Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Practical aspects of a genetic evaluation system using parentage assigned from genetic markers

K. G. Dodds A C , J. A. Sise A and M. L. Tate B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A AgResearch, Invermay Agricultural Centre, Private Bag 50034, Mosgiel, New Zealand.

B Ovita Ltd, PO Box 5520, Dunedin, New Zealand.

C Corresponding author. Email: ken.dodds@agresearch.co.nz

Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 45(8) 935-940 https://doi.org/10.1071/EA05056
Submitted: 9 February 2005  Accepted: 27 May 2005   Published: 26 August 2005

Abstract

Animal breeding values can be calculated when genetic markers have been used to help determine the parentage of some of the animals, but their parentage has been incompletely determined. The pedigree sampling method is 1 computing strategy for calculating these breeding values. This paper describes and discusses methods for dealing with a number of practical issues that arise when implementing such a system for industry use. In particular, diagnostic systems for detecting inadequacies or possible errors in the genotyping systems and the recording of animal management are developed. Also, characteristics of the best assigned pedigrees are calculated according to mating group and used to check for sires missing from these groups. The correlation between breeding values estimated from a single sampled pedigree (using parentage probabilities) and those estimated as the mean from many sampled pedigrees gives a diagnostic to indicate which estimated breeding values are more influenced by uncertainties in relationships. For the analysis of survival traits, a method to enumerate and assign likely parentage to dead offspring which have not been DNA sampled and genotyped is described. When embryo transfer technology is used, the genetic dam needs to be included as a possible dam when considering parentage. If some fixed effects which depend on the parent are missing, these can be sampled similarly to parentage, and this may improve the evaluation if certain assumptions are met. A method to provide a likely list of parents, the ‘fitted pedigree’, which is based on the most likely parents, but modified to reduce the occurrence of unlikely family sets (e.g. very large litters) is also presented. The use of these methods will enhance the practical application of DNA parenting when used in conjunction with genetic evaluation.

Additional keywords: breeding value, animal breeding, DNA marker, pedigree, incomplete pedigree.


References


DeYoung RW, Demarais S, Gonzales RA, Honeycutt RL, Gee KL (2002) Multiple paternity in white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) revealed by DNA microsatellites. Journal of Mammalogy 83, 884.
Crossref |
open url image1

Dodds KG, Tate ML, Sise JA (2005) Genetic evaluation using parentage information from genetic markers. Journal of Animal Science in press 83,
PubMed |
open url image1

Hohenboken WD, Clarke JN, Rattray PV, Smith JF, Wheeler M (1988) Southdown versus Suffolk sire breed effects on numbers and traits of crossbred lambs. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 31, 365–368. open url image1

Marshall TC, Slate J, Kruuk LEB, Pemberton JM (1998) Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Molecular Ecology 7, 639–655.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Perez-Enciso M, Bidanel JP (1997) Selection for litter size components — a critical review. Genetics, Selection, Evolution 29, 483–496. open url image1