What is the role of health systems in responding to domestic violence? An evidence review
Jo Spangaro
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
School of Social Sciences, UNSW Australia, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia. Email: j.spangaro@unsw.edu.au
Australian Health Review 41(6) 639-645 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH16155
Submitted: 11 July 2016 Accepted: 4 November 2016 Published: 20 January 2017
Abstract
Objective The aim of the present study was to review and analyse academic literature and program evaluations to identify promising evidence for health system responses to domestic violence in Australia and internationally.
Methods English-language literature published between January 2005 and March 2016 was retrieved from search results using the terms ‘domestic violence’ or ‘intimate partner violence’ in different combinations with other relevant terms, resulting in 1671 documents, of which 59 were systematic reviews. Electronic databases (Medline (Ovid), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Psycinfo, Social work Abstracts, Informit, Violence and Abuse Abstracts, Family Studies Abstracts, Cochrane Library of Systematic Reviews and EMBASE) were searched and narrative analysis undertaken.
Results This review details the evidence base for the following interventions by health services responding to domestic violence: first-line responses, routine screening, risk assessment and safety planning, counselling with women, mother–child interventions, responses to perpetrators, child protection notifications, training and system-level responses.
Conclusions There is growing evidence for the effectiveness of health service interventions to reduce the extent of harm caused by domestic violence.
What is known about the topic? Domestic violence is a significant problem globally with enormous human, social and economic costs. Although women who have experienced abuse make extensive use of healthcare services, health services have lagged behind the policing, criminal justice and other human service domains in responding to domestic violence.
What does this paper add? The present comprehensive review identifies best-practice health system responses to domestic violence.
What are the implications for practitioners? Health systems can play a key role in identifying and responding to domestic violence for women who often do not access other services. There is growing evidence for the effectiveness of health service interventions to reduce the extent of harm caused by domestic violence, in particular for specialist counselling, structured risk assessment and safety planning, training for first-line responses and interventions for mothers and children affected by domestic violence.
References
[1] García-Moreno C, Pallitto C, Devries K, Stöckl H, Watts C, Abrahams N. Global and regional estimates of violence against women: prevalence and health effects of intimate partner violence and non-partner sexual violence. Geneva: World Health Organization, Department of Reproductive Health and Research, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, South African Medical Research Council; 2013.[2] Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). Personal safety, Australia, 2012. Melbourne: ABS; 2013.
[3] Willis M. Non-disclosure of violence in Australian Indigenous communities. Trends and issues in crime and criminal justice. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology; 2011.
[4] García-Moreno C, Hegarty K, d’Oliveira A, Koziol-McLain J, Colombini M, Feder G. The health-systems response to violence against women. Lancet 2015; 385 1567–79.
| The health-systems response to violence against women.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[5] Sugg N. Intimate partner violence: prevalence, health consequences, and intervention. Med Clin North Am 2015; 99 629–49.
| Intimate partner violence: prevalence, health consequences, and intervention.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[6] Alhabib S, Nur U, Jones R. Domestic violence against women: systematic review of prevalence studies. J Fam Violence 2010; 25 369–82.
| Domestic violence against women: systematic review of prevalence studies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[7] Rivara F, Anderson M, Fishman P, Bonomi A, Reid R, Carrell D, Thompson R. Intimate partner violence and health care costs and utilization for children living in the home. Pediatrics 2007; 120 1270–7.
| Intimate partner violence and health care costs and utilization for children living in the home.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[8] Stark E. Coercive control: how men entrap women in personal life. New York: Oxford University Press; 2007.
[9] McCloskey L, Williams C, Lichter E, Gerber M, Ganz M, Sege R. Abused women disclose partner interference with health care: an unrecognized form of battering. J Gen Intern Med 2007; 22 1067–72.
| Abused women disclose partner interference with health care: an unrecognized form of battering.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[10] Feder GS, Hutson M, Ramsay J, Taket AR. Women exposed to intimate partner violence: expectations and experiences when they encounter health care professionals: a meta-analysis of qualitative studies. Arch Intern Med 2006; 166 22–37.
| Women exposed to intimate partner violence: expectations and experiences when they encounter health care professionals: a meta-analysis of qualitative studies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[11] Evans MA, Feder G. Help-seeking amongst women survivors of domestic violence: a qualitative study of pathways towards formal and informal support. Health Expect 2016; 19 62–73.
| Help-seeking amongst women survivors of domestic violence: a qualitative study of pathways towards formal and informal support.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[12] World Health Organization (WHO). Responding to intimate partner violence and sexual violence against women: WHO clinical and policy guidelines. Geneva: WHO; 2013.
