Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE

A complementary forage system whole-farm study: forage utilisation and milk production

S. R. Fariña A C , S. C. Garcia A and W. J. Fulkerson B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A The Faculty of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney, Private Bag 3, Camden, NSW 2570, Australia.

B Wollongbar, NSW 2477, Australia.

C Corresponding author. Email: santiago.farina@intelact.com

Animal Production Science 51(5) 460-470 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN10242
Submitted: 27 October 2010  Accepted: 15 February 2011   Published: 5 May 2011

Abstract

Australian dairy farmers are facing decreasing availability of land and water and declining terms of trade. In this context, systems that are able to increase milk production per ha from home-grown feed, beyond the potential of pasture only, are sought. The complementary forage system (CFS), combining an area with a rotational sequence of two or three forage crops per year with an area of pasture in 35 and 65% of the farm area, respectively, was developed for this purpose. A 2-year whole-farm study with 100 milking cows on 21.5 ha evaluated the feasibility of achieving 25 t DM/ha.year of home-grown feed and converting this into 35 000 L of milk/ha.year by the implementation of such CFS. Utilisation and nutritive value of all forages and milk yields of individual cows were measured daily, body condition and bodyweight weekly, and milk composition fortnightly. Over 26 t DM/ha.year was utilised over the whole CFS farm for the 2 years of the study. This utilised forage had a mean metabolisable energy value of 10.2 MJ/kg DM and crude protein content of 20.5% DM. From this, a total yield of 27 835 L of milk/ha.year from home-grown feed was obtained, which is higher than any other whole-farm study reported in the literature. Daily pasture intake was the variable with the highest impact on milk yield, and significant differences were found in body condition and milk yield of cows calving in either autumn or spring. This study warrants further investigation to determine the environmental and economic sustainability of the implementation of the CFS.

Additional keywords: forage rape, grass, intensification, kikuyu, maize, rotation.


References

ABARE (2009) ‘Financial performance of dairy producing farms 2006–07 to 2008–09. Commonwealth of Australia 2009.’ (ABARE: Canberra)

Beca DA (2008) ‘Tri-nations revisited: profitability variations between the average and the best in South Africa, Australia and New Zealand.’ (Red Sky Agricultural: Warrnambool, Vic.)

Beever DE, Doyle PT (2007) Feed conversion efficiency as a key determinant of dairy herd performance: a review. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 47, 645–657.
Feed conversion efficiency as a key determinant of dairy herd performance: a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Beever DE, Losada HR, Camwell SB, Evans RT, Haynes MJ (1986) Effect of forage species and season on nutrient digestion and supply in grazing cattle. The British Journal of Nutrition 56, 209–225.
Effect of forage species and season on nutrient digestion and supply in grazing cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaL28XkslOqsL4%3D&md5=4607ccb19abc818f16ffd73f9ef98ea9CAS | 3676197PubMed |

Chapman DF, Hill J, Tharmaraj J, Jacobs JL, Beca D, Grendon R, Watson L, Fergusson A (2007) Effects of complementary forages on productivity and profit of dairy systems in southwest Victoria, Australia. In ‘Proceedings of the Australasian Dairy Science Symposium 2007’. (Eds DF Chapman, DA Clark, KL Macmillan, DP Nation) pp. 526–534. (National Dairy Alliance: Melbourne)

Chataway RG, Walker RG, Callow MN (2010) Development of profitable milk production systems for northern Australia: a field assessment of the productivity of five potential farming systems using farmlets. Animal Production Science 50, 246–264.
Development of profitable milk production systems for northern Australia: a field assessment of the productivity of five potential farming systems using farmlets.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Earle D (1976) A guide to scoring dairy cow condition. Journal of Agriculture, Victoria 74, 228–231.

Earle DF, McGowan AA (1979) Evaluation and calibration of an automated rising plate meter for estimating dry matter yield of pasture. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 19, 337–343.
Evaluation and calibration of an automated rising plate meter for estimating dry matter yield of pasture.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Edwards NJ, Parker WJ (1994) Increasing per cow milk solids production in a pasture-based dairy system by manipulating the diet: a review. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 54, 267–274.

Fariña SR, Garcia SC, Fulkerson WJ, Barchia IM (2011) Pasture-based dairy farm systems increasing milk production through stocking rate or milk yield per cow: pasture and animal responses. Grass and Forage Science, in press.

Fulkerson WJ, Donaghy DJ (2001) Plant-soluble carbohydrate reserves and senescence – key criteria for developing an effective grazing management system for ryegrass-based pastures: a review. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 41, 261–275.
Plant-soluble carbohydrate reserves and senescence – key criteria for developing an effective grazing management system for ryegrass-based pastures: a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXjslKltbo%3D&md5=01c818d1789e6ac90437f6ef7796074eCAS |

Fulkerson WJ, Doyle PT (2001) ‘The Australian dairy industry.’ (Victorian Department of National Resources and Environment: Melbourne)

Fulkerson WJ, Dobos R, Michell P (1986) Relationship between predicted energy requirements and measured energy intake of dairy cattle at pasture. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 26, 523–526.
Relationship between predicted energy requirements and measured energy intake of dairy cattle at pasture.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Fulkerson WJ, Franks DR, Michell P (1987) ‘Comparison of autumn and spring calving management strategies.’ (Tasmanian Department of Agriculture: Elliot)

Fulkerson WJ, Davison TM, Garcia SC, Hough G, Goddard ME, Dobos R, Blockey M (2008) Holstein-Friesian dairy cows under a predominantly grazing system: interaction between genotype and environment. Journal of Dairy Science 91, 826–839.
Holstein-Friesian dairy cows under a predominantly grazing system: interaction between genotype and environment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXhsVaitL4%3D&md5=ef7996f8f7db013545994bde31f3b74cCAS | 18218771PubMed |

Garcia SC (2000) Systems, components and modelling studies of pasture-based dairy systems in which the cows calve at different times of the year. PhD Thesis, Massey University, New Zealand.

Garcia SC, Fulkerson WJ (2005) Opportunities for future Australian dairy systems: a review. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 45, 1041–1055.
Opportunities for future Australian dairy systems: a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Garcia SC, Holmes CW (2005) Seasonality of calving in pasture-based dairy systems: its effects on herbage production, utilisation and dry matter intake. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 45, 1–9.
Seasonality of calving in pasture-based dairy systems: its effects on herbage production, utilisation and dry matter intake.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Garcia SC, Cayzer FJ, Holmes CW, Macdonald KA (1998) The effect of calving season on milk production. A system study. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 58, 61–63.

Garcia SC, Jacobs JL, Woodward SL, Clark DA (2007) Complementary forage rotation systems: a review of recent developments. In ‘Proceedings of the Australasian Dairy Science Symposium 2007’. (Eds DF Chapman, DA Clark, KL Macmillan, DP Nation) pp. 221–239. (National Dairy Alliance: Melbourne)

Garcia SC, Fulkerson WJ, Brookes SU (2008) Dry matter production, nutritive value and efficiency of nutrient utilization of a complementary forage rotation compared to a grass pasture system. Grass and Forage Science 63, 284–300.
Dry matter production, nutritive value and efficiency of nutrient utilization of a complementary forage rotation compared to a grass pasture system.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXht1ait73N&md5=e6c5168fc0f4be2d623a209e5c8f3b74CAS |

Glassey CB (2009) ‘Prototype farms for dairy farming future (Stage 2).’ (DairyNZ: Hamilton)

Hansen EM, Kristensen K, Djurhuus J (2000) Yield parameters as affected by introduction or discontinuation of catch crop use. Agronomy Journal 92, 909–914.
Yield parameters as affected by introduction or discontinuation of catch crop use.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Holmes CW, Roche JR (2007) Pastures and supplements in dairy production systems. In ‘Pasture and supplements for grazing animals’. (Eds PV Rattray, IM Brookes, AM Nicol) pp. 221–242. (New Zealand Society of Animal Production: Hamilton)

Isbell RF (2002) ‘Australian soil classification.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne)

Kabore B (2008) Investigations into soil nutrient and change in soil physical characteristics under a complementary forage rotation in comparison to pasture systems for dairy cows. MSc. Thesis, The University of Sydney, Australia.

Kolver ES (2007) Definitions and concepts of feed conversion efficiency and prospects of manipulation. In ‘Proceedings of the Australasian Dairy Science Symposium 2007’. (Eds DF Chapman, DA Clark, KL Macmillan, DP Nation) pp. 36–64. (National Dairy Alliance: Melbourne)

Linehan CJ, Armstrong DP, Doyle PT, Johnson F (2004) A survey of water use efficiency on irrigated dairy farms in northern Victoria. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 44, 131–136.
A survey of water use efficiency on irrigated dairy farms in northern Victoria.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Macdonald KA, Penno JW (1998) Management decision rules to optimise milksolids production on dairy farms. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 58, 132–135.

Macdonald KA, Penno JW, Lancaster JAS, Roche JR (2008) Effect of stocking rate on pasture production, milk production, and reproduction of dairy cows in pasture-based systems. Journal of Dairy Science 91, 2151–2163.
Effect of stocking rate on pasture production, milk production, and reproduction of dairy cows in pasture-based systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXltlWlsr4%3D&md5=2c5a6b54f3a0f17e230a006b3172b0e4CAS | 18420647PubMed |

Mackle TR, Parr CR, Stakelum GK, Bryant AM, MacMillan KL (1996) Feed conversion efficiency, daily pasture intake, and milk production of primiparous Friesian and Jersey cows calved at two different liveweights. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 39, 357–370.
Feed conversion efficiency, daily pasture intake, and milk production of primiparous Friesian and Jersey cows calved at two different liveweights.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

MAFF (1975) ‘Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries for Scotland: energy allowances and feeding systems for ruminants.’ (HMSO: London)

Payne RW, Murray DA, Harding SA, Baird DB, Soutar DM (2008) ‘Genstat for Windows. 11th edition. Introduction.’ (VSN International: Hemel Hempstead, UK)

Rawnsley RP, Donaghy DJ, Stevens DR (2007) What is limiting production and consumption of perennial ryegrass in temperate dairy regions of Australia and New Zealand? In ‘Proceedings of the Australasian Dairy Science Symposium 2007’. (Eds DF Chapman, DA Clark, KL Macmillan, DP Nation) pp. 256–274. (National Dairy Alliance: Melbourne)

Reeves M, Fulkerson WJ, Kellaway RC (1996a) Production responses of dairy cows grazing well-managed kikuyu (Pennisetum clandestinum) pastures to energy and protein supplementation. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 36, 763–770.
Production responses of dairy cows grazing well-managed kikuyu (Pennisetum clandestinum) pastures to energy and protein supplementation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Reeves M, Fulkerson WJ, Kellaway RC (1996b) Forage quality of kikuyu (Pennisetum clandestinum): the effect of time of defoliation and nitrogen fertiliser application and in comparison with perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne). Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 47, 1349–1359.
Forage quality of kikuyu (Pennisetum clandestinum): the effect of time of defoliation and nitrogen fertiliser application and in comparison with perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

SCA (1990) ‘Feeding standards for Australian livestock. Ruminants.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne)

Shrestha P (2007) Studies on double crop complementary forage rotations as forage options for dairy production systems. MSc Thesis, The University of Sydney, Australia.

Shrestha P, Garcia SC, Fulkerson WJ, Horadagoda A, Barchia I (2006) Double crop complementary forage rotation – a sustainable forage option. In ‘Proceedings of the Symposium of the Dairy Research Foundation’. (Ed. WJ Fulkerson) pp. 136–138. (National Dairy Alliance: Melbourne)

Smith D (1969) ‘Removing and analyzing total nonstructural carbohydrates from plant tissue.’ (Wisconsin College of Agricultural Life Sciences: Madison, WI)

Spain G (2005) Producing over 20 t DM/ha from ryegrass. In ‘Proceedings of the Symposium of the Dairy Research Foundation’. (Ed. WJ Fulkerson) pp. 60–63. (National Dairy Alliance: Melbourne)

Thorrold B, Doyle PT (2007) Nature or nurture – forces shaping the current and future state of dairy farming in New Zealand and Australia. In ‘Proceedings of the Australasian Dairy Science Symposium 2007’. (Eds DF Chapman, DA Clark, KL Macmillan, DP Nation) pp. 450–460. (National Dairy Alliance: Melbourne)

Tilley JMA, Terry RA (1963) A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. Journal of the British Grassland Society 18, 104–111.
A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaF3sXks1Cmurk%3D&md5=3fce64138ad7541fff0cd15d7f86f33eCAS |

Tyrrell HF, Reid JT (1965) Prediction of the energy value of cow’s milk. Journal of Dairy Science 48, 1215–1223.
Prediction of the energy value of cow’s milk.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaF28%2FktVOjtA%3D%3D&md5=e5448eacf3d901ce61efe2072bdf54b6CAS | 5843077PubMed |

Valentine S, Lewis P, Cowan RT, DeFaveri J (2009) The effects of high stocking rates on milk production from dryland and irrigated Mediterranean pastures. Animal Production Science 49, 100–111.
The effects of high stocking rates on milk production from dryland and irrigated Mediterranean pastures.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA (1991) Methods of dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 3583–3597.
Methods of dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK38%2FnvVCltA%3D%3D&md5=42d2516f43d4e2cba84245d95aa39583CAS | 1660498PubMed |