Register      Login
Australian Health Review Australian Health Review Society
Journal of the Australian Healthcare & Hospitals Association
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Identification of vulnerability within a child and family health service

Katarina Kimla A , Dania Nathanson A , Susan Woolfenden A B and Karen Zwi A B C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Sydney Children’s Hospitals Network, High Street, Randwick, Sydney, NSW 2031, Australia. Email: ksekerasova@yahoo.com.au; daniamolnar@outlook.com

B UNSW Sydney, Barker Street, Kensington, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia. Email: Susan.Woolfenden@health.nsw.gov.au

C Corresponding author. Email: karen.zwi@health.nsw.gov.au

Australian Health Review 43(2) 171-177 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH17024
Submitted: 1 February 2017  Accepted: 6 October 2017   Published: 21 November 2017

Abstract

Objective The aims of the present study were to describe the prevalence of vulnerability in a cohort of newborns, identify the factors that increase the risk of vulnerability and examine whether those who are most vulnerable are receiving home visits.

Methods A prospective cross-sectional study was performed using data collected from questionnaires completed by child and family health nurses and obstetric discharge summaries for each mother–baby dyad. Descriptive frequencies and percentages are used to describe the proportions of children who were vulnerable, offered services and had risk factors for vulnerability. Categorical data were compared using Pearson’s Chi-squared analysis.

Results In all, 1517 newborns were included in the present study. Of these, 40.5% were identified as vulnerable and 13.9% had two or more risk factors for vulnerability (95% confidence interval (CI) 12–16%). The most common risk factors were biological. Across all newborns, 33.7% were visited at home, and 74.6% of vulnerable newborns were offered a home visit. Children identified as vulnerable were more likely to have a home visit than those who were not (z for 95% CI = 1.96; P < 0.1).

Conclusions Although the high reported prevalence of identified risk needs to be confirmed in further studies, identifying vulnerability allowed the offer of home visiting to be directed towards those most likely to benefit.

What is known about the topic? Of the Australian child population, 10–20% are vulnerable to adverse health, developmental and wellbeing outcomes. Vulnerable infants are at a greater risk of becoming vulnerable children, adolescents and adults over the life course. Biological and psychosocial risk factors for vulnerability are well described. Families with the greatest need are often the least likely to access or receive support, and have lower utilisation of preventative health services despite evidence that support in the first few years of life can significantly improve long-term outcomes.

What does this paper add? This paper provides a detailed description of vulnerabilities in a cohort of newborns and demonstrates that it is possible to assign risk of vulnerability within existing child and family health services using tools that identify biological and psychosocial risk factors. Identification of vulnerability risk allows prioritisation of services to those with the greatest need.

What are the implications for practitioners? It is possible to identify vulnerability risk within child and family health services. This allows those families at risk of future adverse health, developmental and wellbeing outcomes to be prioritised to receive health services and supports.


References

[1]  Joshua P, Zwi K, Moran P, White L. Prioritising vulnerable children: why should we address inequity? Child Care Health Dev 2015; 41 818–26.
Prioritising vulnerable children: why should we address inequity?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC2MbjslSntw%3D%3D&md5=198337bdfc86e913cb29fee80e466dcaCAS |

[2]  National Scientific Council on the Developing Child. Early experiences can alter gene expression and affect long-term development: working paper no. 10. Center on the Developing Child Harvard University; 2010. Available at: http://developingchild.harvard.edu/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Early-Experiences-Can-Alter-Gene-Expression-and-Affect-Long-Term-Development.pdf [verified 27 October 2017].

[3]  Maggi S, Irwin LJ, Siddiqi A, Hertzman C. The social determinants of early child development: an overview. J Paediatr Child Health 2010; 46 627–35.
The social determinants of early child development: an overview.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[4]  Sameroff A. The transactional model. In: A. E. Sameroff, editor. The transactional model of development: how children and contexts shape each other. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2009. pp. 3–21.

[5]  National Research Council and Institute of Medicine. From neurons to neighborhoods: the science of early childhood development. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2000. Available at: http://www.nap.edu/read/9824/chapter/1 [verified 26 October 2017].

[6]  Hertzman C, Boyce T. How experience gets under the skin to create gradients in developmental health. Annu Rev Public Health 2010; 31 329–47.
How experience gets under the skin to create gradients in developmental health.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[7]  Siddiqi A, Irwin LG, Hertzman C. Total environment assessment model of early child development. Evidence report. Commission on Social Determinants of Health, World Health Organization; 2007. Available at: http://www.who.int/social_determinants/resources/ecd_kn_evidence_report_2007.pdf [verified 27 October 2017].

[8]  Hertzman C. The biological embedding of early experience and its effects on health in adulthood. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1999; 896 85–95.
The biological embedding of early experience and its effects on health in adulthood.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7ks1Cksw%3D%3D&md5=0a15d942e2d092eac0f724ff44fc270bCAS |

[9]  Mustard JF. Experience-based brain development: scientific underpinnings of the importance of early child development in a global world. Paediatr Child Health 2006; 11 571–2.
Experience-based brain development: scientific underpinnings of the importance of early child development in a global world.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[10]  Koenen KC, Moffitt T, Caspi A, Taylor A, Purcell S. Domestic violence is associated with environmental suppression of IQ in young children. Dev Psychopathol 2003; 15 297–311.
Domestic violence is associated with environmental suppression of IQ in young children.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[11]  Bor W, Najman JM, Andersen MJ, O’Callaghan M, Williams GM, Behrens BC. The relationship between low family income and psychological disturbance in young children: an Australian longitudinal study. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 1997; 31 664–75.
The relationship between low family income and psychological disturbance in young children: an Australian longitudinal study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK1c%2Fmt1Sntg%3D%3D&md5=0c8f4ea4ecacb6cc25c63585e11c4f7fCAS |

[12]  Werner EE. Vulnerable but invincible: high risk children from birth to adulthood. Acta Paediatr Suppl 1997; 86 103–5.
Vulnerable but invincible: high risk children from birth to adulthood.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[13]  Victorian Government. Strategy 2013–2022. Victoria’s vulnerable children. Our shared responsibility. 2013. Available at: http://www.education.vic.gov.au/Documents/about/programs/pathways/youthpartnerships/Victorias%20vulnerable%20children%20strategy.pdf [verified 27 October 2017].

[14]  Fox S, Southwell A, Stafford N, Goodhue R, Jackson D, Smith C. Better systems, better chances: a review of research and practice for prevention and early intervention. Canberra: Australian Research Alliance for Children and Youth; 2015.

[15]  Mistry RS, Benner AD, Biesanz JC, Clark SL, Howes C. Family and social risk, and parental investments during the early childhood years as predictors of low-income children’s school readiness outcomes. Early Child Res Q 2010; 25 432–49.
Family and social risk, and parental investments during the early childhood years as predictors of low-income children’s school readiness outcomes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[16]  NSW Department of Health. SAFE START Guidelines: Improving mental health outcomes for parents and infants, NSW Department of Health, Sydney. 2009. Available at: http://www1.health.nsw.gov.au/pds/ActivePDSDocuments/GL2010_004.pdf [verified 26 October 2017].

[17]  Goldberg WA, Prause J, Lucas-Thompson R, Himsel A. Maternal employment and children’s achievement in context: a meta-analysis of four decades of research. Psychol Bull 2008; 134 77–108.
Maternal employment and children’s achievement in context: a meta-analysis of four decades of research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[18]  Arnold DH, Doctoroff GL. The early education of socioeconomically disadvantaged children. Annu Rev Psychol 2003; 54 517–45.
The early education of socioeconomically disadvantaged children.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[19]  Reading R. Poverty and the health of children and adolescents. Arch Dis Child 1997; 76 463–7.
Poverty and the health of children and adolescents.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK2szjvFyitA%3D%3D&md5=5365708b424e93d00b737ca723299bbcCAS |

[20]  Felitti VJ, Anda RF, Nordenberg D, Williamson DF, Spitz AM, Edwards V, Koss MP, Marks JS. Relationship of childhood abuse and household dysfunction to many of the leading causes of death in adults. The Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) Study. Am J Prev Med 1998; 14 245–58.
Relationship of childhood abuse and household dysfunction to many of the leading causes of death in adults. The Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) Study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK1c3pvVyjug%3D%3D&md5=ad6d5ccb90fbcb17878565cab1fdeaafCAS |

[21]  Dube SR, Felitti VJ, Dong M, Chapman DP, Giles WH, Anda RF. Childhood abuse, neglect, and household dysfunction and the risk of illicit drug use: the adverse childhood experiences study. Pediatrics 2003; 111 564–72.
Childhood abuse, neglect, and household dysfunction and the risk of illicit drug use: the adverse childhood experiences study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[22]  Masten AS, Sesma A. Risk and resilience among children homeless in Minneapolis. CURA Reporter 1999; 29: 1–6. Available at: http://www.cura.umn.edu/sites/cura.advantagelabs.com/files/publications/29-1-Masten-Sesma.pdf [verified June 2016].

[23]  Stevens GD. Gradients in the health status and developmental risks of young children: the combined influences of multiple social risk factors. Matern Child Health J 2006; 10 187–99.
Gradients in the health status and developmental risks of young children: the combined influences of multiple social risk factors.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[24]  Heckman JJ. Schools, skills, and synapses. Econ Inq 2008; 46 289–324.
Schools, skills, and synapses.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[25]  Marmot M. Fair society, healthy lives (the Marmot Review). Strategic review of health inequalities in England post-2010. The Marmot Review: London; 2010. Available at http://www.instituteofhealthequity.org/resources-reports/fair-society-healthy-lives-the-marmot-review/fair-society-healthy-lives-full-report-pdf.pdf [verified 27 October 2017].

[26]  Wise PH. Confronting social disparities in child health: a critical appraisal of life-course science and research. Pediatrics 2009; 124 S203–11.
Confronting social disparities in child health: a critical appraisal of life-course science and research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[27]  Woolfenden S, Goldfield S, Raman S, Eapen V, Kemp L, Williams K. Inequity in child health: the importance of early childhood development. J Paediatr Child Health 2013; 49 E365–9.
Inequity in child health: the importance of early childhood development.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[28]  Woolfenden S, Williams K, Eapen V, Mensah F, Hayen A, Siddiqi A, Kemp L. Developmental vulnerability – don’t investigate without a model in mind. Child Care Health Dev 2015; 41 337–45.
Developmental vulnerability – don’t investigate without a model in mind.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC2cbosVaktQ%3D%3D&md5=3a00a44e2e3c67fc9412f92412ecd02fCAS |

[29]  Dawson G, Ashman SB, Carver LJ. The role of early experience in shaping behavioural and brain development and its implications for social policy. Dev Psychopathol 2000; 12 695–712.
The role of early experience in shaping behavioural and brain development and its implications for social policy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3itlKntw%3D%3D&md5=4521ab997790a54b3c9ea73926fbd4f6CAS |

[30]  Armstrong KL, Fraser JA, Dadds MR, Morris J. A randomized, controlled trial of nurse home visiting to vulnerable families with newborns. J Paediatr Child Health 1999; 35 237–44.
A randomized, controlled trial of nurse home visiting to vulnerable families with newborns.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK1Mzjt1Ghsw%3D%3D&md5=f179092cceee24a2aaf49c973dd1d72dCAS |

[31]  Aslam H, Kemp L. Home visiting in south western Sydney: an integrative literature review, description and development of a generic model. Sydney: Centre for Health Equity Training Research and Evaluation; 2005. Available at: http://cphce.unsw.edu.au/sites/default/files/publication_related_files/Home_visiting_SWS.pdf [verified 27 October 2017].

[32]  Kemp L, Harris E, McMahon C, Matthey S, Vimpani G, Anderson T, Schmied V. Miller Early Childhood Sustained Home-visiting (MECSH) trial: design, method and sample description. BMC Public Health 2008; 8 424
Miller Early Childhood Sustained Home-visiting (MECSH) trial: design, method and sample description.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[33]  Olds D, Henderson CR, Cole R, Eckenrode J, Kitzman H, Luckey D, Pettitt L, Sidora K, Morris P, Powers J. Long term effects of nurse home visitation on children’s criminal and antisocial behaviour: 15-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial. JAMA 1998; 280 1238–44.
Long term effects of nurse home visitation on children’s criminal and antisocial behaviour: 15-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2FgtVeguw%3D%3D&md5=0e37ea1342b9874e6d6983ee8e3d9118CAS |

[34]  Vimpani G. Home visiting: an essential building block to support families. Public Health Bulletin (Wash D C) 1998; 9 130 http://www.publish.csiro.au/?act=view_file&file_id=NB98042.pdf

[35]  Holzer P, Higgins JR, Bromfield L, Higgins D. The effectiveness of parent education and home visiting child maltreatment prevention programs. National Child Protection Clearinghouse Vol 24. Australian Institute of Family Studies 2006. Available at: https://aifs.gov.au/cfca/sites/default/files/publication-documents/issues24.pdf [verified 26 October 2017].

[36]  NSW Ministry of Health. Maternal & child health primary health care policy document number PD2010_017. 2010. Available at: http://www1.health.nsw.gov.au/pds/ActivePDSDocuments/PD2010_017.pdf [verified 26 October 2017].

[37]  Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Priority population groups. 2016. Available at: http://webarchive.nla.gov.au/gov/20170816085557/http://www.aihw.gov.au/priority-population-groups [verified 27 October 2017].

[38]  Centre for Epidemiology and Evidence. New South Wales mothers and babies 2012. Sydney: NSW Ministry of Health; 2014. Available at: http://www.health.nsw.gov.au/hsnsw/Publications/mothers-and-babies-2012.pdf [verified 27 October 2017].

[39]  Royal Society of Canada/Canadian Academy of Health Sciences Expert Panel. Early childhood development: adverse experiences and developmental health. Ottawa: Royal Society of Canada; 2012. Available at: http://www.skc-ecd.ca/documents/pdf/Rapports/ECD_Report_CAHS-SRC_2012-11_Final_Full.pdf [verified 27 October 2017].

[40]  Earls MF, Committee on Psychosocial Aspects of Child and Family Health American Academy of Pediatrics Incorporating recognition and management of perinatal and postpartum depression into pediatric practice. Pediatrics 2010; 126 1032–9.
Incorporating recognition and management of perinatal and postpartum depression into pediatric practice.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[41]  Sohr-Preston SL, Scaramella LV. Implications of timing of maternal depressive symptoms for early cognitive and language development. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev 2006; 9 65–83.
Implications of timing of maternal depressive symptoms for early cognitive and language development.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[42]  NSW Department of Health. Annual report 2008–09 NSW Health. 2009. Available at: http://www.health.nsw.gov.au/publications/Publications/Annual-Report-2008-09/annualreport-2008-2009.pdf [verified 27 October 2017].

[43]  Widdup J, Comino E, Webster V, Knight J. Universal for whom? Evaluating an urban Aboriginal population’s access to a mainstream universal health home visiting program. Aust Health Rev 2012; 36 27–33.
Universal for whom? Evaluating an urban Aboriginal population’s access to a mainstream universal health home visiting program.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[44]  Hart JT. The inverse care law. Lancet 1971; 297 405–12.
The inverse care law.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[45]  Vimpani G. Home visiting vulnerable infants in Australia. J Paediatr Child Health 2000; 36 537–9.
Home visiting vulnerable infants in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2Fps1Sktw%3D%3D&md5=e9d1d1480198fd63cbd56af269d7d205CAS |