
%0 Journal Article
%A Rowling, K.R. 
%A Reid, DD 
%T Effect of temporal changes in size composition on estimates of von Bertalanffy growth parameters for Gemfish, <I>Rexa solandri</I> (Cuvier), Gempylidae
%J Marine and Freshwater Research
%D 1992/10/01
%V 43
%N 5
%P 1229-1239
%K 
%R https://doi.org/10.1071/MF9921229
%U https://www.publish.csiro.au/paper/MF9921229 
%X Estimates of von Bertalanffy growth parameters were made for mature (>3-year-old) gemfish (Rexea solandri), using otoliths sampled biennially from commercial catches between 1980 and 1986. During this period, there was a significant decline in the mean length of mature gemfish in the catch. Large variations in growth-parameter estimates were found over the period sampled (e.g. L&#8734; ranged between 87.3 and 130.3 cm for males and between 113.1 and 134.7 cm for females). Likelihood-ratio tests showed many of the growth-parameter estimates to be significantly different between the years sampled. Inclusion in the analyses of data for juvenile (1- to 3-year-old) fish considerably reduced both the standard errors of the parameter estimates and the significance of the variations between them. Comparison of parameters estimated by following the growth of individual cohorts spawned in 1975 and 1981 suggested that the variations in the parameters for the 1980-86 data were caused by differences in the length composition of the samples rather than by changes in the growth rate of the fish. The results suggest the need for care when comparing growth parameters estimated for different populations, especially when there are large differences in length composition. The best estimates of growth parameters for gemfish were considered to be those derived from the aggregate data for the whole of the period sampled, including the data for juveniles. For male gemfish these best estimates (with asymptotic standard errors in parentheses) were L&#8734; =97.5 (0.8) cm, K=0.212 (0.005) year-1 and to = - 0.54 (0.05) years, and for females the estimates were L&#8734; = 109.4 (0.6) cm, K= 0.180 (0.003) year-1 and to= -0.63 (0.04) years. Likelihood-ratio tests showed these estimates of L&#8734; and K to be significantly different between the sexes. 
