 years, but reports and evaluations continually note a lack of solid progress on these reforms.

What does this paper add? This paper examines how the key elements of continuity that underpin coordination have been addressed in three examples of Australian mental health initiatives aimed at improving integration and coordination.

What are the implications for practitioners? Coordination of care for mental health is possible and can improve both relationships between providers and care provided, but attention should be paid to the role of informational, relationship and management continuity in program design and implementation.


References

[1]  Australian Government. A national health and hospitals network for Australia’s future: delivering the reforms. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2010.

[2]  Australian Government. A national health and hospitals network for Australia’s future. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2010.

[3]  Department of Health and Ageing. Guidelines for the establishment and initial operation of Medicare Locals. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2011.

[4]  National Mental Health Reform – Ministerial Statement. Canberra: Australian Government; 2011.

[5]  Hickie IB, Groom GL, McGorry PD, Davenport TA, Luscombe GM. Australian mental health reform: time for real outcomes. Med J Aust 2005; 182 401–6.
| 15850437PubMed |

[6]  Andrews G. The crisis in mental health: the chariot needs one horseman. Med J Aust 2005; 182 372–3.
| 15850428PubMed |

[7]  Department of Health and Ageing. National mental health report 2010: summary of 15 years of reform in Australia’s Mental Health Services under the National Mental Health Strategy 1993–2008. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2010.

[8]  Steering Committee for the Evaluation of the Second National Mental Health Plan 1998–2003. Evaluation of the Second National Mental Health Plan. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2003.

[9]  Australian Health Ministers. National Mental Health Plan. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 1992.

[10]  Haggerty JL, Reid RJ, Freeman GK, Starfield BH, Adair CE, McKendry R. Continuity of care: a multidisciplinary review. BMJ 2003; 327 1219–21.
Continuity of care: a multidisciplinary review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 14630762PubMed |

[11]  Australian Government. Mental health & well being – mental health in Australia. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2010. Available from http://www.health.gov.au/internet/mentalhealth/publishing.nsf/content/home-1. [verified 5 April 2011].

[12]  Council of Australian Governments (COAG). National action plan on mental health 2006–2011. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2006.

[13]  Hickie IB, Groom GL. Surveying perceptions of the progress of national mental health reform. Australas Psychiatry 2004; 12 123–5.

[14]  Department of Families Housing Community Services and Indigenous Affairs. Personal helpers and mentors (PHaMs) resource kit. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2010.

[15]  Australian Health Ministers. National Mental Health Policy. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 1992.

[16]  Whiteford H, Buckingham B, Manderscheid R. Australia’s National Mental Health Strategy. Br J Psychiatry 2002; 180 210–5.
Australia’s National Mental Health Strategy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 11872512PubMed |

[17]  Australian Health Ministers. Second National Mental Health Plan. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 1998.

[18]  Australian Health Ministers. National Mental Health Plan 2003–2008. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2003.

[19]  Australian Health Ministers. Fourth National Mental Health Plan. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2009.

[20]  Crosbie DW. Mental health policy – stumbling in the dark? Med J Aust 2009; 190 S43–5.
| 19220174PubMed |

[21]  Whiteford HA, Buckingham WJ. Ten years of mental health service reform in Australia: are we getting it right? Med J Aust 2005; 182 396–400.
| 15850436PubMed |

[22]  Pirkis J, Harris M, Hall W, Ftanou M. Evaluation of the Better Access to Psychiatrists, Psychologists and General Practitioners through the Medicare Benefits Schedule Initiative. Summative evaluation. Melbourne: Centre for Health Policy, Programs and Economics; 2011.

[23]  Department of Health and Aged Care. Planning guidelines for National Demonstration Projects in Integrated Mental Health Care. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 1999.

[24]  Whiteford H. Intersectoral policy reform is critical to the National Mental Health Strategy. Aust J Public Health 1994; 18 342–4.
Intersectoral policy reform is critical to the National Mental Health Strategy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK2M7ktlemsw%3D%3D&md5=789724525376d56a4083c591e0aeed5fCAS | 7841269PubMed |

[25]  Eagar K, Pirkis JE, Owen A, Burgess PM, Posner N, Perkins DA. Lessons from the National Mental Health Integration Program. Aust Health Rev 2005; 29 189–200.
Lessons from the National Mental Health Integration Program.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15865570PubMed |

[26]  Mental Health Standing Committee of the Australian Health Ministers’ Advisory Council. Council of Australian Governments’ National Action Plan for Mental Health 2006–2011 Second progress report covering implementation to 2007–08. Canberra: Australian Health Ministers’ Conference; 2009.

[27]  Muir K, Powell A, Patulny R, Flaxman S, McDermott S, Oprea I. et al. Headspace evaluation report. Sydney: Social Policy Research Centre, University of New South Wales; 2009.

[28]  Callaly T, von Treuer K, van Hamond T, Windle K. Forming and sustaining partnerships to provide integrated services for young people: an overview based on the headspace Geelong experience. Early Interv Psychiatry 2011; 5 28–33.
Forming and sustaining partnerships to provide integrated services for young people: an overview based on the headspace Geelong experience.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21208388PubMed |

[29]  Callaly T, Fletcher A. Providing integrated mental health services: a policy and management perspective. Australas Psychiatry 2005; 13 351–6.
| 16403129PubMed |

[30]  Mitchell P. Mental health care roles of non-medical primary health and social care services. Health Soc Care Community 2009; 17 71–82.
Mental health care roles of non-medical primary health and social care services.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18700871PubMed |

[31]  Mitchell PF. A discourse analysis on how service providers in non-medical primary health and social care services understand their roles in mental health care. Soc Sci Med 2009; 68 1213–20.
A discourse analysis on how service providers in non-medical primary health and social care services understand their roles in mental health care.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19208368PubMed |

[32]  Pirkis J, Burgess P, Coombs T, Clarke A, Jones-Ellis D, Dickson R. Routine measurement of outcomes in Australia’s public sector mental health services. Aust New Zealand Health Policy 2005; 2
Routine measurement of outcomes in Australia’s public sector mental health services.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[33]  Vinson N, Brannan A, Baughman L, Wilce M, Gawron T. The system-of-care model: implementation in twenty-seven communities. J Emot Behav Disord 2001; 9 30–42.
The system-of-care model: implementation in twenty-seven communities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[34]  Rosenblatt A, Woodbridge M. Deconstructing research on systems of care for youth with EBD: frameworks for policy research. J Emot Behav Disord 2003; 11 27–37.
Deconstructing research on systems of care for youth with EBD: frameworks for policy research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[35]  Minkoff K, Cline C. Changing the world: the design and implementation of comprehensive continuous integrated systems of care for individuals with co-occurring disorders. Psychiatr Clin North Am 2004; 27 727–43.
Changing the world: the design and implementation of comprehensive continuous integrated systems of care for individuals with co-occurring disorders.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15550290PubMed |