Breed effects and heterosis for productivity traits at first calving of Angus, Holstein Friesian, Jersey and crossbred beef cowsR. E. Hickson A B , N. Lopez-Villalobos A , P. R. Kenyon A and S. T. Morris A
A Institute of Veterinary, Animal and Biomedical Sciences, College of Sciences, Massey University, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand.
B Corresponding author. Email: email@example.com
Animal Production Science 54(9) 1381-1387 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN14223
Submitted: 12 March 2014 Accepted: 29 May 2014 Published: 14 July 2014
Feed requirements for maintenance contribute a large proportion of the feed requirements of a beef cow so lighter cows may be more efficient producers of weaned calves, provided that such cows do not result in a comparative reduction in calf weaning weight. Beef-cross-dairy cows have increased milk yield compared with straight-bred beef cows and have the potential to wean heavier calves. Crossbred cows may also offer potential increases in production through heterosis. This experiment examined the performance of straight-bred Angus (AA), Holstein Friesian (FF) and Jersey (JJ) cows and of Angus-sired F1 crossbreds with Holstein Friesian (AF), Jersey (AJ) and Holstein Friesian-cross-Jersey (Kiwicross; AK) cows to identify breed and heterosis effects on milk intake and liveweight of calves and liveweight, reproductive performance and fatness of cows in their first lactation. Days to calving and weaning rate from first joining were similar among genotypes, but only 50% of FF cows conceived to second joining, compared with 90–98% for the other genotypes (P < 0.05). Estimated milk intake of calves was least (P < 0.05) for calves born to AA cows, and was generally similar (P > 0.05) among calves born to crossbred cows. There were positive heterosis effects between Angus and Jersey and between Angus and Holstein Friesian on milk intake of the calf. Straight-bred FF cows weaned the heaviest calves (least-squares mean + s.e.: 241 ± 5 kg; P < 0.05). Calves born to AF and AK cows were weaned at similar liveweight (229 ± 3 kg and 226 ± 4 kg, respectively; P > 0.05), and were heavier (P < 0.05) than calves born to JJ and AJ cows, which were similar (208 ± 5 kg and 215 ± 3 kg, respectively; P > 0.05). Calves born to AA cows were lightest at weaning (196 ± 3 kg; P < 0.05). Estimates of heterosis for weaning weight were 11 ± 4 kg (P < 0.01) between Angus and Holstein Friesian, and 14 ± 4 kg (P < 0.001) between Angus and Jersey. Angus-cross-dairy cows offered production advantages over straight-bred AA cows as dam lines in a terminal cross. These advantages were partially due to heterosis.
Additional keywords: birthweight, body condition score, calving percentage, liveweight, milk intake.
ReferencesArango JA, Cundiff LV, Van Vleck LD (2002) Breed comparisons of Angus, Charolais, Hereford, Jersey, Limousin, Simmental and South Devon for weight, weight adjusted for body condition score, height, and body condition score of cows. Journal of Animal Science 80, 3123–3132.
Arthur PF, Hearnshaw H, Barlow R, Williamson PJ, Stephenson PD, Dibley K (1997) Evaluation of Hereford and first-cross cows on three pasture systems. III. Milk yield and its influence on calf performance. The Journal of Agricultural Science 129, 91–98.
| Evaluation of Hereford and first-cross cows on three pasture systems. III. Milk yield and its influence on calf performance.CrossRef |
Chagas LM, Bass JJ, Blache D, Burke CR, Kay JK, Lindsay DR, Lucy MC, Martin GB, Meier S, Rhodes FM, Roche JR, Thatcher WW, Webb R (2007) Invited review: new perspectives on the roles of nutrition and metabolic priorities in the subfertility of high-producing dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 4022–4032.
| Invited review: new perspectives on the roles of nutrition and metabolic priorities in the subfertility of high-producing dairy cows.CrossRef | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXpsleqtb0%3D&md5=347bc391cfd101e2035547d184cd9381CAS | 17699018PubMed |
Cundiff LV, Gregory KE, Schwulst FJ, Koch RM (1974) Effects of heterosis on maternal performance and milk production in Hereford, Angus and Shorthorn cattle. Journal of Animal Science 38, 728–745.
Gregory KE, Cundiff LV (1980) Crossbreeding in beef cattle: evaluation of systems. Journal of Animal Science 51, 1224–1242.
Hickson RE, Morris ST, Kenyon PR, Lopez-Villalobos N (2006) Dystocia in beef heifers: a review of genetic and nutritional influences. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 54, 256–264.
| Dystocia in beef heifers: a review of genetic and nutritional influences.CrossRef | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD28jhtlyhuw%3D%3D&md5=29188fb2399c3472bcc1be1863bccdffCAS | 17151722PubMed |
Hickson RE, Kenyon PR, Lopez-Villalobos N, Morris ST (2009) Effects of liveweight gain of 15-month-old Angus heifers during the first trimester of pregnancy on liveweight and milk intake of their calves. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 52, 39–46.
| Effects of liveweight gain of 15-month-old Angus heifers during the first trimester of pregnancy on liveweight and milk intake of their calves.CrossRef |
Hickson RE Balcomb CC Fraser KR Lopez-Villalobos N Kenyon PR Morris ST 2011
LIC (1999) (1998/1999) ‘New Zealand dairy statistics.’ (Livestock Improvement Corporation: Hamilton, New Zealand)
LIC and Dairy NZ (2012) ‘New Zealand dairy statistics 2011–12.’ (Livestock Improvement Corporation and DairyNZ: Hamilton, New Zealand)
Mallinckrodt CH, Bourdon RM, Golden BL, Schalles RR, Odde KG (1993) Relationship of maternal milk expected progeny differences to actual milk yield and calf weaning weight. Journal of Animal Science 71, 355–362.
Marston TT, Simms DD, Schalles RR, Zoellner KO, Martin LC, Fink GM (1992) Relationship of milk production, milk expected progeny difference, and calf weaning weight in Angus and Simmental cow-calf pairs. Journal of Animal Science 70, 3304–3310.
Morris ST (2013) Presidential address 2012 – the New Zealand beef cattle industry. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 73, 1–4.
Morris CA, Cullen NG, Carson PA, Morley GA (1985) Differences among and within crossbred beef cow groups in body condition and liveweight. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 45, 167–169.
Morris CA, Baker RL, Carter AH, Cullen NG, Amyes NC, Hickey SM (1993) Evaluation of two-breed composites alongside Angus or Hereford controls for growth, reproduction, maternal, and carcass traits. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 36, 327–340.
| Evaluation of two-breed composites alongside Angus or Hereford controls for growth, reproduction, maternal, and carcass traits.CrossRef |
Roche JF, Dillon PG, Stockdale CR, Baumgard LH, VanBaale MJ (2004) Relationships among international body condition scoring systems. Journal of Dairy Science 87, 3076–3079.
| Relationships among international body condition scoring systems.CrossRef | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXntlGjtrc%3D&md5=3b4d3a92f4cc15e4d6b8f5d9ea3bf8d5CAS |
Rutledge JJ, Robison OW, Ahlschwede WT, Legates JE (1971) Milk yield and its influence on 205-day weight in beef calves. Journal of Animal Science 33, 563–567.