CSIRO Publishing Books Journals About Us Shopping Cart You are here: Journals > Functional Plant Biology   
Functional Plant Biology
  Plant Function & Evolutionary Biology
 
Search
 
 
  Advanced Search
   

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Contacts
Content
Online Early
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Special Issues
Research Fronts
Reviews
Evolutionary Reviews
Sample Issue
For Authors
General Information
Notice to Authors
Submit Article
Open Access
For Referees
General Information
Review Article
Annual Referee Index
Referee Guidelines
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates

 Early Alert
Subscribe to our email Early Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

 Connect with us
facebook   youtube

 PrometheusWiki
PrometheusWiki
Protocols in ecological and environmental plant physiology

 

Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 28(7)

Mechanosensory ion channels in Chara: the influence of cell turgor pressure on touch-activated receptor potentials and action potentials

Virginia A. Shepherd, Teruo Shimmen and Mary J. Beilby

Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 28(7) 551 - 566

Abstract

Chara cells produce receptor potentials (RPDs) in response to mechanical stimulation. We have used a mechanostimulatory device to compare characteristics of touch-activated RPDs and action potentials (APs) when cell turgor pressure was changed. The device delivered a series of mechanical stimulations of increasing energy (F0.5, F1, F2, F3, F4, F5 and F6). Cells were alternately stimulated in artificial pondwater (APW) and a sorbitol series, in long-term experiments, involving up to six solution changes. The calculated cell turgor pressures were about 0.6 MPa (APW), and 0.49 MPa, 0.37 MPa, 0.24 MPa and 0.12 MPa in 50, 100, 150 and 200 mM sorbitol–APW, respectively. In other experiments, cells were pre-conditioned in the sorbitol solutions, and then transferred to APW. All cells were allowed long recovery periods (40–60 min) after APs or solution transfers. Only small changes in cell conductance were observed in IV and GV analysis of unstimulated cells after reducing turgor pressure from 0.59 MPa to 0.24 MPa. In APW, the RPDs increased in amplitude and duration with increased stimulus energy until the threshold RPD was reached, and an AP was triggered, usually between stimulus F4 and F5. Cells with decreased turgor pressure became more sensitive to stimulation, giving threshold RPDs or APs with smaller stimulus (e.g. between F0.5 and F3). Conversely, an increase in cell turgor pressure (return to APW) led to a decrease in sensitivity to stimulus. When turgor pressure was greatly decreased (to 0.12 MPa), some cells became unresponsive or gave unusual responses. However, only the mechanical part of the touch response was affected by changing the cell turgor pressure. The mean amplitudes of the subthreshold and threshold RPD (that triggers the AP), and of the touch-activated APs, were independent of cell turgor pressure, although action potentials had smaller amplitude when turgor was reduced to about 0.12 MPa. The amplitude of the subthreshold RPD was close to 20 mV, and the amplitude of the threshold RPD was close to 50 mV, in all cells. If tension of the cell wall–plasma membrane–cytoskeleton complex decreased along with decreased cell turgor pressure, a given stimulus could stretch the complex to a greater extent, resulting in activation of more mechanosensory channels. The effect on the RPD of changes in cell turgor pressure is discussed in relation to the mechanical properties of the cell wall–plasma membrane–cytoskeleton complex.



Full text doi:10.1071/PP01035

© CSIRO 2001

 
PDF (928 KB) $25
 Export Citation
 Print
  
  
Subscriber Login
Username:
Password:  

    


 
Top  Email this page
 
Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2012