Register      Login
Functional Plant Biology Functional Plant Biology Society
Plant function and evolutionary biology
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Water use, water use efficiency and drought resistance among warm-season turfgrasses in shallow soil profiles

Yi Zhou A , Christopher J. Lambrides A B , Ryan Kearns A , Changrong Ye A and Shu Fukai A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A The University of Queensland, School of Agriculture and Food Sciences, Qld 4072, Australia.

B Corresponding author. Email: chris.lambrides@uq.edu.au

Functional Plant Biology 39(2) 116-125 https://doi.org/10.1071/FP11244
Submitted: 27 October 2011  Accepted: 7 January 2012   Published: 9 February 2012

Abstract

As the available water supply for urban turfgrass management is becoming limited in Australia, it will be crucial to identify drought-resistant turfgrass species and water-saving management strategies. Eight (pre-)commercial turfgrasses grown in Australia, two each of four species including the bermudagrasses (Cynodon dactylon L.), the Queensland blue couches (Digitaria didactyla Willd), the seashore paspalums (Paspalum vaginatum Swartz.) and St Augustinegrasses (Stenotaphrum secundatum (Walt.) Kuntze) were evaluated in two lysimeter experiments. Shallow lysimeters (28 and 40 cm) were used to represent shallow soil profiles typical of urban environments. We measured gravimetric water use for the eight cultivars and calculated water use efficiency (WUE, clipping yield to water use ratio) and WUEr (ratio of WUE under drought to that under irrigated conditions). WUEr measured in both experiments correlated strongly with survival period and this relationship was not affected by soil type or cutting height. Using survival period as the criterion for drought resistance, the best were the bermudagrasses and the worst were the seashore paspalums and Queensland blue couches. The bermudagrass genotypes had the lowest water use, highest WUE and WUEr and the Queensland blue couches and seashore paspalums had the greatest water use, lowest WUE and WUEr. The possible mechanisms of drought resistance included lower water use and lower stomatal conductance as indicated by higher canopy temperature in the early stage of water deficit.

Additional keywords: canopy temperature, evapotranspiration, shallow soil, survival period, turfgrass, water use efficiency.


References

Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) ‘Crop evapotranspiration-guidelines for computing crop water requirements.’ (FAO: Rome)

Aronson LJ, Gold AJ, Hull RJ (1987) Cool-season turfgrass responses to drought stress. Crop Science 27, 1261–1266.
Cool-season turfgrass responses to drought stress.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Atkins CE, Green RL, Sifers SI, Beard JB (1991) Evapotranspiration rates and growth-characteristics of 10 St Augustinegrass genotypes. HortScience 26, 1488–1491.

Australia Productivity Commission (2009) ‘Government drought support.’ (Productivity Commission: Melbourne)

Baker KF, Chandler PA (1957) ‘The UC system for producing healthy container: grown plants through the use of clean soil, clean stock and sanitation.’ (University of California: Berkeley, CA)

Beard JB (1973) ‘Turfgrass: science and culture.’ (Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ)

Beard JB (1985) An assessment of water use by turfgrass. In ‘Turfgrass, water conservation’. (Eds VA Gibeault, ST Cockerham) pp. 45–61. (Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of California: Riverside, CA)

Beard JB, Green RL, Sifers SI (1992) Evapotranspiration and leaf extension rates of 24 well-watered, turf-type Cynodon genotypes. HortScience 27, 986–988.

Biran I, Bravdo B, Bushkin-Harav I, Rawitz E (1981) Water consumption and growth rate of 11 turfgrasses as affected by mowing height, irrigation frequency, and soil moisture. Agronomy Journal 73, 85–90.
Water consumption and growth rate of 11 turfgrasses as affected by mowing height, irrigation frequency, and soil moisture.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bowman DC, Macaulay L (1991) Comparative evapotranspiration rates of tall fescue cultivars. HortScience 26, 122–123.

Carrow RN (1995) Drought resistance aspects of turfgrasses in the southeast: evapotranspiration and crop coefficients. Crop Science 35, 1685–1690.
Drought resistance aspects of turfgrasses in the southeast: evapotranspiration and crop coefficients.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Carrow RN (1996a) Drought avoidance characteristics of diverse tall fescue cultivars. Crop Science 36, 371–377.
Drought avoidance characteristics of diverse tall fescue cultivars.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Carrow RN (1996b) Drought resistance aspects of turfgrasses in the southeast: root–shoot responses. Crop Science 36, 687–694.
Drought resistance aspects of turfgrasses in the southeast: root–shoot responses.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ebdon JS, Kopp KL (2004) Relationships between water use efficiency, carbon isotope discrimination, and turf performance in genotypes of Kentucky bluegrass during drought. Crop Science 44, 1754–1762.
Relationships between water use efficiency, carbon isotope discrimination, and turf performance in genotypes of Kentucky bluegrass during drought.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ehleringer JR, Hall AE, Farquhar, GD (1993) ‘Stable isotopes and plant carbon-water relations.’ (Academic Press: San Diego, CA)

Ervin EH, Koski AJ (1998) Drought avoidance aspects and crop coefficients of Kentucky bluegrass and tall fescue turfs in the semiarid west. Crop Science 38, 788–795.
Drought avoidance aspects and crop coefficients of Kentucky bluegrass and tall fescue turfs in the semiarid west.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Fernandez GCJ, Love B (1993) Comparing turfgrass cumulative evapotranspiration curves. HortScience 28, 732–734.

Fry J, Huang B (2004) ‘Applied turfgrass science and physiology.’ (John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ)

Ghannoum O, von Caemmerer S, Conroy JP (2002) The effect of drought on plant water use efficiency of nine NAD-ME and nine NADP-ME Australian C-4 grasses. Functional Plant Biology 29, 1337–1348.
The effect of drought on plant water use efficiency of nine NAD-ME and nine NADP-ME Australian C-4 grasses.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38Xps1ygtLo%3D&md5=dc8c5bb67fc5aedcc1ad105e753fe6c2CAS |

Gibbs R, Watson GE, Koekemoer L, Smook M, Barker L, Anderson NP, Dallwitz MJ (1991) ‘Grasses of southern Africa.’ (National Botanical Institute: Pretoria, South Africa)

Green RL, Sifers SI, Atkins CE, Beard JB (1991) Evapotranspiration rates of 11 Zoysia genotypes. HortScience 26, 264–266.

Hays KL, Barber JF, Kenna MP, McCollum TG (1991) Drought avoidance mechanisms of selected bermudagrass genotypes. HortScience 26, 180–182.

Huang BR (2008) Mechanisms and strategies for improving drought resistance in turfgrass. Acta Horticulturae 783, 221–227.

Jackson RD, Idso SB, Reginato RJ, Pinter PJ (1981) Canopy temperature as a crop water stress indicator. Water Resources Research 17, 1133–1138.
Canopy temperature as a crop water stress indicator.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kearns R, Zhou Y, Kearns R, Zhou Y, Fukai S, Ye C, Loch D, Godwin I, Holton T, Innes D, Stirling H, Cao N, Jewell M, Lambrides C (2009) Eco-turf: water use efficient turfgrasses from Australian biodiversity. Acta Horticulturae 829, 113–118.

Kim KS, Beard JB (1988) Comparative turfgrass evapotranspiration rates and associated plant morphological characteristics. Crop Science 28, 328–331.
Comparative turfgrass evapotranspiration rates and associated plant morphological characteristics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kim KS, Beard JB, Sifers SI (1988) Drought resistance comparisons among major warm-season turfgrasses. United States Golf Association, Green Section: Far Hills, NJ)

Levitt J (1980) ‘Responses of plants to environmental stresses.’ (Academic Press: New York)

Liu XZ, Huang BR (2002) Mowing effects on root production, growth, and mortality of creeping bentgrass. Crop Science 42, 1241–1250.
Mowing effects on root production, growth, and mortality of creeping bentgrass.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Loch D (2007a) Developing tough turf: an overview. In ‘Turf for tough times – keeping grass cover with less water’. (Ed. C Carson) pp. 1–5. (Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries: Cleveland, Qld)

Loch D (2007b) Drought tolerant turf is built from. In ‘Turf News. Vol. 50’. pp. 5. (Turfgrass Producers International: East Dundee, IL)

Maksimov NA (1929) ‘The plant in relation to water: a study of the physiological basis of drought resistance.’ (Allen & Unwin: London)

McCann SE, Huang BR (2008) Evaluation of drought tolerance and avoidance traits for six creeping bentgrass cultivars. HortScience 43, 519–524.

Paleg LG, Aspinall D (1981) ‘The physiology and biochemistry of drought resistance in plants.’ (Academic Press: Sydney)

Perdomo P, Murphy JA, Berkowitz GA (1996) Physiological changes associated with performance of Kentucky bluegrass cultivars during summer stress. HortScience 31, 1182–1186.

Salaiz TA, Shearman RC, Riordan TP, Kinbacher EJ (1991) Creeping bentgrass cultivar water use and rooting responses. Crop Science 31, 1331–1334.
Creeping bentgrass cultivar water use and rooting responses.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Sharp D, Simon BK (2002) ‘AusGrass: grasses of Australia.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne)

Smith DI (1998) ‘Water in Australia, resources and management.’ (Oxford University Press: Melbourne)

Tanner CB (1963) Plant temperatures. Agronomy Journal 55, 210–211.
Plant temperatures.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Zhao YG, Fernandez CJ, Bowman DC, Nowak RS (1994) Selection criteria for drought-resistance breeding in turfgrass. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 119, 1317–1324.

Zhou Y, Lambrides C, Kearns R, Ye C, Cao N, Fukai S (2009) Selecting for drought tolerance among Australian green couch grasses (Cynodon spp.). Crop and Pasture Science 60, 1175–1183.
Selecting for drought tolerance among Australian green couch grasses (Cynodon spp.).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |