CSIRO Publishing Home Books & CDs Journals About Us Shopping Cart
Functional Plant Biology
  Functional analysis of plants
You are here: Journals > Functional Plant Biology   
Search
 
 
  Advanced Search
   
Journal Home
General Information
Scope
Editorial Board
Editorial Contacts
Awards and Prizes
Affiliated Societies
Sites of Interest
Print Publication Dates
Online Content
For Authors
For Referees
How to Order

 Most Read
Visit our Most Read page regularly to view the most downloaded papers.

 Early Alert
Subscribe to our email Early Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

 

The lutein epoxide cycle in higher plants: its relationships to other xanthophyll cycles and possible functions

Jose I. García-Plazaola A, Shizue Matsubara B and C. Barry Osmond C D

A Department of Plant Biology and Ecology, UPV/EHU, Apdo. 644, 48080 Bilbao, Spain.
B Institut Phytosphäre (ICG3), Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany.
C School of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia.
D Corresponding author. Email: barry.osmond@anu.edu.au


Abstract

Several xanthophyll cycles have been described in photosynthetic organisms. Among them, only two are present in higher plants: the ubiquitous violaxanthin (V) cycle, and the taxonomically restricted lutein epoxide (Lx) cycle, whereas four cycles seem to occur in algae. Although V is synthesised through the β-branch of the carotenoid biosynthetic pathway and Lx is the product of the α-branch; both are co-located in the same sites of the photosynthetic pigment-protein complexes isolated from thylakoids. Both xanthophylls are also de-epoxidised upon light exposure by the same enzyme, violaxanthin de-epoxidase (VDE) leading to the formation of zeaxanthin (Z) and lutein (L) at comparable rates. In contrast with VDE, the reverse reaction presumably catalysed by zeaxanthin epoxidase (ZE), is much slower (or even inactive) with L than with antheraxanthin (A) or Z. Consequently many species lack Lx altogether, and although the presence of Lx shows an irregular taxonomical distribution in unrelated taxa, it has a high fidelity at family level. In those plants which accumulate Lx, variations in ZE activity in vivo mean that a complete Lx-cycle occurs in some (with Lx pools being restored overnight), whereas in others a truncated cycle is observed in which VDE converts Lx into L, but regeneration of Lx by ZE is extremely slow. Accumulation of Lx to high concentrations is found most commonly in old leaves in deeply shaded canopies, and the Lx cycle in these leaves is usually truncated. This seemingly anomalous situation presumably arises because ZE has a low but finite affinity for L, and because deeply shaded leaves are not often exposed to light intensities strong enough to activate VDE. Notably, both in vitro and in vivo studies have recently shown that accumulation of Lx can increase the light harvesting efficiency in the antennae of PSII. We propose a model for the truncated Lx cycle in strong light in which VDE converts Lx to L which then occupies sites L2 and V1 in the light-harvesting antenna complex of PSII (Lhcb), displacing V and Z. There is correlative evidence that this photoconverted L facilitates energy dissipation via non-photochemical quenching and thereby converts a highly efficient light harvesting system to an energy dissipating system with improved capacity to engage photoprotection. Operation of the α- and β-xanthophyll cycles with different L and Z epoxidation kinetics thus allows a combination of rapidly and slowly reversible modulation of light harvesting and photoprotection, with each cycle having distinct effects. Based on the patchy taxonomical distribution of Lx, we propose that the presence of Lx (and the Lx cycle) could be the result of a recurrent mutation in the epoxidase gene that increases its affinity for L, which is conserved whenever it confers an evolutionary advantage.

Keywords: antheraxanthin, α-carotene, de-epoxidase, epoxidase, lutein, lutein epoxide, non-photochemical quenching, photoprotection, violaxanthin, xanthophyll cycles, zeaxanthin.

Functional Plant Biology 34(9) 759–773    doi:10.1071/FP07095
Submitted: 18 April 2007    Accepted: 8 June 2007    Published: 30 August 2007





   
Subscriber Login
Username:
Password:  

 View
Issue Contents
PDF (474 KB) $25
Export Citation
Cited by
 Tools
Print
Email this page
    


 
Top  Email this page
 


Legal & Privacy | Sitemap | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2010