Australian Mammalogy Australian Mammalogy Society
Journal of the Australian Mammal Society
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Examining interactions between dingoes (wild dogs) and mesopredators: the need for caution when interpreting summary data from previously published work

Andrew W. Claridge
+ Author Affliations
- Author Affliations

Office of Environment and Heritage, Parks and Wildlife Group, Planning and Assessment Team, Metropolitan and Mountains Branch, PO Box 733, Queanbeyan, NSW 2620, Australia, and School of Physical, Environmental and Mathematical Sciences, University of New South Wales, Australian Defence Force Academy, Northcott Drive, Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia. Email: andrew.claridge@environment.nsw.gov.au

Australian Mammalogy 35(2) 248-250 https://doi.org/10.1071/AM12026
Submitted: 19 May 2012  Accepted: 22 March 2013   Published: 17 May 2013

Abstract

Australian Mammalogy has recently published papers by Fleming et al. (2012) and Johnson and Ritchie (2013). While not diametrically opposed, these papers variously question the notion that wild dogs can help suppress and/or regulate the activity and abundance of foxes and feral cats. They examine the evidence, or lack thereof, for support of the hypothesis. In doing so, it is clear from both papers that (1) hard experimental data to support or refute the hypothesis are mostly lacking, and (2) supporting or refuting the hypothesis is largely contingent on analyses and reanalyses of correlative evidence. Johnson and Ritchie (2013) inadvertently misinterpreted the results of a third study but they were not privy to additional information from that work that does not support their view. The main purpose of this paper is to, first, point out that information, and, second, to argue that until further experimental work is conducted, continuing to define the role and relative importance of wild dogs in Australian landscapes and applying that knowledge in a management setting will be difficult.

Additional keywords: Biodiversity conservation, foxes, feral cats, pest animals.


References

Allen, L. (2005). The impact of wild dog predation and wild dog control on beef cattle production. Ph.D. Thesis. Department of Zoology, The University of Queensland.

Allen, L., Engeman, R., and Krupa, H. (1996). Evaluation of three relative abundance indices for assessing dingo abundance. Wildlife Research 23, 197–206.
Evaluation of three relative abundance indices for assessing dingo abundance.CrossRef | open url image1

Arthur, A. D., Catling, P. C., and Reid, A. (2012). Relative influence of habitat structure, species interactions and rainfall on the post-fire population dynamics of ground-dwelling vertebrates. Austral Ecology 37, 958–970.
Relative influence of habitat structure, species interactions and rainfall on the post-fire population dynamics of ground-dwelling vertebrates.CrossRef | open url image1

Claridge, A. W., Cunningham, R. B., Catling, P. C., and Reid, A. M. (2010). Trends in the activity levels of forest-dwelling vertebrate fauna against a background of intensive baiting for foxes. Forest Ecology and Management 260, 822–832.
Trends in the activity levels of forest-dwelling vertebrate fauna against a background of intensive baiting for foxes.CrossRef | open url image1

Daniels, M. J., and Corbett, L. K. (2003). Redefining introgressed protected mammals: when is a wildcat a wild cat and a dingo a wild dog? Wildlife Research 30, 213–218.
Redefining introgressed protected mammals: when is a wildcat a wild cat and a dingo a wild dog?CrossRef | open url image1

Dexter, N., and Murray, A. (2009). The impact of fox control on the relative abundance of forest mammals in East Gippsland, Victoria. Wildlife Research 36, 252–261.
The impact of fox control on the relative abundance of forest mammals in East Gippsland, Victoria.CrossRef | open url image1

Eldridge, S.R., Shakeshaft, B.J., and Nano, T.J. (2002). The impact of wild dog control on cattle, native and introduced herbivores and introduced predators in central Australia. Final report to the Bureau of Rural Sciences. Parks and Wildlife Commission of the Northern Territory, Alice Springs.

Engeman, R. M. (2005). Indexing principles and a widely applicable paradigm for indexing animal populations. Wildlife Research 32, 203–210.
Indexing principles and a widely applicable paradigm for indexing animal populations.CrossRef | open url image1

Fleming, P., Corbett, L., Harden, R., and Thomson, P. (2001). ‘Managing the Impacts of Dingoes and other Wild Dogs.’ (Bureau of Rural Science: Canberra.)

Fleming, P. J. S., Allen, B. L., and Ballard, G. A. (2012). Seven considerations about dingoes as biodiversity engineers: the socioecological niches of dogs in Australia. Australian Mammalogy 34, 119–131.
Seven considerations about dingoes as biodiversity engineers: the socioecological niches of dogs in Australia.CrossRef | open url image1

Johnson, C. N., and Ritchie, E. (2013). The dingo and biodiversity conservation: a response to Fleming et al. (2012). Australian Mammalogy 35, 8–14.
The dingo and biodiversity conservation: a response to Fleming et al. (2012).CrossRef | open url image1

Johnson, C. N., and Van der Wal, J. (2009). Evidence that dingoes limit abundance of a mesopredator in eastern Australian forests. Journal of Applied Ecology 46, 641–646.
Evidence that dingoes limit abundance of a mesopredator in eastern Australian forests.CrossRef | open url image1

Kennedy, M., Phillips, B., Legge, S., Murphy, S., and Faulkner, R. (2012). Do dingoes suppress the activity of cats in northern Australia? Austral Ecology 37, 134–139.
Do dingoes suppress the activity of cats in northern Australia?CrossRef | open url image1

Letnic, M., Ritchie, E. G., and Dickman, C. R. (2012). Top predators as biodiversity regulators: the dingo Canis lupus dingo as a case study. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 87, 390–413.
Top predators as biodiversity regulators: the dingo Canis lupus dingo as a case study.CrossRef | 22051057PubMed | open url image1

Mitchell, B. D., and Banks, P. B. (2005). Do wild dogs exclude foxes? Evidence for competition from dietary and spatial overlaps. Austral Ecology 30, 581–591.
Do wild dogs exclude foxes? Evidence for competition from dietary and spatial overlaps.CrossRef | open url image1

Moseby, K. E., Neilly, H., Read, J. L., and Crisp, H. (2012). Interactions between a top order predator and exotic mesopredators in the Australian rangelands. International Journal of Ecology , .
Interactions between a top order predator and exotic mesopredators in the Australian rangelands.CrossRef | open url image1

Newsome, A. E., Catling, P. C., and Corbett, L. K. (1983). The feeding ecology of the dingo. II. Dietary and numerical relationships with fluctuating prey populations in southeastern Australia. Australian Journal of Ecology 8, 345–366.
The feeding ecology of the dingo. II. Dietary and numerical relationships with fluctuating prey populations in southeastern Australia.CrossRef | open url image1

Pascoe, J. H., Mulley, R. C., Spencer, R., and Chapple, R. (2012). Diet analysis of mammals, raptors and reptiles in a complex predator assemblage in the Blue Mountains, eastern Australia. Australian Journal of Ecology 8, 345–366. open url image1

Stephens, D. (2011). The molecular ecology of Australian wild dogs: hybridisation, gene flow and genetic structure at multiple geographic scales. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Western Australia, Perth.

Wheeler, R., and Priddel, D. (2009). The impact of introduced predators on two threatened prey species: a case study from western New South Wales. Ecological Management & Restoration 10, S117–S123.
The impact of introduced predators on two threatened prey species: a case study from western New South Wales.CrossRef | open url image1

Xia, X., and Boonstra, R. (1992). Measuring temporal variation in population density: a critique. American Naturalist 140, 883–892.
Measuring temporal variation in population density: a critique.CrossRef | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1Mzjt1KhsQ%3D%3D&md5=a100817ae943277059b9dedbd57bda5eCAS | 19426047PubMed | open url image1



Export Citation Cited By (3)