[13] National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Domestic violence and abuse: how health services, social care and the organisations they work with can respond effectively. London: NICE; 2014.
[14] Feder G, Ramsay J, Dunne D, Rose M, Arsene C, Norman R, Kuntze S, Spencer A, Bacchus L, Hague G, Warburton A, Taket A. How far does screening women for domestic violence in different health-care settings meet criteria for a screening programme? Systematic reviews of nine UK National Screening Committee criteria. Health Technol Assess 2009; 13 1–113.
| How far does screening women for domestic violence in different health-care settings meet criteria for a screening programme? Systematic reviews of nine UK National Screening Committee criteria.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[15] Ramsay J, Rivas C, Feder G. Interventions to reduce violence and promote the physical and psychosocial well-being of women who experience partner abuse: a systematic review. London: Department of Health; 2005. Available at: http://www.equation.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/Interventions-a-systematic-review-of-controlled-evaluations.pdf [verified 30 September 2014].
[16] Rivas C, Ramsay J, Sadowski L, Davidson LL, Dunne D, Eldridge S, Hegarty K, Taft A, Feder G. Advocacy interventions to help women who experience intimate partner abuse to access community resources. Cochrane Library; 2015. Available at: http://www.cochrane.org/CD005043/BEHAV_advocacy-interventions-help-women-who-experience-intimate-partner-abuse-access-community-resources [verified 14 September 2016].
[17] Phelan MB. Screening for intimate partner violence in medical settings. Trauma Violence Abuse 2007; 8 199–213.
| Screening for intimate partner violence in medical settings.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[18] Dienemann J, Glass N, Hyman R. Survivor preferences for response to IPV disclosure. Clin Nurs Res 2005; 14 215–33.
| Survivor preferences for response to IPV disclosure.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[19] Irwin J, Waugh F. Unless they’re asked: routine screening for domestic violence in NSW Health – an evaluation report of the pilot project. Sydney: NSW Health; 2001. Available at: /http://www.health.nsw.gov.au/kidsfamilies/protection/Publications/unless-they-are-asked-pilot-evaluation.pdf [verified 23 November 2016].
[20] Koziol-McLain J, Giddings L, Rameka M, Fyfe E. Intimate partner violence screening and brief intervention: experiences of women in two New Zealand health care settings. J Midwifery Womens Health 2008; 53 504–10.
| Intimate partner violence screening and brief intervention: experiences of women in two New Zealand health care settings.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[21] Plichta S. Interactions between victims of intimate partner violence against women and the health care system: policy and practice implications. Trauma Violence Abuse 2007; 8 226–39.
| Interactions between victims of intimate partner violence against women and the health care system: policy and practice implications.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[22] Trabold N. Screening for intimate partner violence within a health care setting: a systematic review of the literature. Soc Work Health Care 2007; 45 1–18.
| Screening for intimate partner violence within a health care setting: a systematic review of the literature.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[23] Rabin R, Jennings J, Campbell J, Bair-Merritt M. Intimate partner violence screening tools: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med 2009; 36 439–45.
| Intimate partner violence screening tools: a systematic review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[24] O’Reilly R, Beale B, Gillies D. Screening and intervention for domestic violence during pregnancy care: a systematic review. Trauma Violence Abuse 2010; 11 190–201.
[25] Zhang Y-L, Zhang Y-L, He Y, Liu N. Introduction of common domestic violence assessment tools. Chin J Clin Psychol 2010; 3 320–2.
[26] O’Campo P, Kirst M, Tsamis C, Chambers C, Ahmad F. Implementing successful intimate partner violence screening programs in health care settings: evidence generated from a realist informed systematic review. Soc Sci Med 2011; 72 855–66.
| Implementing successful intimate partner violence screening programs in health care settings: evidence generated from a realist informed systematic review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[27] Todahl J, Walters E. Universal screening for intimate partner violence: a systematic review. J Marital Fam Ther 2011; 37 355–69.
| Universal screening for intimate partner violence: a systematic review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[28] Nelson H, Bougatsos C, Blazina I. Screening women for intimate partner violence: a systematic review to update the 2004 US Preventive Service Task Force recommendation. Ann Intern Med 2012; 156 796–808.
| Screening women for intimate partner violence: a systematic review to update the 2004 US Preventive Service Task Force recommendation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[29] Taft A, O’Doherty L, Hegarty K, Ramsay J, Davidson L, Feder G. Screening women for intimate partner violence in health care settings. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 4 CD007007
| Screening women for intimate partner violence in health care settings.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[30] Moyer VA, US Preventive Services Task Force Primary care interventions to prevent child maltreatment: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 2013; 159 289–95.
| Primary care interventions to prevent child maltreatment: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[31] Bair-Merritt M, Jennings J, Chen R, Burrell L, Mcfarlane E, Fuddy L, Duggan A. Reducing maternal intimate partner violence after the birth of a child: a randomized controlled trial of the Hawaii Healthy Start Home Visitation Program. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2010; 164 16–23.
| Reducing maternal intimate partner violence after the birth of a child: a randomized controlled trial of the Hawaii Healthy Start Home Visitation Program.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[32] Kiely M, El-Mohandes A, El-Khorazaty M, Gantz M. An integrated intervention to reduce intimate partner violence in pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 115 273–83.
| An integrated intervention to reduce intimate partner violence in pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[33] Miller E, Decker M, Mccauley J, Tancredi D, Levenson R, Waldman J. A family planning clinic partner violence intervention to reduce risk associated with reproductive coercion. Contraception 2011; 83 274–80.
| A family planning clinic partner violence intervention to reduce risk associated with reproductive coercion.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[34] Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). Screening for domestic violence during pregnancy: options for future reporting in the national perinatal data collection. Canberra: AIHW; 2015.
[35] Office of Kids and Families, NSW Ministry of Health. Domestic violence routine screening November 2014 Snapshot 12 (2014): North Sydney: NSW Ministry of Health; 2016. Available at: http://www.kidsfamilies.health.nsw.gov.au/media/359971/Domestic-Violence-Routine-Screening-Snapshot-12-November-2014.pdf [verified 23 November 2016].
[36] Spangaro J, Zwi A, Poulos R. ‘Persist. Persist’: a qualitative study of women’s decisions to disclose and their perceptions of the impact of routine screening for intimate partner violence. Psychol Violence 2011; 1 150–62.
| ‘Persist. Persist’: a qualitative study of women’s decisions to disclose and their perceptions of the impact of routine screening for intimate partner violence.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[37] Bacchus L, Aston G, Torres Vitolas C, Jordan P, Murray S. Evaluation of a domestic violence intervention in the maternity and sexual health services of a UK hospital. Reprod Health Matters 2010; 18 147–57.
| Evaluation of a domestic violence intervention in the maternity and sexual health services of a UK hospital.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[38] Spangaro J, Koziol-McLain J, Zwi A, Rutherford A, Frail M, Ruane J. Deciding to tell: qualitative configurational analysis of decisions to disclose experience of intimate partner violence in antenatal care. Soc Sci Med 2016; 154 45–53.
| Deciding to tell: qualitative configurational analysis of decisions to disclose experience of intimate partner violence in antenatal care.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[39] Nicholls TL, Pritchard MM, Reeves KA, Hilterman E. Risk assessment in intimate partner violence: a systematic review of contemporary approaches. Partn Abus 2013; 4 76–168.
| Risk assessment in intimate partner violence: a systematic review of contemporary approaches.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[40] Bloom TL, Glass NE, Case J, Wright C, Nolte K, Parsons L. Feasibility of an online safety planning intervention for rural and urban pregnant abused women. Nurs Res 2014; 63 243–51.
| Feasibility of an online safety planning intervention for rural and urban pregnant abused women.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[41] Tarzia L, Murray E, Humphreys C, Glass N, Taft A, Valpied J, Hegarty K. I-DECIDE: an online intervention drawing on the psychosocial readiness model for women experiencing domestic violence. Womens Health Issues 2016; 26 208–16.
| I-DECIDE: an online intervention drawing on the psychosocial readiness model for women experiencing domestic violence.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[42] Koziol-McLain J, Vandal A, Nada-Raja S, Wilson D, Glass N, Eden K, McLean C, Dobbs T, Case J. A web-based intervention for abused women: the New Zealand isafe randomised controlled trial protocol. BMC Public Health 2015; 15 56
| A web-based intervention for abused women: the New Zealand isafe randomised controlled trial protocol.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[43] Eden K, Perrin N, Hanson G, Messing J, Bloom T, Campbell J, Glass N. Use of online safety decision aid by abused women: effect on decisional conflict in a randomized controlled trial. Am J Prev Med 2015; 48 372–83.
| Use of online safety decision aid by abused women: effect on decisional conflict in a randomized controlled trial.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[44] Hegarty K, O’Doherty L, Taft A, Chondros P, Brown S, Valpied J, Astbury J, Taket A, Gold L, Feder G, Gunn J. Screening and counselling in the primary care setting for women who have experienced intimate partner violence (WEAVE): a cluster randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2013; 382 249–58.
| Screening and counselling in the primary care setting for women who have experienced intimate partner violence (WEAVE): a cluster randomised controlled trial.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[45] Spangaro J, Zwi A, Poulos R, Man W. Six months after routine screening for intimate partner violence: attitude change, useful and adverse effects. Women Health 2010; 50 125–43.
| Six months after routine screening for intimate partner violence: attitude change, useful and adverse effects.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3czgsFGjtQ%3D%3D&md5=07d4dc5fe995a618f3e12549bd81dbf2CAS |
[46] Curry M, Durham L, Bullock L, Bloom T, Davis J. Nurse case management for pregnant women experiencing or at risk for abuse. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2006; 35 181–92.
| Nurse case management for pregnant women experiencing or at risk for abuse.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[47] Gartland D, Woolhouse H, Mensah F, Hegarty K, Hiscock H, Brown S. The case for early intervention to reduce the impact of intimate partner abuse on child outcomes: results of an Australian cohort of first-time mothers. Birth 2014; 41 374–83.
| The case for early intervention to reduce the impact of intimate partner abuse on child outcomes: results of an Australian cohort of first-time mothers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[48] Hickman L, Setodji C, Jaycox L, Kofner A, Schultz D, Barnes-Proby D, Harris R. Assessing programs designed to improve outcomes for children exposed to violence: results from nine randomized controlled trials. J Exp Criminol 2013; 9 301–31.
| Assessing programs designed to improve outcomes for children exposed to violence: results from nine randomized controlled trials.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[49] Buchanan F. Mother and infant attachment theory and domestic violence: crossing the divide. Stakeholder paper 5. Sydney: Australian Domestic & Family Violence Clearinghouse; 2008.
[50] Thiara RK, Humphreys C. Absent presence: the ongoing impact of men’s violence on the mother–child relationship. Child Fam Soc Work 2016;
| Absent presence: the ongoing impact of men’s violence on the mother–child relationship.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[51] Hooker L, Kaspiew R, Taft A. Domestic and family violence and parenting: mixed methods insights into impact and support needs. State of knowledge paper. Sydney: ANROWS; 2016. Available at: http://media.aomx.com/anrows.org.au/s3fs-public/L1.16_1.8%20Parenting.pdf [verified 14 September 2016].
[52] Graham-Bermann SA, Miller LE. Intervention to reduce traumatic stress following intimate partner violence: an efficacy trial of the Moms’ Empowerment Program (MEP). Psychodyn Psychiatry 2013; 41 329–49.
| Intervention to reduce traumatic stress following intimate partner violence: an efficacy trial of the Moms’ Empowerment Program (MEP).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[53] McFarlane J, Symes L, Binder B, Maddoux J, Paulson R. Maternal–child dyads of functioning: the intergenerational impact of violence against women on children. Matern Child Health J 2014; 18 2236–43.
| Maternal–child dyads of functioning: the intergenerational impact of violence against women on children.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[54] Akoensi T, Koehler J, Losel F, Humphreys D. Domestic violence perpetrator programs in Europe, part II: a systematic review of the state of evidence. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol 2013; 57 1206–25.
| Domestic violence perpetrator programs in Europe, part II: a systematic review of the state of evidence.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[55] Laing L, Humphreys C, Cavanagh K. Social work and domestic violence: developing critical and reflective practice. London: Sage Publications; 2013.
[56] Williamson E, Jones SK, Ferrari G, Debbonaire T, Feder G, Hester M. Health professionals responding to men for safety (HERMES): feasibility of a general practice training intervention to improve the response to male patients who have experienced or perpetrated domestic violence and abuse. Prim Health Care Res Dev 2015; 16 281–8.
| Health professionals responding to men for safety (HERMES): feasibility of a general practice training intervention to improve the response to male patients who have experienced or perpetrated domestic violence and abuse.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[57] Stover CS, Morgos D. Fatherhood and intimate partner violence: bringing the parenting role into intervention strategies. Prof Psychol Res Pr 2013; 44 247–56.
| Fatherhood and intimate partner violence: bringing the parenting role into intervention strategies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[58] Flood M, Fergus L. An assault on our future: the impact of violence on young people and their relationships. A White Ribbon Foundation report. 2008. Available at: http://www.whiteribbon.org.au/uploads/media/Research_series/An_assault_on_our_future_FULL_Flood__Fergus_2010.pdf [verified 16 November 2014].
[59] Antle B, Barbee A, Yankeelov P, Bledsoe L. A qualitative evaluation of the effects of mandatory reporting of domestic violence on victims and their children. J Fam Soc Work 2010; 13 56–73.
| A qualitative evaluation of the effects of mandatory reporting of domestic violence on victims and their children.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[60] Humphreys C. Problems in the system of mandatory reporting of children living with domestic violence. J Fam Stud 2008; 14 228–39.
| Problems in the system of mandatory reporting of children living with domestic violence.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[61] Potito C, Day A, Carson E, O’Leary P. Domestic violence and child protection: partnerships and collaboration. Aust Soc Work 2009; 62 369–87.
| Domestic violence and child protection: partnerships and collaboration.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[62] Humphreys C, Absler D. History repeating: child protection responses to domestic violence. Child Fam Soc Work 2011; 16 464–73.
| History repeating: child protection responses to domestic violence.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[63] Minsky-Kelly D, Hamberger LK, Pape DA, Wolff M. We’ve had training, now what? Qualitative analysis of barriers to domestic violence screening and referral in a health care setting. J Interpers Violence 2005; 20 1288–309.
| We’ve had training, now what? Qualitative analysis of barriers to domestic violence screening and referral in a health care setting.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[64] Feder G, Davies RA, Baird K, Dunne D, Eldridge S, Griffiths C, Gregory A, Howell A, Johnson M, Ramsay J, Rutterford C, Sharp D. Identification and Referral to Improve Safety (IRIS) of women experiencing domestic violence with a primary care training and support programme: a cluster randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2011; 378 1788–95.
| Identification and Referral to Improve Safety (IRIS) of women experiencing domestic violence with a primary care training and support programme: a cluster randomised controlled trial.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[65] Spangaro J, Poulos R, Zwi A. Pandora doesn’t live here any more: normalization of screening for intimate partner violence in Australian antenatal, mental health and substance abuse services. Violence Vict 2011; 26 130–44.
| Pandora doesn’t live here any more: normalization of screening for intimate partner violence in Australian antenatal, mental health and substance abuse services.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[66] Ritchie M, Nelson K, Wills R, Jones L. Does training and documentation improve emergency department assessments of domestic violence victims? J Fam Violence 2013; 28 471–7.
| Does training and documentation improve emergency department assessments of domestic violence victims?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[67] Hamberger L, Rhodes K, Brown J. Screening and intervention for intimate partner violence in healthcare settings: creating sustainable system-level programs. J Womens Health 2015; 24 86–91.
| Screening and intervention for intimate partner violence in healthcare settings: creating sustainable system-level programs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[68] Wills R, Ritchie M, Wilson M. Improving detection and quality of assessment of child abuse and partner abuse is achievable with a formal organisational change approach. J Paediatr Child Health 2008; 44 92–8.
| Improving detection and quality of assessment of child abuse and partner abuse is achievable with a formal organisational change approach.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[69] Ambuel B, Hamberger L, Guse CE, Melzer-Lange M, Phelan MB, Kistner A. Healthcare can change from within: sustained improvement in the healthcare response to intimate partner violence. J Fam Violence 2013; 28 833–47.
| Healthcare can change from within: sustained improvement in the healthcare response to intimate partner violence.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
