Outliers-out stack: a new algorithm for processing seismic data
Mohamed RashedWater Research Center, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 80200, Saudi Arabia. Email: rashedmohamed@gmail.com
Exploration Geophysics 49(1) 42-49 https://doi.org/10.1071/EG16025
Submitted: 26 February 2016 Accepted: 26 August 2016 Published: 6 October 2016
Abstract
Common midpoint (CMP) stacking is one of the essential stages in seismic data processing. Conventional straight mean stacking is based on the assumption that all signals are coherent while all noises are random, which is not always valid in practice. Consequently, many alternative stacking techniques have been introduced in the field of seismic data processing during the past five decades. In this study, a new alternative stacking procedure, called outliers-out (OlO) stack, is proposed and tested using both synthetic and field seismic data. The OlO stacking method is based on analysing the statistical spread of each time sample and excluding a distinctive range of outliers from each time sample. Outliers are calculated independently for each time sample based on the amplitudes distribution within the sample. The outliers’ exclusion process is automatic but it is also adjustable by the user to suite the data under processing. The experimental results of applying the proposed stacking method to both synthetic and field seismic data clearly show that the OlO stacking technique outperforms conventional stacking techniques in terms of the temporal resolution and lateral coherency of the output seismic reflections. Results also show that the tuning function in the OlO stacking algorithm is efficient in dealing with different types of seismic data.
Key words: CMP, outliers, processing, S/N ratio, statistics.
References
Bergmann, P., Yang, C., Luth, S. J. C., and Cosma, C., 2011, Time-lapse processing of 2D seismic profiles with testing of static correction methods at the CO2 injection site Ketzin, Germany: Journal of Applied Geophysics, 75, 124–139| Time-lapse processing of 2D seismic profiles with testing of static correction methods at the CO2 injection site Ketzin, Germany:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Claerbout, J., and Muir, F., 1973, Robust modeling with erratic data: Geophysics, 38, 826–844
| Robust modeling with erratic data:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Du, B., and Lines, L., 2000, Crosswell seismic tomography without ray tracing: Exploration Geophysics, 31, 359–365
| Crosswell seismic tomography without ray tracing:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Favret, P., 1991, Methods for attenuating noise in seismic data: US Patent, 4, 992–995.
Haldorsen, B., and Farmer, P., 1989, Suppression of high-energy noise using alternative stacking procedure: Geophysics, 54, 181–190
| Suppression of high-energy noise using alternative stacking procedure:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Liu, G., Fomel, S., Jin, L., and Chen, X., 2009, Stacking seismic data using local correlation: Geophysics, 74, V43–V48
| Stacking seismic data using local correlation:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Mayne, A. H., 1962, Common reflection point horizontal stacking techniques: Geophysics, 27, 927–938
| Common reflection point horizontal stacking techniques:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Moore, D., McCabe, G., and Craig, B., 2009, Introduction to the practice of statistics: W. H. Freeman and Company.
Naess, O., 1979, Superstack – an iterative stacking algorithm: Geophysical Prospecting, 27, 16–28
| Superstack – an iterative stacking algorithm:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Naess, O., and Bruland, L., 1985, Stacking methods other than simple summation, in A. A. Fitch, ed., Developments in geophysical exploration methods 6: Elsevier Applied Science Publishers, 198–223.
Naess, O., and Bruland, L., 1989, Improvement of multichannel seismic data through application of the median concept: Geophysical Prospecting, 37, 225–241
| Improvement of multichannel seismic data through application of the median concept:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Neelamani, R., Dickens, T., and Deffenbaugh, M., 2006, Stack-and-denoise: a new method to stack seismic datasets: 76th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 2827–2831.
Okumura, K., 1997, Foregoing survey of main active faults in the Kinki Triangle no. 22, Nara basin-toen fault system seismic reflection surveys: Geological Survey of Japan Technical Report No. 289.
Rashed, M., 2008, Smart stacking: a new CMP stacking technique for seismic data: The Leading Edge, 27, 462–467
| Smart stacking: a new CMP stacking technique for seismic data:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rashed, M., 2013, Application of alternative seismic stacking techniques to remove ringing noise from GPR data: Near Surface Geophysics, 11, 465–472
| Application of alternative seismic stacking techniques to remove ringing noise from GPR data:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rashed, M., 2014, 50 years of stacking: Acta Geophysica, 62, 505–528
| 50 years of stacking:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rashed, M., and Nakagawa, K., 2006, The effect of different CMP stacking techniques on signal-to-noise ratio of seismic data: two examples from Osaka and Nara, Japan: Journal of Geosciences, Osaka City University, 49, 1–10
Rashed, M., Yamamoto, E., Mitamura, M., Toda, S., Nishida, T., Terada, Y., Uda, H., Yokota, H., Nemoto, H., and Nakagawa, K., 2002, Weighted stack of shallow seismic reflection line acquired in down town Osaka City, Japan: Journal of Applied Geophysics, 50, 231–246
| Weighted stack of shallow seismic reflection line acquired in down town Osaka City, Japan:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ruckemann, C.-P., 2012, Comparison of stacking methods regarding processing and computing of geoscientific depth data: Geoprocessing 2012: The Fourth International Conference on Advanced Geographic Information Systems, Applications and Services, 35–40.
Shon, H., and Yamamoto, T., 1992, Simple data processing procedures for seismic section noise reduction: Geophysics, 57, 1064–1067
| Simple data processing procedures for seismic section noise reduction:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Tyapkin, Y., and Ursin, B., 2005, Optimum stacking of seismic records with irregular noise: Journal of Geophysics and Engineering, 2, 177–187
| Optimum stacking of seismic records with irregular noise:Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Watt, T., and Bednar, J., 1983, Role of the alpha-trimmed mean in combining and analysing seismic common depth point gathers: Technical Program Abstracts and Biographies, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 276–277.