CSIRO Publishing blank image blank image blank image blank imageBooksblank image blank image blank image blank imageJournalsblank image blank image blank image blank imageAbout Usblank image blank image blank image blank imageShopping Cartblank image blank image blank image You are here: Journals > Australian Health Review   
Australian Health Review
http://www.aushealthcare.com.au/
  Journal of the Australian Healthcare & Hospitals Association
 
blank image Search
 
blank image blank image
blank image
 
  Advanced Search
   

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Contacts
For Advertisers
Content
Online Early
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Sample Issue
For Authors
General Information
Instructions to Authors
Submit Article
Open Access
For Referees
Referee Guidelines
Review an Article
Annual Referee Index
Call for Reviewers
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates

blue arrow e-Alerts
blank image
Subscribe to our Email Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

red arrow Connect with AHR
blank image
facebook   TwitterIcon

red arrow Connect with CP
blank image
facebook twitter youtube

 

Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 24(2)

Health insurance in the Philippines:bold policies and socio-economic realities

Don Hindle, Lito Acuin and MAdz Valera

Australian Health Review 24(2) 96 - 111
Published: 2001

Abstract

In 1995, the Philippines government legislated to create an income-rated and predominantly employment-baseduniversal health insurance program over a 15-year period. The program was intended to provide more and betterhealth care than was available through a combination of existing insurance schemes that covered less than half of thepopulation, and partially subsidised services provided by government facilities and funded from general taxation.The legislation was well intentioned, and the program has some skilful and imaginative staff. However, there aresignificant barriers to success including low average and widely dispersed incomes, improving but still unsatisfactoryhealth status, weak government health care services, and the sometimes negative impact of for-profit agencies.We review progress to date and conclude that, although membership numbers and benefit rates have increased, accessis still inadequate and copayments are high. We argue that strong and innovative steps are needed if the Program'sgoals are to be realised. In particular, we suggest that the focus should be on more formal and explicit rationing thattakes account of cost per quality-adjusted life-year; and radical adjustment of financial incentives for care providersincluding capitation and per case payment based on costed clinical pathways for high-volume case types. Finally, wecomment briefly on lessons that might be learned by both The Philippines and Australia.



Full text doi:10.1071/AH010096

© AHHA 2001

blank image
 
 PDF (61 KB)
 Export Citation
 Print
  
    
Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2014