CSIRO Publishing Books Journals About Us Shopping Cart You are here: Journals > Functional Plant Biology   
Functional Plant Biology
  Plant Function & Evolutionary Biology
 
Search
 
 
  Advanced Search
   

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Contacts
Content
Online Early
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Special Issues
Research Fronts
Reviews
Evolutionary Reviews
Sample Issue
For Authors
General Information
Notice to Authors
Submit Article
Open Access
For Referees
General Information
Review Article
Annual Referee Index
Referee Guidelines
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates

 Early Alert
Subscribe to our email Early Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

 Connect with us
facebook   youtube

 PrometheusWiki
PrometheusWiki
Protocols in ecological and environmental plant physiology

 

Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 34(9)

The effect of elevated CO2, soil and atmospheric water deficit and seasonal phenology on leaf and ecosystem isoprene emission

Emiliano Pegoraro A , Mark J. Potosnak B, Russell K. Monson C, Ana Rey A F, Greg Barron-Gafford D, C. Barry Osmond E

A Department of Desertification and Geoecology, Estación Experimental de Zonas Áridas, CSIC, 04001 Almería, Spain.
B Division of Earth and Ecosystem Sciences, Desert Research Institute, Reno, NV 89512, USA.
C Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, and Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA.
D Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA.
E School of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia.
F Corresponding author. Email: arey@eeza.csic.es
 
PDF (329 KB) $25
 Export Citation
 Print
  


Abstract

Two cottonwood plantations were grown at different CO2 concentrations at the Biosphere 2 Laboratory in Arizona to investigate the response of isoprene emission to elevated [CO2] and its interaction with water deficits. We focused on responses due to seasonal variation and variation in the mean climate from one year to the next. In fall and in spring, isoprene emission rate showed a similar inhibition by elevated [CO2], despite an 8–10°C seasonal difference in mean air temperature. The overall response of isoprene emission to drought was also similar for observations conducted during the spring or fall, and during the fall of two different years with an approximate 5°C difference in mean air temperature. In general, leaf-level isoprene emission rates, measured at constant temperature and photon-flux density, decreased slightly, or remained constant during drought, whereas ecosystem-level isoprene emission rates increased. The uncoupling of ecosystem- and leaf-scale responses is not due to differential dependence on leaf area index (LAI) as LAI increased only slightly, or decreased, during the drought treatments at the same time that ecosystem isoprene emission rate increased greatly. Nor does the difference in isoprene emission rate between leaves and ecosystems appear to be due solely to increases in canopy surface temperature during the drought, though some increase in temperature was observed. It is possible that still further factors, such as increased penetration of PPFD into the canopy as a result of changes in leaf angle, reduced sink strength of the soil for atmospheric isoprene, and decreases in the mean Ci of leaves, combined with the small increases in canopy surface temperature, increased the ecosystem isoprene emission rate. Whatever the causes of the differences in the leaf and ecosystem responses, we conclude that the overall shape of the leaf and ecosystem responses to drought was constant irrespective of season or year.

Keywords: Biosphere 2, climate, drought, interannual, leaf area index, NEE, photosynthesis, Populus deltoides, soil, temperature.


   
Subscriber Login
Username:
Password:  

    


 
Top  Email this page
 
Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2012