Register      Login
Crop and Pasture Science Crop and Pasture Science Society
Plant sciences, sustainable farming systems and food quality
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Performance of lucerne genotypes for biomass production and nitrogen content differs in monoculture and in mixture with grasses and is partly predicted from traits recorded on isolated plants

Amel Maamouri A , Gaëtan Louarn A , Vincent Béguier B and Bernadette Julier A C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A P3F, INRA, F-86600 Lusignan, France.

B Jouffray-Drillaud, La Litière, F-86600 Saint-Sauvant, France.

C Corresponding author. Email: bernadette.julier@inra.fr

Crop and Pasture Science 68(11) 942-951 https://doi.org/10.1071/CP17052
Submitted: 8 February 2017  Accepted: 25 April 2017   Published: 6 June 2017

Abstract

Grass–legume mixtures are key crops to improve agricultural sustainability. Despite their significant use in mixture, lucerne (Medicago sativa L.) varieties are mostly tested and bred for monocultures. This study was performed to evaluate whether the ranking of lucerne genotypes for biomass components and quality was similar in monoculture and mixture, and whether traits recorded on isolated plants could help to predict performance in monoculture and mixture. For 46 genotypes planted in the three competition conditions, plant biomass, shoot height, shoot number and protein content were recorded. In addition, maximum leaf size, internode length, stem diameter, growth habit, specific leaf area and leaf dry-matter content were measured on isolated plants. A general positive correlation was observed between the performance of genotypes in monoculture and in mixture. However, significant changes in genotype ranking indicated that the species of its neighbours could modify the relative performance of a genotype. The traits that minimised competition intensity also changed according to the neighbour species. In mixture, competition intensity was highest for plants with long internodes, a high shoot number and a non-erect growth habit. In monoculture, plants with long internodes and larges leaves suffered less from competition. The agronomic performance of lucerne varieties differing in their architecture should be compared in monoculture and mixture to finally identify the traits to be phenotyped to improve lucerne variety performance in both cultivation modes.

Additional keywords: alfalfa, forage.


References

Anglade J, Billen G, Garnier J (2015) Relationships for estimating N2 fixation in legumes: incidence for N balance of legume-based cropping systems in Europe. Ecosphere 6, art37
Relationships for estimating N2 fixation in legumes: incidence for N balance of legume-based cropping systems in Europe.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Annicchiarico P (2003) Breeding white clover for increased ability to compete with associated grasses. The Journal of Agricultural Science 140, 255–266.
Breeding white clover for increased ability to compete with associated grasses.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Annicchiarico P (2006) Diversity, genetic structure, distinctness and agronomic value of Italian lucerne (Medicago sativa L.) landraces. Euphytica 148, 269–282.
Diversity, genetic structure, distinctness and agronomic value of Italian lucerne (Medicago sativa L.) landraces.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Annicchiarico P, Proietti S (2010) White clover selected for enhanced competitive ability widens the compatibility with grasses and favours the optimization of legume content and forage yield in mown clover-grass mixtures. Grass and Forage Science 65, 318–324.
White clover selected for enhanced competitive ability widens the compatibility with grasses and favours the optimization of legume content and forage yield in mown clover-grass mixtures.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Annicchiarico P, Piano E, Rhodes I (1999) Heritability of, and genetic correlations among, forage and seed yield traits in Ladino white clover. Plant Breeding 118, 341–346.
Heritability of, and genetic correlations among, forage and seed yield traits in Ladino white clover.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Baldissera TC, Frak E, Carvalho PCD, Louarn G (2014) Plant development controls leaf area expansion in alfalfa plants competing for light. Annals of Botany 113, 145–157.
Plant development controls leaf area expansion in alfalfa plants competing for light.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Barnes D, Heichel G, Vance C, Peaden R (1990) Registration of ‘Ineffective Agate’ and ‘Ineffective Saranac’ non-N2-fixing alfalfa germplasms. Crop Science 30, 752–753.

Bolaños-Aguilar ED, Huyghe C, Julier B, Ecalle C (2000) Genetic variation for seed yield and its components in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) populations. Agronomie 20, 333–345.
Genetic variation for seed yield and its components in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) populations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Chamblee DS, Collins M (1988) Relationships with other species in a mixture. In ‘Alfalfa and alfalfa improvement’. (Eds AA Hanson, DK Barnes, RR Hill) pp. 439–461. (ASA: Madison, WI, USA)

Charles JP, Lehmann J (1989) Intérêt des mélanges de graminées et de légumineuses pour la production fourragère en Suisse. Fourrages 119, 311–320.

Cornelissen JHC, Lavorel S, Garnier E, Diaz S, Buchmann N, Gurvich DE, Reich PB, ter Steege H, Morgan HD, van der Heijden MGA, Pausas JG, Poorter H (2003) A handbook of protocols for standardised and easy measurement of plant functional traits worldwide. Australian Journal of Botany 51, 335–380.
A handbook of protocols for standardised and easy measurement of plant functional traits worldwide.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

da Silva MS, Tremblay GF, Belanger G, Lajeunesse J, Papadopoulos YA, Fillmore SAE, Jobim CC (2013) Energy to protein ratio of grass–legume binary mixtures under frequent clipping. Agronomy Journal 105, 482–492.
Energy to protein ratio of grass–legume binary mixtures under frequent clipping.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Davies A (2001) Competition between grasses and legumes in established pastures. In ‘Competition and succession in pastures’. (Eds PG Tow, A Lazenby) pp. 63–83. (CABI Publishing: Wallingford, UK)

De Wit CT, van den Bergh JP (1965) Competition between herbage plants. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 13, 212–221.

Donald CM (1963) Competition among crop and pasture plants. Advances in Agronomy 15, 1–118.
Competition among crop and pasture plants.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Faverjon L, Escobar-Gutiérrez A, Litrico I, Louarn G (2017) A conserved shoot developmental framework applies to legume species with contrasting morphogenetic strategies. Frontiers in Plant Science 8, 405
A conserved shoot developmental framework applies to legume species with contrasting morphogenetic strategies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Fyfe JL, Rogers HH (1965) Effects of varying variety and spacing on yields and composition of mixtures of lucerne and tall fescue. The Journal of Agricultural Science 64, 351–359.
Effects of varying variety and spacing on yields and composition of mixtures of lucerne and tall fescue.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

GEVES (1975) ‘Bulletin des variétés, plantes fourragères.’ (INRA: Versailles, France)

Harris W (2001) Formulation of pasture seed mixtures with reference to competition and succession in pastures. In ‘Competition and succession in pastures’. (Eds PG Tow, A Lazenby) pp. 149–174. (CABI Publishing: Wallingford, UK)

Heichel GH, Henjum KI (1991) Dinitrogen fixation, nitrogen transfer, and productivity of forage legume-grass communities. Crop Science 31, 202–208.
Dinitrogen fixation, nitrogen transfer, and productivity of forage legume-grass communities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK3MXitVKjtLY%3D&md5=255f834b6c3b79667bf99c35bbd3eed3CAS |

Huyghe C, De Vliegher A, Van Gils B, Peeters A (2014) ‘Grassland and herbivore production in Europe and effects of common policies.’ (Editions Quae: Versailles, France)

Julier B, Huyghe C, Ecalle C (2000) Within- and among-cultivar genetic variation in alfalfa: forage quality, morphology, and yield. Crop Science 40, 365–369.
Within- and among-cultivar genetic variation in alfalfa: forage quality, morphology, and yield.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kirwan L, Luescher A, Sebastia MT, Finn JA, Collins RP, Porqueddu C, Helgadottir A, Baadshaug OH, Brophy C, Coran C, Dalmannsdottir S, Delgado I, Elgersma A, Fothergill M, Frankow-Lindberg BE, Golinski P, Grieu P, Gustavsson AM, Hoglind M, Huguenin-Elie O, Iliadis C, Jorgensen M, Kadziuliene Z, Karyotis T, Lunnan T, Malengier M, Maltoni S, Meyer V, Nyfeler D, Nykanen-Kurki P, Parente J, Smit HJ, Thumm U, Connolly J (2007) Evenness drives consistent diversity effects in intensive grassland systems across 28 European sites. Journal of Ecology 95, 530–539.
Evenness drives consistent diversity effects in intensive grassland systems across 28 European sites.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lamb JFS, Sheaffer CC, Rhodes LH, Sulc RM, Undersander DJ, Brummer EC (2006) Five decades of alfalfa cultivar improvement: Impact on forage yield, persistence, and nutritive value. Crop Science 46, 902–909.
Five decades of alfalfa cultivar improvement: Impact on forage yield, persistence, and nutritive value.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lemaire G, Wilkins R, Hodgson J (2005) Challenges for grassland science: managing research priorities. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 108, 99–108.
Challenges for grassland science: managing research priorities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Louarn G, Pereira-Lopès E, Fustec J, Mary B, Voisin A-S, de Faccio Carvalho PC, Gastal F (2015) The amounts and dynamics of nitrogen transfer to grasses differ in alfalfa and white clover-based grass-legume mixtures as a result of rooting strategies and rhizodeposit quality. Plant and Soil 389, 289–305.
The amounts and dynamics of nitrogen transfer to grasses differ in alfalfa and white clover-based grass-legume mixtures as a result of rooting strategies and rhizodeposit quality.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2cXitFCrur%2FI&md5=0a236cfc85599edecbbb6e40a57f79e1CAS |

Maamouri A, Louarn G, Gastal F, Beguier V, Julier B (2015) Effects of lucerne genotype on morphology, biomass production and nitrogen content of lucerne and tall fescue in mixed pastures. Crop & Pasture Science 66, 192–204.
Effects of lucerne genotype on morphology, biomass production and nitrogen content of lucerne and tall fescue in mixed pastures.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2MXksVSlsbs%3D&md5=029ac525b97d9bb489e4737e48fc3026CAS |

Mosimann E, Jeangros B, Suter D, Briner HU (2007) Alfalfa and bromegrass variety trials (2004–2006). Revue Suisse D’Agriculture 39, 189–192.

Nyfeler D, Huguenin-Elie O, Suter M, Frossard E, Lüscher A (2011) Grass–legume mixtures can yield more nitrogen than legume pure stands due to mutual stimulation of nitrogen uptake from symbiotic and non-symbiotic sources. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 140, 155–163.
Grass–legume mixtures can yield more nitrogen than legume pure stands due to mutual stimulation of nitrogen uptake from symbiotic and non-symbiotic sources.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Plancquaert P (1967) ‘Etude sur la production des associations luzerne–graminées.’ (Institut Technique des Céréales et des Fourrages: Paris)

Popp JD, McCaughey WP, Cohen RDH, McAllister TA, Majak W (2000) Enhancing pasture productivity with alfalfa: A review. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 80, 513–519.
Enhancing pasture productivity with alfalfa: A review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

R Core Team (2016) ‘R: A language and environment for statistical computing.’ (R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna)

Rasmussen J, Soegaard K, Pirhofer-Walzl K, Eriksen J (2012) N-2-fixation and residual N effect of four legume species and four companion grass species. European Journal of Agronomy 36, 66–74.
N-2-fixation and residual N effect of four legume species and four companion grass species.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXhtlOnsLrJ&md5=6da8e5ba61edd0a53afaa2f261e7f8cdCAS |

Roscher C, Thein S, Schmid B, Scherer-Lorenzen M (2008) Complementary nitrogen use among potentially dominant species in a biodiversity experiment varies between two years. Journal of Ecology 96, 477–488.
Complementary nitrogen use among potentially dominant species in a biodiversity experiment varies between two years.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Rotili P (1985) Composition of two-component pasture mixtures. Discussion of trial results obtained at Lodi. Rivista di Agronomia 19, 170–177.

Rotili P, Zannone L (1971) The use of competition in the breeding of lucerne. In ‘Eucarpia medicago sativa group’. Lodi, Italy. pp. 41–86. (Istituto Sperimentale per le Colture Foraggere: Lodi, Italy)

Rotili P, Zannone L, Jacquard P (1976) Effects of association on the evaluation of lucerne populations. Annales de l’Amélioration des Plantes 28, 139–145.

Rowe DE, Brink GE (1993) Heritabilities and genetic correlations of white clover clones grown in 3 environments. Crop Science 33, 1149–1152.
Heritabilities and genetic correlations of white clover clones grown in 3 environments.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Rumbaugh M, Pendery B (1991) Stability of forage yield of alfalfa clones grown with five associate species. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 71, 453–459.
Stability of forage yield of alfalfa clones grown with five associate species.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Sackville-Hamilton NR (2001) Measurement of competition and competition effects in pastures. In ‘Competition and succession in pastures’. (Eds PG Tow, A Lazenby) pp. 15–42. (CAB International: Wallingford, UK)

Sanderson MA, Brink G, Ruth L, Stout R (2012) Grass–legume mixtures suppress weeds during establishment better than monocultures. Agronomy Journal 104, 36–42.
Grass–legume mixtures suppress weeds during establishment better than monocultures.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Soussana JF, Lemaire G (2014) Coupling carbon and nitrogen cycles for environmentally sustainable intensification of grasslands and crop–livestock systems. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 190, 9–17.
Coupling carbon and nitrogen cycles for environmentally sustainable intensification of grasslands and crop–livestock systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXhvVahur3F&md5=4e8ce55e8c649cb61ba6b93b1e86e4c6CAS |

Suter M, Connolly J, Finn JA, Loges R, Kirwan L, Sebastia MT, Luscher A (2015) Nitrogen yield advantage from grass–legume mixtures is robust over a wide range of legume proportions and environmental conditions. Global Change Biology 21, 2424–2438.
Nitrogen yield advantage from grass–legume mixtures is robust over a wide range of legume proportions and environmental conditions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Tribouillois H, Fort F, Cruz P, Charles R, Flores O, Garnier E, Justes E (2015) A functional characterisation of a wide range of cover crop species: Growth and nitrogen acquisition rates, leaf traits and ecological strategies. PLoS One 10, e0122156
A functional characterisation of a wide range of cover crop species: Growth and nitrogen acquisition rates, leaf traits and ecological strategies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Volenec J, Cherney J, Johnson K (1987) Yield components, plant morphology, and forage quality of alfalfa as influenced by plant population. Crop Science 27, 321–326.
Yield components, plant morphology, and forage quality of alfalfa as influenced by plant population.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Weigelt A, Jolliffe P (2003) Indices of plant competition. Journal of Ecology 91, 707–720.
Indices of plant competition.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Zannone L, Assemat L, Rotili P, Jacquard P (1983) An experimental study of intraspecific competition within several forage crops. Agronomie 3, 451–459.
An experimental study of intraspecific competition within several forage crops.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Zannone L, Rotili P, Paoletti R, Scotti C (1986) Experimental studies of grass-legume associations. Agronomie 6, 931–940.
Experimental studies of grass-legume associations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |