CSIRO Publishing Books Journals About Us Shopping Cart You are here: Journals > Functional Plant Biology   
Functional Plant Biology
  Plant Function & Evolutionary Biology
 
Search
 
 
  Advanced Search
   

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Contacts
Content
Online Early
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Special Issues
Research Fronts
Reviews
Evolutionary Reviews
Sample Issue
For Authors
General Information
Notice to Authors
Submit Article
Open Access
For Referees
General Information
Review Article
Annual Referee Index
Referee Guidelines
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates

 Early Alert
Subscribe to our email Early Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

 Connect with us
facebook   youtube

 PrometheusWiki
PrometheusWiki
Protocols in ecological and environmental plant physiology

 

Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 32(5)

Welwitschia mirabilis: CAM or not CAM — what is the answer?

Dieter J. von Willert A B, Nicole Armbrüster A, Tobias Drees A, Maik Zaborowski A

A Institute for Plant Ecology, Westfälische Wilhelms-University, Hindenburgplatz 55, D-48143 Münster, Germany.
B Corresponding author. Email: Willert@uni-muenster.de
C This paper originates from a presentation at the IIIrd International Congress on Crassulacean Acid Metabolism, Cape Tribulation, Queensland, Australia, August 2001
 
PDF (277 KB) $25
 Export Citation
 Print
  


Abstract

After more than 20 years of extensive study we found clear evidence that Welwitschia mirabilis Hook.f. is able to take up CO2 at night in both of its natural ecosystems, the Namib desert and the Mopane savannah, and hence should be classified a crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM) plant. At six different sites, 85 W. mirabilis plants were marked and the growth rate of their leaves and leaf ribbons were measured over a period of 2.5 years. The slowest and the fastest growing plant of these 85 plants were from the Mopane savannah and from the north-west of the Brandberg massif, respectively. These were selected for the gas-exchange measurements of this study. Within the course of a year nocturnal CO2 uptake was found only in December and January when the nights were shortest and plants were flowering. CO2 uptake during the night was not pronounced and never accounted for more than 4% of the total CO2 uptake over 24 h. Maximum rates of nocturnal CO2 uptake never exceeded 0.1 µmol m–2 s–1 for the slowest and 0.2 µmol m–2 s–1 for the fastest growing plant. Neither water availability in the soil nor night temperature was found to determine nocturnal CO2 uptake in terms known for CAM plants. Regardless of the growing site all leaves of W. mirabilis contained high amounts of malic and citric acid. Small increases of acids over night as calculated from the gas exchange measurements are masked by the extremely uneven distribution of these acids in the leaves, making the feature of an overnight malic or citric acid accumulation an unsuited test for CAM in W. mirabilis. An increase in 13C discrimination with increasing distance from the coast was confirmed. Photorespiration was extremely high and followed air temperature around the leaf. Although the debate whether or not W. mirabilis is a CAM plant can be closed, no answer could be given why W. mirabilis makes so little use of CAM.

Keywords: citric acid, CO2 uptake, malic acid, Welwitschia mirabilis.


   
Subscriber Login
Username:
Password:  

    


 
Top  Email this page
 
Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2012