Register      Login
Australian Journal of Chemistry Australian Journal of Chemistry Society
An international journal for chemical science
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Synthesis and Characterization of New N-Alkylamino-3,5-diphenylpyrazole Ligands and Reactivity Toward PdII and PtII. Study of the cis–trans Isomerization

Gemma Aragay A , Josefina Pons A D , Vicenç Branchadell B , Jordi García-Antón A , Xavier Solans C E , Mercé Font-Bardía C and Josep Ros A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Departament de Química, Unitat de Química Inorgànica, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193-Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain.

B Departament de Química, Unitat de Química Física, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193-Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain.

C Cristal·lografia, Mineralogia i Dipòsits Minerals, Universitat de Barcelona, Martí i Franqués s/n, 08028-Barcelona, Spain.

D Corresponding author. Email: josefina.pons@uab.es

E Deceased 3 September 2007.

Australian Journal of Chemistry 63(2) 257-269 https://doi.org/10.1071/CH09371
Submitted: 1 July 2009  Accepted: 4 August 2009   Published: 26 February 2010

Abstract

In this paper, the synthesis and characterization of two new N-alkylaminopyrazole ligands, 1-[2-(ethylamino)ethyl]-3,5-diphenylpyrazole (dpea) and 1-[2-(octylamino)ethyl]-3,5-diphenylpyrazole (dpoa) are reported. The reaction of these ligands with [MCl2(CH3CN)2] (M = PdII, PtII) affords the following square planar complexes: cis-[MCl2(NN′)] (M = PdII: NN′ = dpea, 1; dpoa, 2; M = PtII: NN′ = dpea, 3; dpoa, 4). Reaction of [PdCl2(CH3CN)2] and dpea or dpoa in 1:2 M:NN′ molar ratio, in the presence of NaBF4, yields complexes [Pd(NN′)2](BF4)2 (NN′ = dpea, [5](BF4)2); dpoa, [6](BF4)2). The solid-state structures of complexes 1, 3, and [5](BF4)2 have been determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction methods. In complexes 1 and 3, the dpea ligand is coordinated through the Npz and Namino atoms to the metallic centre, which completes its coordination with two chlorine atoms in a cis disposition. For complex [5](BF4)2, the crystal structure consists of cations involving a [Pd(Npz)2(Namino)2]2+ core with a cis disposition of the two dpea ligands in a square-planar geometry and BF4 anions. Theoretical calculations were carried out to optimize the geometries of the cis and trans isomers of the [Pd(dpea)2]2+ cation and of the [Pd(dpea)2](BF4)2 complex. The results show that the trans isomer is the most stable for [Pd(dpea)2]2+, in contrast with the cis stereochemistry observed in the crystal structure of [Pd(dpea)2](BF4)2. The calculations also predict that in acetonitrile solution, the dissociation of this complex into the corresponding ions is thermodynamically favourable. The cistrans isomerization process of [Pd(dpea)2]2+ in acetonitrile solution has been studied by NMR spectroscopy at different temperatures. These experimental results confirm that the trans isomer is the thermodynamically most stable form of the complexes [5](BF4)2 and [6](BF4)2.


Acknowledgements

Support by the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (projects CTQ2007–63913/BQU and CTQ2007–61704/BQU) and allowance of computer resources from the Centre de Supercomputació de Catalunya supercomputing centre are gratefully acknowledged.


References


[1]   (a) F. Abraham, M. Lagrenee, S. Sueur, B. Mernari, C. Bremard, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1991,  1443.
        | Crossref |  GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |  
        | Crossref |  GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |  
        | Crossref |  GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |  
        | Crossref |  GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |  
        | Crossref |  GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |  
        | Crossref |  GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |  
        | Crossref |  GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |  
        | Crossref |  GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |  
        | Crossref |  GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |  
        | Crossref |  GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |  
        | Crossref |  GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |  
        | Crossref |  GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |  
        | Crossref |  GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |  
        | Crossref |  GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |  
        | Crossref |  GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |  
        | Crossref |  GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |  
        | Crossref |  GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |  
        | Crossref |  GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |  
        | Crossref |  GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |  
        | Crossref |  GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |  
        | Crossref |  GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |  
        | Crossref |  GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |  
        | Crossref |  GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |  
        | Crossref |  GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |  
        | Crossref |  GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |  
        | Crossref |  GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |  
        | Crossref |  GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |  
        | Crossref |  GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |  
        | Crossref |  GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |  
        | Crossref |  GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |  
        | Crossref |  GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |  
        | Crossref |  GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |  
        | Crossref |  GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |  
        | Crossref |  GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |  
        | Crossref |  GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |  
        | Crossref |  GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |  
        | Crossref |  GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |  
        | Crossref |  GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |  
        | Crossref |  GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |  
        | Crossref |  GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |  
        | Crossref |  GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |  
        | Crossref |  GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |  
        | Crossref |  GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |  
        | Crossref |  GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |  
        | Crossref |  GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |  
        | Crossref |  GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |  
        | Crossref |  GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |  
        | Crossref |  GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |  
        | Crossref |  GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |  
        | Crossref |  GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |  
        | Crossref |  GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |  
        | Crossref |  GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |  
        | Crossref |  GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |  
        | Crossref |  GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |  
        | Crossref |  GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |  
        | Crossref |  GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |  
        | Crossref |  GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |  
        | Crossref |  GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |  
         
        | Crossref |  GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |  
        | Crossref |  GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |  
        | Crossref |  GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |  
        | Crossref |  GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |  
        | Crossref |  GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |  
        | Crossref |  GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |  
        | Crossref |  GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |  
        | Crossref |  GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |  
        | Crossref |  GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |  
        | Crossref |  GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |  
        | Crossref |  GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |  
        | Crossref |  GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |  
        | Crossref |  GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |  
        | Crossref |  GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |  
        | Crossref |  GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |  
        | Crossref |  GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |  
        | Crossref |  GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |  
        | Crossref |  GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |  
        | Crossref |  GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |  
        | Crossref |  GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |  
         
        | Crossref |  GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |  
        | Crossref |  GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |  
        | Crossref |  GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |  
        | Crossref |  GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |  open url image1